Hi all,
Just posting some photos....
Quality downgraded so that it wouldn't take an hour to upload!
More to come!
HuskiesD1 Senior Member 431 posts Joined Feb 2007 Location: Brooklyn Center, MN More info | May 11, 2008 21:43 | #1 Hi all, More to come!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 11, 2008 21:44 | #2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JoJo2fast Goldmember 1,759 posts Likes: 94 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Seattle, WA More info | May 11, 2008 22:58 | #3 Nice shots! Jordan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cargo123 Senior Member 742 posts Joined Mar 2005 Location: Denver, Colorado More info | May 12, 2008 07:05 | #4 You have some great shots. The last one looks like a poster made in photoshop. That must have been tuff shooting the sport at night.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TopGear1Ds Senior Member 600 posts Joined Nov 2007 Location: Silver Spring, MD, USA More info | May 12, 2008 10:05 | #5 I'm not sure if you're looking for critique, but I hope you don't mind if I add my .02 =) --Matt--
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 12, 2008 10:34 | #6 TopGear1Ds wrote in post #5508045 I'm not sure if you're looking for critique, but I hope you don't mind if I add my .02 =) Framing: There are a couple instances of chopped off body parts (ex. the helmet in #1 and foot in #3). If you were using the 300mm in your sig it might have been unavoidable, but I think if you shot portrait orientation instead of landscape, you'd get more keepers. I think portrait orientation really just works better for isolating individuals in sports. People are taller than they are wide, so landscape orientation can chop off a lot of a player's body, and add only empty space next to them. (Some of your shots really work well in landscape though, like #2 and #4) My only other gripe would be the somewhat inconsistent exposure, but it looks like you were shooting through sunset into dusk, so I bet that was pretty difficult to control. Focus and action look really good though. I hope you don't mind the critique on framing. I just think shooting more vertical orientation would really improve this set! Well aware of the framing, is kinda hard with a prime.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TopGear1Ds Senior Member 600 posts Joined Nov 2007 Location: Silver Spring, MD, USA More info | May 12, 2008 10:38 | #7 HuskiesD1 wrote in post #5508233 Well aware of the framing, is kinda hard with a prime. Thats what I'm saying though.. I think most of your framing problems aren't the primes fault, but rather that you're shooting a vertical subject with the camera horizontal. Put that extra shutter button on your MkII to good use --Matt--
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 12, 2008 10:39 | #8 TopGear1Ds wrote in post #5508258 Thats what I'm saying though.. I think most of your framing problems aren't the primes fault, but rather that you're shooting a vertical subject with the camera horizontal. Put that extra shutter button on your MkII to good use ![]() The only problem I have with that button is that its extra sensitive. WAY too sensitive, and I can't change that.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TopGear1Ds Senior Member 600 posts Joined Nov 2007 Location: Silver Spring, MD, USA More info | May 12, 2008 10:55 | #9 What a strange problem =/.. I guess it really was unavoidable then. --Matt--
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 12, 2008 11:12 | #10 TopGear1Ds wrote in post #5508356 What a strange problem =/.. I guess it really was unavoidable then. Have you thought about getting that serviced? I would go nuts if I couldn't shoot portrait orientation for sports (multiply that by a factor of 10 if it was a 1D series that wasn't working properly) It's working properly. I've heard other complaints that the button is too sensitive. Just have to learn to use a lighter touch
LOG IN TO REPLY |
antelope19 Member 32 posts Joined Feb 2008 Location: MD More info | I am going to a couple D1 college games this weekend in Annapolis(UVA-MD and Navy-Johns Hopkins) and am hoping to get some good shots. :fingers crossed: but yes, it can be a tough game to shoot if you can't see the play developing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ijohnson Goldmember 1,646 posts Joined Nov 2003 Location: Whiteriver, AZ More info | May 14, 2008 14:21 | #13 1 has a terrible head cropping. 3 has a head and foot cropping. The rule it to crop between joints (mid thigh, tummy, mid rib cage, maybe mid calf but that usually doesn't work). www.trickoflight.net
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 14, 2008 19:46 | #14 ijohnson wrote in post #5523940 1 has a terrible head cropping. 3 has a head and foot cropping. The rule it to crop between joints (mid thigh, tummy, mid rib cage, maybe mid calf but that usually doesn't work). Everything else looks good. Not so much cropping, but the way they were shot. Learning to use primes with field sports
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ijohnson Goldmember 1,646 posts Joined Nov 2003 Location: Whiteriver, AZ More info | May 14, 2008 19:58 | #15 HuskiesD1 wrote in post #5526004 Not so much cropping, but the way they were shot. Learning to use primes with field sports ![]() OK, framing then. My point is that the others look just fine but the awkward "framing" takes away from the images mentioned. www.trickoflight.net
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2707 guests, 171 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||