Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Wildlife 
Thread started 04 May 2008 (Sunday) 01:32
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Too post-process or not?

Senior Member
789 posts
Joined Apr 2008
May 04, 2008 01:32 |  #1

Ok, I'm a DSLR noob... this is really from my first outdoor daylight shoot... I'm not really asking for composure help... I know I'll find that with practice... but this weed only looked good from the direction the shot was taken. The flower was very conical and looked really bad from any direction except face-on.

I'm really curious about the amount of post-processing people actually do to their images and if they consider it acceptable, or would rather see unprocessed images...

I'd just like opinions as to what people think is better, original or enhanced?





Canon 40D 10-22mm 24-105L 580 EX II
Canon IIIA LTM Serenar 28mm 3.5
Serenar 50mm 1.8
Leica IIIf RD ST LTM Elmar 50mm 3.5
Nikkor 50mm 1.4
Kodak Brownie No 2

"that rump shot is just adorable"
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009
30,454 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK
May 04, 2008 01:34 |  #2

Original, definitely. Or even perhaps a halfway house.

1D Mark IV | 16-35L f/2.8 II | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 70-200L f/2.8 II | 50 f/1.4 | 600EX-RT and ST-E3-RT
Join the Official POTN UK South-East Thread | Follow me on Twitter (external link) | Tunbridge Wells (external link) | Flickr (external link)

1,823 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Orange County, California
May 04, 2008 01:47 |  #3

I personally say the enhanced...

| Canon 5D Mk II | Canon 17-40MM F/4L | Canon 50MM F/1.4 | Canon 85MM F/1.8 | Canon 580EX II |

Senior Member
250 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Maryland USA
May 04, 2008 04:13 |  #4

I would say some were inbetween the two

Gear List/Feedback
You will be sorry when I'm gone, dead, or armed
Nuclear winter solves global warming! (external link)

Cream of the Crop
7,171 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 53
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Merseyside, England
May 04, 2008 08:01 |  #5

MightyWarMonger wrote in post #5457001 (external link)
I would say some were inbetween the two

Same here.

The original looks a little pale and washed out, it definitely wants a little boost to levels and curves at least. The processed version is a bit over processed to my eye, a little dark on the flower and a tad over saturated. I agree that somewhere in between would be better.

It might also be nice if you can smooth out the background a bit, it looks very cluttered at the moment and takes a lot of impact away from the flower. Some additional blurring would help there. It might also be useful to not darken the background as much as the flower, as that will also help separate them.

Did you shoot the original with the lens wide open?

sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,575 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Too post-process or not?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Wildlife 
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©

Latest registered member is bigtoxy69
1035 guests, 145 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.