roman_t wrote in post #5462628
I like #3,4,7 and one from your page. what lens for 3 and 4? 300mm?
familar name but i dont think i heard his stuff.
Roman, they all have EXIF ... if your browser doesn't have an EXIF viewer you should check the FAQ to find out where to get one. Yes, I think 300mm.
caljimw wrote in post #5462848
You may have your detractors, but count me as not among them. When I look at your shots, I learn. Some old dogs......
René Damkot wrote in post #5462971
#3 and 4 are nice, I don't like #2, 5 and 7 much, rest is okay. Lighting doesn't look too spectacular...
Thanks. I do like to give you a variety and that must include ones you don't like, that much! But I think the problem was the lighting and action were very subdued ... I'm not impressed either.
skifurthur wrote in post #5463110
Usual good job, Dwight. Is # 7 slightly OoF? I am finding that my shorter glass photos all seem that way after a lot of use with the 300.
May be a tad soft but the compression could be the problem. Yes, that damn 300mm f/2.8L IS makes almost any zoom seem mushy! Glad you like yours since I feel somewhat responsible for it!