Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 01 May 2008 (Thursday) 14:14
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Solitude Sunset

 
photomaster
Mostly Lurking
12 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Kamloops BC
     
May 01, 2008 14:14 |  #1

Hey everyone this is my first post on here so if i make any mistakes on format or size or anything, please be easy on me. Anyways i took this picture awhile ago, probably last summer up in Kamloops, BC behide my house. Found it on my computer and thought i would post it up for some constructive critisms

so throw them at me


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jbdavies
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,738 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Utah
     
May 01, 2008 16:15 |  #2

Pretty nice. Like the colors. The foreground looks real grainy to me though. :)


-Jeremy-
UPDATED!! www.sur-realphotography.com (external link) UPDATED!!
Facebook Profile (external link) | Facebook Page (external link)
Google+ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Full-Frame
Member
Avatar
141 posts
Joined Nov 2007
     
May 01, 2008 16:16 |  #3

Nice use of the rule of 3rds. I would have avoided including any foreground. It's just a big dark mass that is quite distracting. Otherwise, a nice silhouette :)


My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
exile
Senior Member
Avatar
903 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Location: UK (South West...now East Anglia ...and back in Northern Ireland at last)
     
May 01, 2008 16:25 |  #4

The composition in in the ball park. The exposure of the sky seems fine, but the foreground is too dark. Read up on ND grads for how to fix this :)


Outdoor photographer and writer in Northern Ireland (external link)
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/80146277@N00/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BASmith
Senior Member
Avatar
528 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
May 01, 2008 22:40 |  #5

Several big no no's here.

1) way to much use of foreground thats not exposed properly.
Always, if you underexpose the fore, crop for the aft. To include both at near thirds is ugly.

2) Focus
You focused on the tree, it is not really the main subject.

3) Focus Failure.
The clouds were the main subject of the matter here. You failed to focus on them. The tree foreground could have been forgiven if you had focused on the clouds. However, there wasn't that much action to make it exceptional, tho the colors are nice.

4) Compression
You over compressed your photo. It shows banding in the sky at a high rate. An acceptable file is 200k and up, depending on hosting. Your file is a mere 42 k . Up the compression rate to 200k or better and it would get rid of the banding.

5) Crop
Crop out that foreground and the top of the sky and just leave enough of the foreground and above the skyline of the clouds to improve this photo 100%


"I don't take Pictures. I record events that everyone should see, no matter how stupid."
My List: I have stuff. I want more stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photomaster
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
12 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Kamloops BC
     
May 02, 2008 00:59 |  #6

thanks for those tips, ya i didnt know what size to put it on as so i just compressed it like that, so heres the same one croped and resized at a level i hope is better

anyways keep them coming


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jbdavies
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,738 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Utah
     
May 02, 2008 01:00 |  #7

Hey! I like this one a lot better! Great job! :)


-Jeremy-
UPDATED!! www.sur-realphotography.com (external link) UPDATED!!
Facebook Profile (external link) | Facebook Page (external link)
Google+ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photomaster
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
12 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Kamloops BC
     
May 02, 2008 01:03 |  #8

awesome, ya i like it alot better aswell, still couldnt get the size right but whatever




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jbdavies
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,738 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Utah
     
May 02, 2008 01:05 |  #9

Meh, personally I don't think the size matters that much on here. Where it matters is in your gallery and when you print it. :)


-Jeremy-
UPDATED!! www.sur-realphotography.com (external link) UPDATED!!
Facebook Profile (external link) | Facebook Page (external link)
Google+ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Avi
Goldmember
3,073 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Bangalore, India
     
May 02, 2008 01:20 |  #10

2nd is a better edit of a nice capture...

Avi


Canon XTi, Lens: canon 18-55 Kit Lens, Sigma 70-300
saving for: Canon 1Ds Mark III, Tokina 12-24, Canon 28-70
http://avingaur.blogsp​ot.com/ (external link)

I GAZE AT THE SUNSET WITH THE WOMAN I LOVE AND THINK F8 AT 1/250. :-P

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photomaster
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
12 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Kamloops BC
     
May 02, 2008 01:26 |  #11

ya i just had them printed and there remarkable clear compared to these, but with the world turning digital what u see on the computer is almost getting more important, however the full version is still very crisp




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Full-Frame
Member
Avatar
141 posts
Joined Nov 2007
     
May 02, 2008 03:02 as a reply to  @ photomaster's post |  #12

what u see on the computer is almost getting more important, however the full version is still very crisp

The file size that you can upload to this site is very limited. If you want to show your images in all their glory, I would recommend signing up to an image hosting site, and then embedding the files instead.


My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,027 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Solitude Sunset
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1747 guests, 104 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.