Still working on my close-up technique. Critique is appreciated.
1. Aster with little visitor
![]() | Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE |
2. Periwinkle
![]() | Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE |
Thank you.
Mark
ImageMogul Senior Member 596 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2007 Location: Tennessee More info | May 09, 2008 01:38 | #1 Still working on my close-up technique. Critique is appreciated.
2. Periwinkle
Thank you. Mark “Composition can’t be reduced to a set of rules ... Dissonance has its place in photography as well as music. If we confined ourselves to major and minor scales, the blues wouldn’t exist. Rules are tools, not laws.” ~ James Martin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chappie Member 85 posts Joined Oct 2007 Location: Gloucestershire, UK More info | May 09, 2008 17:15 | #2 I love the first image, hope you dont mind if I suggest a slight change... Photo-blog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
better The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ghosh Senior Member 874 posts Joined Sep 2005 Location: Edinburgh More info | May 09, 2008 18:42 | #4 I like the crop version. #include <iostream>
LOG IN TO REPLY |
samanan Member 107 posts Joined Apr 2008 More info | May 09, 2008 21:22 | #5 The cropped one is much better.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kuma1212 Senior Member 364 posts Joined Jun 2007 Location: Chicago More info | I was thinking the same thing about the crop and then I scrolled down and it was there! #2 looks overly sharpened. Did you sharpen it? 5DII. 50L. 24-70LII. 16-35LII. 70-200is2.8II. 100L 135L.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
WalczakPhoto Goldmember 1,034 posts Joined Apr 2008 More info | May 10, 2008 13:57 | #7 The repost of #1 wasn't "cropped"...the back ground was cleaned up with the stem or bud or whatever it was, removed. Well done too but I would have gone just a bit further and got the stem out of the left side of the picture as well. "It is horrifying that we have to fight our own government to save the environment. " - Ansel Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
midnitejam Senior Member 806 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Parma Ohio More info | I like both crops of the first, but my take on it is that it could be improved if the first one were cropped to the triangular rule of composition Midnitejam--The happiness in your life depends on the quality of your thoughts.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 10, 2008 14:21 | #9 chappie wrote in post #5493669 I love the first image, hope you dont mind if I suggest a slight change... Don't mind a bit, chappie! Thank you. chauncey wrote in post #5493753 better ghosh wrote in post #5494013 I like the crop version. Thanks for the comments, guys. If you make it back to this thread, would you mind (samanan too) elaborating a bit on your preference to edit out the oof bud in the upper right? I thought perhaps it helped give the composition balance. Do your feel it doesn't contribute to the composition? Distraction? Other? This would help a great deal. Thanks again. samanan wrote in post #5494771 The cropped one is much better. The second shot is oversaturated and over exposed. Have noticed that Canons have a tendency to over saturate reds and blues (especially in flowers). Have run into this problem a number of times especially while photographing tulips. Don't know how to avoid it though. Thanks for taking the time to comment, samanan. Could back down on the saturation a little... Can you give me an idea of why the photo looks over-exposed to you? Thanks again. kuma1212 wrote in post #5496623 #2 looks overly sharpened. Did you sharpen it? Hey kuma. Thanks for the comment. Yes, I selectively sharpened the flower only to help it "pop" from the background. I tried not to oversharpen. I'll blow up several areas and take a closer look. Thank you. “Composition can’t be reduced to a set of rules ... Dissonance has its place in photography as well as music. If we confined ourselves to major and minor scales, the blues wouldn’t exist. Rules are tools, not laws.” ~ James Martin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 10, 2008 15:24 | #10 Walczak Photo wrote in post #5498043 The repost of #1 wasn't "cropped"...the back ground was cleaned up with the stem or bud or whatever it was, removed. Well done too but I would have gone just a bit further and got the stem out of the left side of the picture as well. I like the look of #2...to me it doesn't look over sharpened to me as much as just the texture of the flower. It does look maybe a tich grainy perhaps...high ISO maybe? Oddly enough, I think this shot would work better landscape instead of portrait, but that's just an artistic opinion. Peace, Jim Thanks Jim. The flower had more "texture" than desirable in the original photo. My Mother-in-law had been burning leaves right next to it and it had been dusted with ash (the larger particles which I "healed" out). Interesting idea of converting to landscape - included a rotated version for reference.
midnitejam wrote in post #5498045 I like both crops of the first, but my take on it is that it could be improved if the first one were cropped to the triangular rule of composition I like the saturation and the comp in the 2nd shot. I like how the sharpness brings out the detail. Nice shots as they are. Changes may not necessarily be improvements, just different. Appreciate the comments midnite. “Composition can’t be reduced to a set of rules ... Dissonance has its place in photography as well as music. If we confined ourselves to major and minor scales, the blues wouldn’t exist. Rules are tools, not laws.” ~ James Martin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chappie Member 85 posts Joined Oct 2007 Location: Gloucestershire, UK More info | May 12, 2008 17:38 | #11 The oof bud in the upper right draws the eye away from the two flower heads. Just an example of less is more. Glad you liked. Photo-blog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2648 guests, 174 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||