Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 02 Dec 2004 (Thursday) 03:34
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Please critique these 4 shots (Warning 56k Total size=900kb)

 
Flagpole
Member
112 posts
Joined Mar 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Dec 02, 2004 03:34 |  #1

G'day!

I went shooting today around my unit hopping to refresh some of the previous knowledge. I was trying to achieve something else but the weather did not obliged (strange how after almost a week of near 40C heat, I get an overcast on my day off :) ) I would like to hear any opinion on those 4 shots. They appealed to me but does anyone else find them pleasing. If you had a choice what would you do differently. I'll post the link to the rest of the gallery below. I would dearly like to hear if any of these shots are worth the harddisk space they are on and what worked and what didn't. Here are the 4 shots:

A semi-abondoned (at least from outside) house near by:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Water lilly at Victoria Park next to Sydney Uni. I went 5 years there but never botherred shooting anything as I could not afford a digital camera on student income 8)
IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


And another one
IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Last one for the series are the ducks at the pond. Its funny how ducks are always so photogenic :) I'm thinking they must rank somewhere on the top 10 list of most photographed subjects :wink:
IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


The above are only slightly processed by tweaking curves (white/black point), levels, reducing some obvious noise and slight sharpening via Focus Magic. They were resized using FM WP.

If anyone likes to take detour then I uploaded the rest of the shoot on the webspace http://members.oztrali​a.com/~bfeldman/VP/ (external link) These are unprocessed raw converted but I would dearly love to know if any of them worth any merit. Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Flagpole
Sydney, Australia

Gear: Canon PS G2, SL 420EX, Tiffen Meguplus 0.75x, 2x lenses (which I almost always forget to use), a few filters which I bought to mask any inadequacies in my techniques

G2, 420EX, Tiffen 0.75x & 2.0x, Lumiquest Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lomond
Goldmember
Avatar
2,366 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland
     
Dec 02, 2004 04:24 |  #2

G'day, Flagpole.

I'll concentrate on the shot I like most, if that's OK. No 1, the B&W conversion.

What I like :-

1. The composition. To my eyes the shot is well framed, with the hanging foreground lamp grabbing the attention and then leading the eye to the door and background lamp and beyond.
2. The perspective. Again this is pleasing to the eye.
3. The B&W conversion. This image lends itself well to mono. I find you can't please everyone when it comes to mono, some like more contast, some less, etc, etc. It becomes a personal preference.

What I "might" change.
Not a lot. I might clone out the object on the ground ( bottom left )
I might also clone out the note/sticker behind the foreground lamp.
I would try to straighten the vertical on the right foreground.
I might look for more contrast. ( see no. 3 above ).

I like this shot very much,

Cameron


Cameron........My Images (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flagpole
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
112 posts
Joined Mar 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Dec 02, 2004 15:30 |  #3

G'day!

Not a lot of replies but I've expected as much :(

Lomond, thanks for the time you took to post some critique. I appreciate it. I may go back to the house and try and get other shots from different angles. Its a strange design reminiscent of colonial American style with large wrap around balcony rather than typical Victorian terraces found in Sydney. It looks very run down from the outside and that what grabbed my attention everytime I go past it.

I do like your suggestions and I'll try to do some alternative B&W conversion out of it. I'm not ready to shell out $30 for FM B&W Plug-in yet as I would rarely use 90% of its features, so the two methods I am thinking of trying are by Petteri Sulonen http://194.100.88.243 …ital_Black_and_​White.html (external link) and Glen Mitchell http://www.thelightsri​ght.com …B&WFineArt/B&WF​ineArt.htm (external link).

Here is the quick effort I came up with acting on your suggestions:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


I do find this shot more pleasing but I miss the empty space in front of the foreground lamp :( What do you think?

Flagpole

G2, 420EX, Tiffen 0.75x & 2.0x, Lumiquest Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lomond
Goldmember
Avatar
2,366 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland
     
Dec 03, 2004 16:24 |  #4

Hi, Flagpole.
Or G'day maybe. :wink:

I agree, the space in front of the lamp is needed. That said, I think you did a good job with the verticals, etc. The contrast I like, however I think it's a personal thing. ( some like more some less)
If you are close by I would reshoot since the crop is now too close to the lamp.
I can't put my finger on it but there's somthing about this shot I really like.

Och Aye the Noo, Hoots Mon. :lol:

Cameron


Cameron........My Images (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,013 views & 0 likes for this thread, 2 members have posted to it.
Please critique these 4 shots (Warning 56k Total size=900kb)
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1733 guests, 170 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.