I am going to be shooting a wedding here soon and I am looking for something a bit on the wider end for some of the shots. I wanted to see some examples from the 16-35 on a crop body(20D equivalent) at the wide end. Thanks a bunch
jtmorales Goldmember 1,212 posts Joined Apr 2005 Location: Colorado More info | May 06, 2008 15:08 | #1 I am going to be shooting a wedding here soon and I am looking for something a bit on the wider end for some of the shots. I wanted to see some examples from the 16-35 on a crop body(20D equivalent) at the wide end. Thanks a bunch
LOG IN TO REPLY |
QX56 Senior Member  774 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: Warren,Michigan. More info | May 06, 2008 17:01 | #2 Here you go , I shot the wedding on couple day ago with Mark III + 16-35 f/2.8 II .  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. 1D MK III,40D,G12.1Ds mk3.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
QX56 Senior Member 774 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: Warren,Michigan. More info | Also another one I shot couple week ago with scott ,this time I was second shooter for scott .  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. 1D MK III,40D,G12.1Ds mk3.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AnalogoftheWolf Junior Member 23 posts Joined May 2008 More info | May 06, 2008 17:28 | #4 Has anyone shot the lens on a body with a crop factor of 1.6x? if so, can you provide some images as well? I'm probably going to buy it regardless but couldn't hurt to see some pictures. =T Canon 40D, Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 Macro, Canon 70-200mm F2.8L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
noobzor Member 145 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: SLC, UT More info | May 06, 2008 18:50 | #5 Analog of the Wolf wrote in post #5473606  Has anyone shot the lens on a body with a crop factor of 1.6x? if so, can you provide some images as well? I'm probably going to buy it regardless but couldn't hurt to see some pictures. =T I LOVED mine, i just sold it becouse i wanted a more usable combo for what i shoot.    7D, G10 , 50 1.8 , 28-75 2.8 , 12-28 4.0, ex430
LOG IN TO REPLY |
timnosenzo Cream of the Crop 8,833 posts Likes: 14 Joined Sep 2005 Location: CT More info | May 06, 2008 20:51 | #6 What are you planning on shooting with it? It's a sweet lens, but IMO it looses a bit of its luster on a 1.6x body, since its range is pretty short, and its not particularly wide and not particularly long. Personally for a 1.6x body I'd spring for a Canon 10-22 and a Canon 17-55 f/2.8 IS and kind of get the best of both worlds--nice IQ and usability. Just some thoughts! connecticut wedding photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gorby Senior Member 531 posts Joined Mar 2007 More info | May 06, 2008 23:23 | #7 is 16mm a dramatic step away from 18mm? 5D MKII | 650D [SIZE=2][SIZE=2][SIZE=1]| 350D (RIP)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AnalogoftheWolf Junior Member 23 posts Joined May 2008 More info | May 07, 2008 00:02 | #8 thanx a bunch, noobzor! Canon 40D, Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 Macro, Canon 70-200mm F2.8L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AnalogoftheWolf Junior Member 23 posts Joined May 2008 More info | May 07, 2008 00:09 | #9 hmm, i was thinking about getting it to just have when i go to full frame but i dunno when that'll be and by that time there'll probly be L III or some other crazy new superwide lens. might just have to go for that ef-s 10-22mm. or just sell my sigma 18-50 and replace it with the L, really dunno now. Canon 40D, Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 Macro, Canon 70-200mm F2.8L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
timnosenzo Cream of the Crop 8,833 posts Likes: 14 Joined Sep 2005 Location: CT More info | May 07, 2008 05:33 | #10 Analog of the Wolf wrote in post #5475826 ... i dunno when that'll be and by that time there'll probly be L III or some other crazy new superwide lens... While you're probably always best served by buying what is best for you now since resale value is pretty good on lenses (especially if you're buying used), lenses don't get updated or replaced nearly as often as bodies. I have lenses in my bag that were designed 20 years ago (15mm fisheye)! The original 16-35 was never a great lens in most cases, so I think Canon knew it needed an updating. IMO they did a good job with the MK II version. connecticut wedding photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AnalogoftheWolf Junior Member 23 posts Joined May 2008 More info | May 07, 2008 11:55 | #11 timnosenzo wrote in post #5476609 While you're probably always best served by buying what is best for you now since resale value is pretty good on lenses (especially if you're buying used), lenses don't get updated or replaced nearly as often as bodies. I have lenses in my bag that were designed 20 years ago (15mm fisheye)! The original 16-35 was never a great lens in most cases, so I think Canon knew it needed an updating. IMO they did a good job with the MK II version. good to know, thanx tim! think i might get the 70-200 IS for my 40D instead since i shoot indoor sports and weddings occasionally. Canon 40D, Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 Macro, Canon 70-200mm F2.8L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RenéDamkot Cream of the Crop  39,856 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2005 Location: enschede, netherlands More info | May 07, 2008 12:31 | #12 timnosenzo wrote in post #5474720 What are you planning on shooting with it? It's a sweet lens, but IMO it looses a bit of its luster on a 1.6x body, since its range is pretty short, and its not particularly wide and not particularly long. Personally for a 1.6x body I'd spring for a Canon 10-22 and a Canon 17-55 f/2.8 IS and kind of get the best of both worlds--nice IQ and usability. Just some thoughts! Agree 100% "I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
QX56 Senior Member 774 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: Warren,Michigan. More info | 2 more At 16mm (mark III + 16-35)  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. 1D MK III,40D,G12.1Ds mk3.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 860 guests, 166 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
