Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 07 May 2008 (Wednesday) 19:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

ExpoDisc vs. PhotoVision Digital Calibration Target

 
CarolinaMoon
Member
Avatar
117 posts
Joined Mar 2007
     
May 07, 2008 19:37 |  #1

Last night I went to the Ed Pierce Captivated By Light seminar in Raleigh, NC. Ed was sharing with us his invention to digitally calibrate your custom white balance with his Calibration Target (http://www.photovision​video.com …_Code=P&Categor​y_Code=DCT (external link)). Some folks around me swore by this thing and do not go anywhere without it.

I have been an ExpoDisc user for about a year and thought that this was a very accurate custom white balance. Can anyone explain to me the differences either pros or cons between using the PhotoVision product and the ExpoDisc? Thanks in advance.


Canon 1D Mark III~Canon 30D~BG-E2 Grip~100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM~70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM~EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM~EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM~35mm f/1.8L~EF 50mm f/1.8 II~580 EX~Gary Fong LSII~ThinkTank Gear~AlienBees ABR800 w/30" & 56"MU~AlienBees AB800s~Adobe Lightroom 2.0~DxO 5.0~Dfine 2.0

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jason ­ Kim
Senior Member
293 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles
     
May 07, 2008 20:15 |  #2

I carry both ExpoDisc and Photovision. I prefer to use Expodisc in single light situations or in controlled light situations like in studio. I find I can get more consistent WB with it. However, I use PhotoVision when I use bounced flash or in multiple lighting situations.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon ­ Soldier
..."kind of like Zooms"?
803 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Arrested with no pants in the nuthouse
     
May 07, 2008 20:53 |  #3

cant you just use a white sheet of paper?


Na, just kidding, you are still a loser.
^^ If you higlight this you will be cool ^^

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jason ­ Kim
Senior Member
293 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles
     
May 07, 2008 21:30 |  #4

Canon Soldier wrote in post #5481763 (external link)
cant you just use a white sheet of paper?

Well, I certainly wouldn't. I spent so much $$$ on good dslr and lenses. I want my photos to free of color cast. White papers have different color cast to them. What I want is accuracy and consistency of white balance. For me, it's the consistency of skin tones across the series of photos. If I go with Auto WB route or something less than neutral, I tend to spend more time tweaking each shots in RAW converters. I rather spend doing something else than trying to match up skin tones shot after shot.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnJ80
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,442 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2006
     
May 07, 2008 22:12 |  #5

Canon Soldier wrote in post #5481763 (external link)
cant you just use a white sheet of paper?

ever go and look at the "white" paint chips at the paint store? There is a gazillion of them. Same problem with the "white" of paper. You can just be trading one color cast for another.

J.


Obsessive Gear List
"It isn't what you don't know that gets you in trouble; it's what you know for sure that isn't so." - Mark Twain

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Strayz
Senior Member
Avatar
691 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Alaska
     
May 08, 2008 11:36 |  #6

Jason Kim wrote in post #5481962 (external link)
Well, I certainly wouldn't. I spent so much $$$ on good dslr and lenses. I want my photos to free of color cast. White papers have different color cast to them. What I want is accuracy and consistency of white balance. For me, it's the consistency of skin tones across the series of photos. If I go with Auto WB route or something less than neutral, I tend to spend more time tweaking each shots in RAW converters. I rather spend doing something else than trying to match up skin tones shot after shot.

You could still use paper, just use the same piece of paper if you need consistency. You are using the same target all the time, same principal. I do wonder about the photographers that use the same target all the time and shoot on location with it possably getting dirty.. That could itself cause all sorts of white balance as well.

I went to see the Ed Pierce show as well, and I did not get an explanation to my satisfaction on what is so dam special about the white he uses. I did hear about the grey, and black though.

I have both the target and the Expo disk (Won one of them as a door prize and the other for raising my hand at different seminars than the one he was at), they both get you close enough. Color cast means you are not seeing the color as it is or something in your post process may need to be looked at possibly one of your light sources could be off as well, and / or muixed lighting.

We have Light room, DPP, Photoshop, ect to correct white balance issues and I will agree it is nice to not have to touch each image.Getting it right in camera is a huge time saver, and both the target and the expodisk will let you set it in the camera.


Back to learning after a 5ish year break from photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ShotByTom
Goldmember
Avatar
3,050 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 136
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Indianapolis
     
May 08, 2008 11:58 |  #7

Jason Kim wrote in post #5481531 (external link)
I carry both ExpoDisc and Photovision. I prefer to use Expodisc in single light situations or in controlled light situations like in studio. I find I can get more consistent WB with it. However, I use PhotoVision when I use bounced flash or in multiple lighting situations.

This is confusing to me. I went to a seminar here in Indy and they demo'd the expodisc. They had a flash, a florescent light and a tungsten light on the model and showed how the expodisc worked, and it was excellent. Why wouldn't you use it for multiple light sources?

I'll have to go back and do some reading, but I thought that was one of the benefits of expodisc, it sets your whitebalance based on available light..


Gear
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CarolinaMoon
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
117 posts
Joined Mar 2007
     
May 10, 2008 08:31 as a reply to  @ ShotByTom's post |  #8

Thanks all for replying to my thread.

a521...good question and hopefully someone will be able to answer it.


Canon 1D Mark III~Canon 30D~BG-E2 Grip~100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM~70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM~EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM~EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM~35mm f/1.8L~EF 50mm f/1.8 II~580 EX~Gary Fong LSII~ThinkTank Gear~AlienBees ABR800 w/30" & 56"MU~AlienBees AB800s~Adobe Lightroom 2.0~DxO 5.0~Dfine 2.0

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,948 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
ExpoDisc vs. PhotoVision Digital Calibration Target
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1001 guests, 177 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.