toneyw wrote in post #5484966
You can use a P & S if you're really serious. . .
quite true, especially landscapes and such. the only reasons to go for a better body are:
durability- your xsi is a chunk of plastic with a metal mount, a 1d is a solid piece of magnesium alloy
fps- in certain sports, fps does matter. while you can get away with just single shots, you'll get more sell-able photos with some spamming (and if you know your camera's timing well enough, you can get shots before, the shot you want, and shots after-i.e. tennis ball before, on impact, and after)
battery life- mkiii>40d>450d in terms of battery life. i can often get 4500 shots/charge on my mkiii
authority-for smaller gigs, having a big camera means people tend to be more respectful of your space and will likely help you get your job done. exceptions:NYC, where people will kick you out so their p&s can get a very blurry photo of an even blurrier subject. also, if everyone has X0D and up cameras, only your skill will matter. worst comes to worst get a vertical grip for your xsi
edit: some of my most profitable shots were taken with an xt and 17-85IS. no reason why an xsi would be worse.
I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List