Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 09 May 2008 (Friday) 01:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Aster & Periwinkle

 
ImageMogul
Senior Member
Avatar
596 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Tennessee
     
May 09, 2008 01:38 |  #1

Still working on my close-up technique. Critique is appreciated.

1. Aster with little visitor

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE



2. Periwinkle
IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Thank you.
Mark

Composition can’t be reduced to a set of rules ... Dissonance has its place in photography as well as music. If we confined ourselves to major and minor scales, the blues wouldn’t exist. Rules are tools, not laws.” ~ James Martin
http://www.imagemogul.​smugmug.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chappie
Member
85 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Gloucestershire, UK
     
May 09, 2008 17:15 |  #2

I love the first image, hope you dont mind if I suggest a slight change...

IMAGE: http://i292.photobucket.com/albums/mm23/photocoffeebuzz/290791126_AUToZ-L.jpg

Photo-blog

www.pictorialise.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 467
Joined Jun 2007
Location: MI/CO
     
May 09, 2008 17:27 as a reply to  @ chappie's post |  #3

better


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ghosh
Senior Member
Avatar
874 posts
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Edinburgh
     
May 09, 2008 18:42 |  #4

I like the crop version.


#include <iostream>
int main() {
std::cout << "POTN is the best." << std::endl;
return 0; }


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
samanan
Member
107 posts
Joined Apr 2008
     
May 09, 2008 21:22 |  #5

The cropped one is much better.

The second shot is oversaturated and over exposed. Have noticed that Canons have a tendency to over saturate reds and blues (especially in flowers). Have run into this problem a number of times especially while photographing tulips. Don't know how to avoid it though.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kuma1212
Senior Member
364 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Chicago
     
May 10, 2008 08:13 as a reply to  @ samanan's post |  #6

I was thinking the same thing about the crop and then I scrolled down and it was there! #2 looks overly sharpened. Did you sharpen it?


5DII. 50L. 24-70LII. 16-35LII. 70-200is2.8II. 100L 135L.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Walczak ­ Photo
Goldmember
1,034 posts
Joined Apr 2008
     
May 10, 2008 13:57 |  #7

The repost of #1 wasn't "cropped"...the back ground was cleaned up with the stem or bud or whatever it was, removed. Well done too but I would have gone just a bit further and got the stem out of the left side of the picture as well.

I like the look of #2...to me it doesn't look over sharpened to me as much as just the texture of the flower. It does look maybe a tich grainy perhaps...high ISO maybe? Oddly enough, I think this shot would work better landscape instead of portrait, but that's just an artistic opinion.

Peace,
Jim


"It is horrifying that we have to fight our own government to save the environment. " - Ansel Adams
Walczak Photography - www.walczakphoto.izfre​e.com (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
midnitejam
Senior Member
806 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Parma Ohio
     
May 10, 2008 13:57 as a reply to  @ kuma1212's post |  #8

I like both crops of the first, but my take on it is that it could be improved if the first one were cropped to the triangular rule of composition

I like the saturation and the comp in the 2nd shot. I like how the sharpness brings out the detail.

Nice shots as they are. Changes may not necessarily be improvements, just different.


Midnitejam--The happiness in your life depends on the quality of your thoughts.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ImageMogul
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
596 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Tennessee
     
May 10, 2008 14:21 |  #9

chappie wrote in post #5493669 (external link)
I love the first image, hope you dont mind if I suggest a slight change...

Don't mind a bit, chappie! Thank you.

chauncey wrote in post #5493753 (external link)
better

ghosh wrote in post #5494013 (external link)
I like the crop version.

Thanks for the comments, guys. If you make it back to this thread, would you mind (samanan too) elaborating a bit on your preference to edit out the oof bud in the upper right? I thought perhaps it helped give the composition balance. Do your feel it doesn't contribute to the composition? Distraction? Other? This would help a great deal. Thanks again.

samanan wrote in post #5494771 (external link)
The cropped one is much better.

The second shot is oversaturated and over exposed. Have noticed that Canons have a tendency to over saturate reds and blues (especially in flowers). Have run into this problem a number of times especially while photographing tulips. Don't know how to avoid it though.

Thanks for taking the time to comment, samanan. Could back down on the saturation a little... Can you give me an idea of why the photo looks over-exposed to you? Thanks again.

kuma1212 wrote in post #5496623 (external link)
#2 looks overly sharpened. Did you sharpen it?

Hey kuma. Thanks for the comment. Yes, I selectively sharpened the flower only to help it "pop" from the background. I tried not to oversharpen. I'll blow up several areas and take a closer look. Thank you.

Guys, thanks for helping me to think more critically concerning my photos. Much appreciated.

Best Regards.

Mark


Composition can’t be reduced to a set of rules ... Dissonance has its place in photography as well as music. If we confined ourselves to major and minor scales, the blues wouldn’t exist. Rules are tools, not laws.” ~ James Martin
http://www.imagemogul.​smugmug.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ImageMogul
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
596 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Tennessee
     
May 10, 2008 15:24 |  #10

Walczak Photo wrote in post #5498043 (external link)
The repost of #1 wasn't "cropped"...the back ground was cleaned up with the stem or bud or whatever it was, removed. Well done too but I would have gone just a bit further and got the stem out of the left side of the picture as well.

I like the look of #2...to me it doesn't look over sharpened to me as much as just the texture of the flower. It does look maybe a tich grainy perhaps...high ISO maybe? Oddly enough, I think this shot would work better landscape instead of portrait, but that's just an artistic opinion.

Peace,
Jim

Thanks Jim. The flower had more "texture" than desirable in the original photo. My Mother-in-law had been burning leaves right next to it and it had been dusted with ash (the larger particles which I "healed" out). Interesting idea of converting to landscape - included a rotated version for reference.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

midnitejam wrote in post #5498045 (external link)
I like both crops of the first, but my take on it is that it could be improved if the first one were cropped to the triangular rule of composition

I like the saturation and the comp in the 2nd shot. I like how the sharpness brings out the detail.

Nice shots as they are. Changes may not necessarily be improvements, just different.

Appreciate the comments midnite.

Mark


Composition can’t be reduced to a set of rules ... Dissonance has its place in photography as well as music. If we confined ourselves to major and minor scales, the blues wouldn’t exist. Rules are tools, not laws.” ~ James Martin
http://www.imagemogul.​smugmug.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chappie
Member
85 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Gloucestershire, UK
     
May 12, 2008 17:38 |  #11

The oof bud in the upper right draws the eye away from the two flower heads. Just an example of less is more. Glad you liked.


Photo-blog

www.pictorialise.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,343 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Aster & Periwinkle
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2775 guests, 173 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.