Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 12 Dec 2004 (Sunday) 01:59
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Which one works better?

 
Flagpole
Member
112 posts
Joined Mar 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Dec 12, 2004 01:59 |  #1

G'day!

Just wondering which one works better in terms of composition between these 2 images?

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


and

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


I wasn't trying to compose them in any special way at the time but they came out following the basic composition rules. I am debating as to which one I find more pleasing.

Flagpole
Sydney, Australia

G2, 420EX, Tiffen 0.75x & 2.0x, Lumiquest Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
klinz
Member
101 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Nov 2003
Location: new york
     
Dec 12, 2004 02:09 |  #2

number 2 i like.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MilesG
Senior Member
Avatar
253 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Grantham, England, UK
     
Dec 12, 2004 02:10 |  #3

i feel the first is the best


Web Address: http://www.milesgreen.​co.uk
E-Mail Address: mail@milesgreen.co.uk
Miles Green
Lincolnshire
England
UK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 12, 2004 02:23 as a reply to  @ MilesG's post |  #4

I like #2 best, #1 I find bland and boring (no offense, of course).


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sparker1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
29,368 posts
Likes: 295
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
     
Dec 12, 2004 05:55 as a reply to  @ tim's post |  #5

I like Number 2.


Stan (See my gallery at http://www.pbase.com/s​parker1 (external link))

7D, 50D, 300D, EF-S 10-22 mm, EF-S 18-55 mm kit lens, EF 24-105 L IS, EF 50 mm 1.8, Sigma 150-500mm (Bigmos)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
arumdevil
Senior Member
Avatar
649 posts
Joined May 2004
Location: UK
     
Dec 12, 2004 09:11 as a reply to  @ sparker1's post |  #6

I find the first one too "in yer face".

but the second one is fantastic!!!


Regards, arum.
"Originality is merely an illusion" M.C.Escher

6D | 50 f/1.4 USM | 28 f/1.8 USM | 24 f/2.8 | 70-210 f/4 | YN560-II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Big_B
Cream of the Crop
Honorary Moderator
Avatar
4,586 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2004
Location: London, UK
     
Dec 12, 2004 09:59 as a reply to  @ arumdevil's post |  #7

I really like them both. They have very different feelings, but I think both work in their own right.


www.pbase.com/sam_blac​kie (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cmar
Member
49 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Location: California, no really
     
Dec 12, 2004 10:00 as a reply to  @ arumdevil's post |  #8

#2 is better to me, I find myself looking at and enjoying it much longer.
It still has the wonderful shape that #1 has dominating it, but it gives much more for the eye to peruse, without being cluttered.
In #1 the building in the background is a distraction, in #2 it adds to the scene.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Olegis
Goldmember
Avatar
2,073 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Israel
     
Dec 12, 2004 10:58 as a reply to  @ cmar's post |  #9

I like the second one better. In the first one there is a fragment of the building which goes up and then is cropped (upper right side). The second one is just beautiful, I like the fuzzy effect.


Best wishes,
Oleg.

www.Olegis.com (external link)
My equipment list
'I take orders from no one except the photographers' – Harry S Truman

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wpez72
Member
Avatar
34 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Southend-on-Sea, Essex, UK
     
Dec 12, 2004 11:29 |  #10

The second does it for me, i like the use of the gaps in the pavement as leading lines, drawing you into the picture..

Will


Canon EOS 300D
efs18-55 kit lens, Old ef75-300 USM II, Old ef28-80 USM I, Pentax Super Takumar 50mm 1.4
Velbon Sherpa 600n.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jacob
Member
141 posts
Joined Oct 2004
     
Dec 12, 2004 11:33 as a reply to  @ wpez72's post |  #11

Second one


http://pixel-plus.deviantart.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,455 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
Dec 12, 2004 11:52 |  #12

I concur with the others in preferring No. 2, however that preference is a "just barely" preference. I really liked both shots, and I like the postprocessing. Please share the steps in getting this. I am guessing multiple layers with at least one layer having a Gaussian Blur? Is that correct?

Rad


.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
defordphoto
MKIII Aficionado
9,888 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2002
Location: Pacific Northwest
     
Dec 12, 2004 13:15 |  #13

#2 for sure. With #1 you kinda wonder, "What the heck is that?" With #2 you say, "Ahhhh, yeah. I know that." Nice comp on #2. The concrete gaps are nice. Weird, but nice effects.


defordphoto | Celebrating the art of photography®
SD500, 10D, 20D, 30D, 5D, 1DMKII, 1DMKIII
www.ussbaracing.com (external link) | www.rfmsports.com (external link) | www.nwfjcc.com (external link)
An austere and pleasant poetry of the real. Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ranger187
Senior Member
Avatar
486 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2004
Location: NV / PA
     
Dec 12, 2004 13:27 as a reply to  @ defordphoto's post |  #14

#2 is softer on the eyes and perceives a ghost like appearance. Of it could be the beer that I drank last night is still altering my vision. ;)


BLOG (external link)
Flickr (external link)
[Canon A75][Canon Pro1][Canon EOS-70D] | GEAR

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flagpole
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
112 posts
Joined Mar 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Dec 12, 2004 13:48 as a reply to  @ defordphoto's post |  #15

G'day all!

Thank you all for the replies. Now you see my dilema :) I like #1 because of strong shapes. It relies on familiarity with the subject but like Arumdevil says its "in you face" but the wonderful texture on the Opera House walls then grabs your eye.

I love #2 cause it really shows the scene. Its has background/foreground elements, leading lines and open space. I was thinking of cropping the bin out but then I thought hey this ain't the essence of phtography. Hence it adds to the scene to me by making it less sterile. I think as far as visual impact #2 would be probably a better choice to hang on the wall.

I'm in the processs of finally ready to order some 12x18in to hang and thats just one of the choices. Now all I need to do is get other 3 nailed down :)

Radtech: I can't claim the credit for the post-processing. That a PS Action called Midnigh Sepia by Dave Jaseck. It is available from this link with examples http://www.atncentral.​com/download.htm#Frame​s (external link) . People have been combining it with "Paintinf with Light" to get some wonderful effects http://forums.dpreview​.com …rum=1005&messag​e=11304683 (external link) (check the authot gallery out for some other examples) that you can see at Dpreview Retouching forums (ny refuge when this wonderful forum was down). I hope you find it useful.

Thank you all for all replies agaun,

Regards,
Flagpole


G2, 420EX, Tiffen 0.75x & 2.0x, Lumiquest Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,373 views & 0 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it.
Which one works better?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1733 guests, 169 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.