Was playing with my 24-70 f/2.8L and a friend said the following pics looked soft to him. Shot at f/2.8 (ISO 800) not the best lighting.
No PP just resized.
Thanks in advance.
100% crop (focus on "2")
Jmantyger Senior Member 296 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2007 Location: Prattville, AL USA More info | May 05, 2008 11:59 | #1 Was playing with my 24-70 f/2.8L and a friend said the following pics looked soft to him. Shot at f/2.8 (ISO 800) not the best lighting. 100% crop (focus on "2") 5D MKIII, 16-35L f/4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L II f/2.8 IS, 100-400L II, 430 EX III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
laimis.s Senior Member 568 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: Preston, England More info | May 05, 2008 12:00 | #2 Looks alright, but you may want to do a proper test using one of those diagrams, it will be more accurate. Canon 5D, Mamiya RB-67, Wolf 5x4.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jmantyger THREAD STARTER Senior Member 296 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2007 Location: Prattville, AL USA More info | May 05, 2008 13:42 | #3 laimis.s wrote in post #5464527 Looks alright, but you may want to do a proper test using one of those diagrams, it will be more accurate.
5D MKIII, 16-35L f/4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L II f/2.8 IS, 100-400L II, 430 EX III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DoubleNegative *sniffles* 10,533 posts Likes: 11 Joined Mar 2006 Location: New York, USA More info | May 05, 2008 13:55 | #4 Yes, the 24-70mm is a sharp lens. La Vida Leica!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark_Cohran Cream of the Crop More info | May 05, 2008 14:19 | #5 Looks fine to me given the conditions and the fact you're shooting wide open. Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jmantyger THREAD STARTER Senior Member 296 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2007 Location: Prattville, AL USA More info | May 05, 2008 14:22 | #6 Mark_Cohran wrote in post #5465452 Looks fine to me given the conditions and the fact you're shooting wide open. Thanks Mark. 5D MKIII, 16-35L f/4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L II f/2.8 IS, 100-400L II, 430 EX III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lsquare Goldmember 1,933 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2008 More info | May 10, 2008 17:13 | #7 laimis.s wrote in post #5464527 Looks alright, but you may want to do a proper test using one of those diagrams, it will be more accurate. What diagrams are you talking about?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nanboh Senior Member 614 posts Joined Mar 2007 Location: Midwest US More info | May 10, 2008 18:04 | #8 The image on the candy box probably doesn't look very sharp because the printing on it isn't sharp to begin with--the table edge bottom right looks sharp. I agree, try a better test subject. My 24-70 is sharp wide open at iso 800.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is icebergchick 1395 guests, 164 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||