Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 07 May 2008 (Wednesday) 15:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Budget sports lenses?

 
primalcarl
Senior Member
490 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Devon, UK
     
May 07, 2008 15:26 |  #1

I like to take sports photos (running, cycling particularly) and am not sure what to buy next. I'm getting into sport event photography so need good, crisp images

I currently have a 70-200 F4L and it produces stunning results. Is it worth buying the 2.8 version for the extra speed? What other lenses are good for sports?

My budget is around £650 or $1300


http://csimages.daport​folio.com/ (external link)
My Flickr (external link)
Canon 550D 15-85 70-300L 430exII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BIG ­ H
Senior Member
708 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Wisconsin USA
     
May 07, 2008 15:30 |  #2

The 2.8 version is worth having, however consider a 24-70 f/2.8 canon or sigma first.


7D, 40D, 20D, S5is, canon: 100-400LIS, 70-200 f2.8L, 18-55 EFS, 17-55 f2.8 IS EFS, 28-135 IS, 70-300 f4-5.6 IS, 50 f1.4, 85 f1.8, 135 f2.0; sigma: 24-70 EX DG macro; tokina: 10-17 fisheye; 580EX II, 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
packpe89
Senior Member
Avatar
733 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2007
Location: North Carolina
     
May 07, 2008 15:42 |  #3

I do alot of sports, my favorite lens is the 300 F4, (mine is the older non-IS). It is light fast AF and sharp. I also have the 70-200 2.8 ISand use it as well, but unless I am shooting on a small field, I like the 300F4 better. I also use a 85/1.8 for indoor alot. I use to have a Sigma 50-500, very versital and sharp considering the range, but after I got the 300, i rarely used it.

BTW, the older version of the 300F4 can be found in the $600 range, so it is not a budget buster either.

Joe


Canon 5D, 7D, 100-300F4, 200f2.8L, 17-40L, 50f1.4, 85f1.8, 15-85EF-S , Sigma 24-70f2.8, A couple of flashes, strobes and stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elysium
"full of stupid banter"
Avatar
11,619 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Harrow/London/UK/GB/That Part Of The World/Next To France
     
May 07, 2008 15:49 |  #4

In all honesty, buying the 70-200 2.8 will not immediately make your photos even better. The 2.8 will help you to work with faster shutter speeds and better for low light however both seem to be as sharp as each other IMO.


Everyday, a programmer finds a way of creating an idiotproof program. Everyday, the universe spits out another idiot.....So far, the universe if winning

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
George ­ E.
Member
241 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: Medford, NJ
     
May 07, 2008 16:29 as a reply to  @ elysium's post |  #5

I currently have a 70-200 f/4 and I used to have a 70-200 f/2.8 both Canon. I found the f/4 both sharper and the AF was better. I had a higher hit rate with the f/4. The 2.8 won't make your pictures any better unless you NEED the 2.8 due to lack of light ;)

I recently bought another 2.8 to shoot indoors, maybe this copy will be sharper than my last one. My f/4 is soooo razor sharp and AF is so perfect I'll probably keep it for my outdoor sports. But maybe my f/4 is just exceptional???

George




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canoncad
Senior Member
372 posts
Joined May 2007
     
May 07, 2008 18:25 as a reply to  @ George E.'s post |  #6

300 f4 :eek:


Fairfax Virginia

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon ­ Soldier
..."kind of like Zooms"?
803 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Arrested with no pants in the nuthouse
     
May 07, 2008 20:52 |  #7

well isn't it obvious?? just order the 1200mm f/5.6L from BH for 99k and you can save money on gas because you'll be stting on your back porch shooting the game!


Na, just kidding, you are still a loser.
^^ If you higlight this you will be cool ^^

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
May 07, 2008 20:55 |  #8

I think the 300/4 pairs up well with a 70-200 for sports, and it meets your budget.

Add a 1.4X TC down the road and you can shoot 70-200/4, 300/4 and 420/5.6


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NeoMikel
Senior Member
Avatar
291 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Southern UT
     
May 07, 2008 21:01 |  #9

Canon Soldier wrote in post #5481758 (external link)
well isn't it obvious?? just order the 1200mm f/5.6L from BH for 99k and you can save money on gas because you'll be stting on your back porch shooting the game!

hahaha. made me laugh.


http://dalby.smugmug.c​om (external link)
http://dalberti.devian​tart.com (external link)
Gear: Canon EOS 30D, Canon 300mm f/4L, Sigma 10-22mm f/4-5.6, Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di, Manfrotto 190XB

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Savas ­ K
Goldmember
1,425 posts
Joined May 2007
     
May 07, 2008 22:05 |  #10

I thought he was serious and went to B&H's site to check it out. :(




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,442 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Budget sports lenses?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2904 guests, 165 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.