Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 05 May 2008 (Monday) 12:24
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Would a flash gel help?

 
John ­ E
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,025 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2006
Location: Amarillo, TX
     
May 09, 2008 07:15 |  #16

Thanks guys. Curis' thread is amazing. I wonder if I could have set my shutter to 1/250, ISO 1600 and obliterated the ugly yellow background tungsten light, as Curtis did. Then I wouldn't even have a need for a CTO gel. I'm going to try that next time.


John Elser
Canon 5D MK II; 30D; EF 85 f/1.8; EF 70-200L f/2.8 IS II; EF 24-105L f/4; EF 135L f/2; EF 24-70L; Canon 580 EX II(x3).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Cream of the Crop
6,602 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 1556
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
     
May 09, 2008 09:28 |  #17

Also remember that at full power, your recycle times go up and you will drain the batteries on your flash faster, so carry spares. I suppose it comes down to what kind of shots you want - do you want to light the entire room or focus the lighting on your subject and de-emphasize the rest of the room? With bounce, you have little control over the ratio of light falling on the subject versus the background and little control over the direction of the light if you are bouncing from the ceiling.

The original issue in the thread was the problem with color balance from competing light sources. In Curtis N's thread, he had virtually no competing light sources in the setting where he shot the two stage producers, so his flash, colored by the ceiling upon which he bounced his flash, dictated the relatively uniform color. His exercise was to demonstrate that a 580EXII could be used to bounce off of a high ceiling, not that it would eliminate the issue of multiple color temperature light sources. The flash only had to illuminate the relatively unlit scene, so pushing the ISO gave him the "correct" exposure for his scene. In a setting like the banquet room above, remember that when you shoot full power and increase your ISO, you are going to increase the ambient contribution as well (the pesky tungsten lamps that caused the problem in the first place). So your flash somehow needs to be able to overpower all of the lights in the scene (including the background) if you are going to get a uniform white balance from bouncing our flash only. In this case, you probably want to go to the venue ahead of time and experiment with the bounce to see if you can balance the ambient and flash contributions in manual mode with a combination of shutter speed and ISO. If you can, try to get your subjects to move closer together and crop in tighter on the faces so that most of the extraneous background (like tungsten lamps on walls) is eliminated. Usually, if you need the background in the shot for context of the location or event, then it will (hopefully) be more interesting and you can light it with bounce so that it, and the subject, gets equal emphasis. Remember that, when photographing people, you want a reasonably good representation of skin, so take some reference shots with a white balance card if you are going to bounce. The more locations and surfaces that you use for bounce, the more reference shots you will need if you want to reproduce skin tines properly. Otherwise people may end up looking too blue.

If you can't, then make life easier and get more control over your lighting by using the various CTO or other appropriate gels. This way your white balance reference will not change unless there is an extremely powerful local ambient light source that is different than the gel you choose. Also, get your flash off of the camera hotshoe to give your lighting a little more directionality, and maybe an 80/20 bounce or mini-softbox. You will have much more control of your light and the extra gear is compact and relatively inexpensive. If you use all of these techniques, your shots will also have more variety.

Good luck,

Kirk

PS -Read this case study to help understand balancing ambient fill and flash:
http://strobist.blogsp​ot.com …olling-daylight-pt-1.html (external link)


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ E
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,025 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2006
Location: Amarillo, TX
     
May 09, 2008 10:26 |  #18

Thanks for the excellent explanation Kirk. I've order some 1/2 CTO gels and will try to experiment with them. During this shoot, I took many pictures of a VIP shaking hands with different individuals near a wall. For those shots I did use an umbrella off to my left and used another 580 ex II with a ratio of 4:1. Those pictures came out wonderful. It was only the pictures that the flash had to compete with the tungsten background that the light color temperature is drastic. You would think that someone would invent a gel that fits on a camera better than having to tape it on or use velcro (or have a flash that changes color temperature). Wouldn't that be wonderful?


John Elser
Canon 5D MK II; 30D; EF 85 f/1.8; EF 70-200L f/2.8 IS II; EF 24-105L f/4; EF 135L f/2; EF 24-70L; Canon 580 EX II(x3).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Cream of the Crop
6,602 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 1556
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
     
May 09, 2008 10:31 |  #19

A flash that changes color temp?! You and your Nobel Prize - go get it! I think the key to all of this is to experiment after finding enough info to get you most of the way there. Sounds like you have plenty of gear and knowhow. Have fun!

Kirk


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,479 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Would a flash gel help?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1393 guests, 165 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.