Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 12 Dec 2004 (Sunday) 08:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

EOS 1D Mark II exposure problem

 
kndreyn
Member
160 posts
Joined Nov 2004
     
Dec 12, 2004 08:26 |  #1

I bought a 1D MkII and the 580EX flash unit a couple of weeks ago. I'm having a little problem with exposures using the flash. Everything is coming out underexposed unless I press the FE L button. Pressing that fixes the exposure. So while experimenting with it, I bumped the flash up 1 full stop and that gave me a good exposure, but if I press the FE L button with the flash increased, the pictures are overexposed. I took the camera back to the shop where I bought it, and they were puzzled too. They said the latest firmware was supposed to have corrected these problems. Has anyone else been seeing this with your 1D MkII? BTW - it does the same thing with my 550 EX flash.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dobova
Member
Avatar
57 posts
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Italy
     
Dec 12, 2004 09:12 |  #2

Dear kndreyn,
I face same problem with 550ex and 1D MKII. Search the forum, you'll find lot of thread about this problem and also lot of explanation on how to expose correctly. There also very useful explanation about Canon EOS and flash coupling, exposure and technical details.

Ciao
Dome


Dome
----------
Canon rigs & lenses, filters & bags, few batteries & CF. No more
The only flash I use is God's Sun, other brand are simply fakes.
http://dobova86.fotki.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
charlesu
Goldmember
Avatar
4,320 posts
Likes: 121
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Midwest
     
Dec 12, 2004 09:43 as a reply to  @ dobova's post |  #3

I am having great success but I did have to do the firmware update. Let me ask a stupid question, did you do the firmware update or confirm that the body already had it? I know it's silly but sometimes things like that can make a difference.


Thanks for stopping in and having a look.
Prints of my work are available for purchase. Please contact me offline or thru PM if you are interested.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Dec 12, 2004 10:17 |  #4

kndreyn wrote:
I bought a 1D MkII and the 580EX flash unit a couple of weeks ago. I'm having a little problem with exposures using the flash. Everything is coming out underexposed unless I press the FE L button. Pressing that fixes the exposure. So while experimenting with it, I bumped the flash up 1 full stop and that gave me a good exposure, but if I press the FE L button with the flash increased, the pictures are overexposed. I took the camera back to the shop where I bought it, and they were puzzled too. They said the latest firmware was supposed to have corrected these problems. Has anyone else been seeing this with your 1D MkII? BTW - it does the same thing with my 550 EX flash.

I just tried the same thing on mine and my results for the most part were opposite to yours. In other words, when using FEL, my images were underexposing compared to the normal flash. But neither your camera nor mine have anything wrong with them. When shooting in normal flash mode, ie ETTL-II mode, the flash exposure is computed by measuring the pre-flash output over the entire frame and then applying ETTL-II logic. Unlike ETTL, AF point is not really taken into account in ETTL-II mode.

However, when using FEL, it seems as if the pre-flash reading is taken only from the area within the spot metering circle of the frame. So, depending on the refectivity of the area used as the target for FEL, you may get the exposre just right, under or over.

As for the general consensus that flash expsure with ETTL-II on the 1DmkII always leads to underexposure, that was my initial assessment, too. However, after taking several test shots, I've come to the conclusion that ETTL-II is working as advertised. What I did to get around what seems like extreme underexposure when viewing the LCD display is the increase my LCD brightness to 4 (from the default 3). The histogram also seems to show that the exposure is not as far right as it could be but again, when I analyzed the image in PS, I found there there were very tiny hot spots that would have come out blown had I increase the the flash compensation.

But, of course, this is just my personal view. I, for one, like to have my flash pictures coming out as natural as possible to the setting I was shooting in.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scottbergerphoto
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,429 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
     
Dec 12, 2004 10:45 as a reply to  @ PacAce's post |  #5

There is an extensive discussion of underexposure in ETTLII in the EOS Flash Sticky. It seems to be Canon's way of preventing flash overexposure. If the underexposure is consistent, dial in what FEC works for you. In addition only by using Manual Metering Mode on the camera can you prevent the Automatic Reduction of Fill Flash programmed into the camera for all modes except M. I use Manual Metering on the 1D Mark II and ETTLII on the flash.

Scott


One World, One Voice Against Terror,
Best Regards,
Scott
ScottBergerPhotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kndreyn
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
160 posts
Joined Nov 2004
     
Dec 12, 2004 11:46 as a reply to  @ scottbergerphoto's post |  #6

The EOS Flash Sticky was the first place I went looking for information on this. It came up with a thread about projectors. I tried searching for answers but didn't really find anything there. It could be there were still glitches in the new software when I tried. I'll try again later. Sorry for being so hasty with my question.

scottbergerphoto wrote:
There is an extensive discussion of underexposure in ETTLII in the EOS Flash Sticky. It seems to be Canon's way of preventing flash overexposure. If the underexposure is consistent, dial in what FEC works for you. In addition only by using Manual Metering Mode on the camera can you prevent the Automatic Reduction of Fill Flash programmed into the camera for all modes except M. I use Manual Metering on the 1D Mark II and ETTLII on the flash.

Scott




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scottbergerphoto
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,429 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
     
Dec 12, 2004 15:41 as a reply to  @ kndreyn's post |  #7

I don't know why the two links aren't working right now but the bottom line is that all metering modes other then Manual (camera), cause the camera to use Automatic Reduction of Fill Flash when the flash is in ETTLII or ETTL. To get more consistent flash exposure, put the camera in M and the flash in ETTLII and use whatever FEC you need. In addition, some people get more consistent flash results switching the flash metering to averaging from evaluative in Cf.N 14.
Scott


One World, One Voice Against Terror,
Best Regards,
Scott
ScottBergerPhotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kndreyn
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
160 posts
Joined Nov 2004
     
Dec 12, 2004 19:24 as a reply to  @ scottbergerphoto's post |  #8

Hi Scott,

I tried that today and had much better success. I now have a full day's worth of shooting my granddaughter, and the pictures are incredible! I have so much to learn, and I know the answers are here somewhere. I just need to figure out how to find them. Thanks for the help.

Regards,
Keith

scottbergerphoto wrote:
In addition, some people get more consistent flash results switching the flash metering to averaging from evaluative in Cf.N 14.
Scott




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scottbergerphoto
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,429 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
     
Dec 13, 2004 06:21 as a reply to  @ kndreyn's post |  #9

;) Your welcome!
Regards,
Scott


One World, One Voice Against Terror,
Best Regards,
Scott
ScottBergerPhotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,091 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
EOS 1D Mark II exposure problem
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2176 guests, 129 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.