Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 03 May 2008 (Saturday) 22:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Keey rate on sports photography

 
saggy9999
Senior Member
395 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Linlithgow, Scotland
     
May 15, 2008 14:39 |  #16

difficult question to answer
when shooting football(soccer) I will usually shoot around 700 frames a game
and hope to end up with 40/50 shots worth "keeping"
this can be down to a sequence with two players and firing a burst of 8 to 10 frames
and only one or two being the key moment in the clash
or two players going for a header there will always be a shot or two either side of the
monent the ball hits head


2 x Canon 1D Mark II, & 40D
Canon 400mm 2.8L Mark II:lol:
Canon 70-200mm 2.8L 50mm 1.8Sigma 15-30mm.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cstewart
Goldmember
Avatar
1,866 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 16
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Victoria, B.C. Canada
     
May 15, 2008 17:43 |  #17

Itz:

I agree with many others here in that it all depends on what your definition of keeper is. I can really only relate to hockey at this point and my "keepers" are those shots I deem worthy enough to post on a web site for the team to see and possibly purchase. Given this definition, I would usually shoot around 450-500 images a game (2 4GB cards) and from these keep around 70-80 (at the most) for the web for a rate of around 15-20%. This does not include any images already deleted in camera during intermissions or when chimping. Given the issues around lighting for hockey (in minor rinks) I suspect keeper rates for other sports may be a bit higher


Please Check Out My Work at:
Independent Sports News (external link) -- Sports Shooter (external link) --Web Site (external link) -- Facebook (external link) -- iStockphoto.com (external link)--Twitter (external link)
Gear: 1DX; 1D4; 70D gripped; 40D gripped; ; EFS10-22; EFS 17-55; EF 16-35; EF 135; EF 70-200 II; EF 300; EF 1.4X II Extender, 580 EX II Flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ItzBitzHair
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
405 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Ga/SC Boarder
     
May 17, 2008 05:19 |  #18

thnx for the response


www.haasports.info (external link) <- View my gallery !!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
namasste
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,911 posts
Likes: 140
Joined Jul 2007
Location: NE Ohio
     
May 19, 2008 09:43 |  #19

cstewart wrote in post #5532239 (external link)
Itz:

Given the issues around lighting for hockey (in minor rinks) I suspect keeper rates for other sports may be a bit higher

good point, I believe this holds true of any indoor sports shooting. I shot a LAX tourney this past weekend and my keeper rate (defined here as images I'll make available for sale to parents) was about 86% (not counting images deleted while chimping). For indoor hoops, I suspect I shoot closer to 65-70% in a typical HS gym, maybe more in a really good HS or college location.


Scott Evans Photography (external link)
SportsShooterProfile (external link) l MaxPreps Profile (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Aaagogo
Goldmember
Avatar
2,403 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
     
May 19, 2008 09:47 |  #20

i think the process is... well, at least for me,

right in the beginning, you shoot only a few frames, with no keepers

then as you go into more games, you start to shoot alot more frames, with a few keepers

then you realize that it's all about timing and not spray and pray and you start shooting less frames and more keepers.

not really helping much, but i hope my rambling makes sense


https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=4655753&pos​tcount=953 Your 1st 10,000 images are your worst
One photo out of focus is a mistake, ten photo out of focus are an experimentation, one hundred photo out of focus are a style

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,311 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
Keey rate on sports photography
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2707 guests, 171 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.