Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 02 May 2008 (Friday) 12:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Is this wasted time?

 
mattograph
"God bless the new meds"
Avatar
7,693 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
     
May 02, 2008 12:52 |  #1

At my day job, I work in sales. We sell consumer electronics, and do our own photography in house. We manufacture the products, so all images originate with us.

Our graphics department has set up a small studio in house. The studio consists of a continuous monolight into a large softbox, a Rebel 400 with kit lens, and a big shooting table done all in BLACK!

Initially, we were advised to do everything in black by the graphics department because we do some wood speakers, and the black helped "bring out the grain." That made some sense to me. But now I just watched a photo shoot where they did five point n shoot cameras, all in black plastic. I asked them, out of curiousity, how long it would take to get the images back. They told me it would take about a "day or two in photoshop".

Now, I am no PS expert, but I do know how to light a still life. I could light these suckers and shoot them so they were pretty much usable right out of the camera -- these aren't lifestyle shots.

Am I crazy, or are these guys making things harder than they have to be? Am I missing something?


This space for rent.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jimconnerphoto
Goldmember
Avatar
2,177 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 72
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Southern California
     
May 02, 2008 14:35 |  #2

speaking from a work flow perspective that is not unreasonable.
I do not think they mean they intend on working in photoshop on 7 images to take 8-16 hours.
just as it only takes 2 minutes to make a grilled cheese sandwich but if you have to make 30 of them you may take a little longer.


Wedding and Portraits www.jimconnerphoto.com (external link)
Commercial Work www.jamesdconner.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
_aravena
isn't this answer a stickie yet?
Avatar
12,458 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Back in the 757
     
May 02, 2008 14:38 |  #3

^Yeah...although I have spent like 30mins working on one photo with little interruption from my addiction to this site.

It all depends but that was for a wedding and a complicated edit. Like what photos?


Last Shot Photography
My Site (external link) ~ Gear List ~ Bag Reviews

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ryant35
Goldmember
Avatar
4,389 posts
Gallery: 16 photos
Likes: 459
Joined May 2007
Location: Cypress, CA
     
May 02, 2008 15:39 |  #4

mmm grilled cheese.



5DMK4, 7DMK2, 24-104mm f/4 L, 70-200mm f/2.8 IS II, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 IS MK2, 17-40mm f/4, 100mm f/2.8 Macro, 35mm f/1.4,1.4X & 2X TC III 580EXII
www.ryantorresphotogra​phy.com (external link)Photography Facebook Fan Page (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jimconnerphoto
Goldmember
Avatar
2,177 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 72
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Southern California
     
May 02, 2008 15:48 |  #5

yes, a perfect example. simple and effective


Wedding and Portraits www.jimconnerphoto.com (external link)
Commercial Work www.jamesdconner.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mattograph
THREAD ­ STARTER
"God bless the new meds"
Avatar
7,693 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
     
May 03, 2008 09:03 |  #6

Some clarification.

I don't doubt that they aren't spending valuable time in photoshop, but I wonder if they were lighting correctly, if it would not be saying them alot of time. They spend about an average of 4 hours per image.

I bring up the lighting because they use that as an explanation for the challenges they face.

If we spend $2000 on lighting- nice, solid easy to use stuff, and we cut their photoshop time in half, those lights would pay for themselves in about 3 months, based on what they make and how much shooting we do.


This space for rent.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
May 03, 2008 20:17 |  #7

and we cut their photoshop time in half,

Sounds to me as if the graphics department people are building in some job security. ;)


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
breal101
Goldmember
2,724 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Aug 2006
     
May 03, 2008 22:47 |  #8

Is the pooch pregnant yet?


"Try to go out empty and let your images fill you up." Jay Maisel

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jimconnerphoto
Goldmember
Avatar
2,177 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 72
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Southern California
     
May 04, 2008 03:55 |  #9

4 hours an image seems excessive. That would be longer then 1-2 days for 7 images.
what are they doing to these images?
Are you shooting black objects on black backgrounds?
where exactly does a pregnant pooch come into this thread.. lol


Wedding and Portraits www.jimconnerphoto.com (external link)
Commercial Work www.jamesdconner.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mattograph
THREAD ­ STARTER
"God bless the new meds"
Avatar
7,693 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
     
May 04, 2008 15:00 |  #10

zagiace wrote in post #5456956 (external link)
4 hours an image seems excessive. That would be longer then 1-2 days for 7 images.
what are they doing to these images?
Are you shooting black objects on black backgrounds?
where exactly does a pregnant pooch come into this thread.. lol


Actually, they were shooting black objects against black backgrounds.


This space for rent.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
breal101
Goldmember
2,724 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Aug 2006
     
May 04, 2008 15:23 |  #11

Black on black really isn't that tough, especially with digital. Hence my comment.

http://everything2.com​/index.pl?node_id=5451​54 (external link)

Third definition

New lights probably won't help these guys, a new way of thinking about it might and that is free.


"Try to go out empty and let your images fill you up." Jay Maisel

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mattograph
THREAD ­ STARTER
"God bless the new meds"
Avatar
7,693 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
     
May 04, 2008 21:04 |  #12

breal101 wrote in post #5459363 (external link)
Black on black really isn't that tough, especially with digital. Hence my comment.

http://everything2.com​/index.pl?node_id=5451​54 (external link)

Third definition

New lights probably won't help these guys, a new way of thinking about it might and that is free.

ROFL!!!!


This space for rent.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,322 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Is this wasted time?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2245 guests, 133 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.