Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 12 May 2008 (Monday) 08:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

busy......slow flash?

 
tomdlgns
Senior Member
541 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
May 12, 2008 08:22 |  #1

i was in a low light scenario last night and it seemed that i could only take 1 or 2 pictures before my xti was displaying busy on the screen, i was using the flash.

i sometimes i had to wait 10-15 seconds for the busy light to go away. it was at a graduation ceremony, so everyone is in a hurry trying to take pictures and all that good stuff...

would an alternative flash help me in this situation? i realize it will kill my battery quicker than the on board flash, but this is something that needs to be addressed.

thanks


none

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shutterfiend
Goldmember
2,058 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: NJ
     
May 12, 2008 08:38 |  #2

Not sure if I understood this right. Were you using the pop-up flash?

External flashes have their own batteries. Some external flashes recycle faster than others. Recycle time for external flashes are usually faster than the pop-up. Recycle time depends on exposure.


https://photography-on-the.net …p=7812587&postc​ount=91776

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
May 12, 2008 08:39 |  #3

Hotshoe-mounted flash units use their own batteries (inexpensive AA), so using one will help your camera's battery last longer than if you were using the built-in.

There are many factors affecting recycle time, but most hotshoe flash units will recycle faster than the built-in unit, given the same output.

Here's six more reasons to get a good flash unit.


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tomdlgns
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
541 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
May 12, 2008 08:43 |  #4

i was using the pop up flash, correct.

also, i have the battery grip ordered, ordered it last week, so if i did get an extra flash, battery life wouldn't be that great of a concern. i just want to be able to take 3-5 pictures within 15-30 seconds. i hated waiting the additional 10-15 seconds between some of the pics for the flash to recycle. also, i don't want to carry a battery pack and a big flash either. just something that can fit on top of the camera is what i am hoping will help me out.


none

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tomdlgns
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
541 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
May 12, 2008 08:44 |  #5

shutterfiend wrote in post #5507549 (external link)
Not sure if I understood this right. Were you using the pop-up flash?

External flashes have their own batteries. Some external flashes recycle faster than others. Recycle time for external flashes are usually faster than the pop-up. Recycle time depends on exposure.


that explains why i had a shorter delay during some pictures and a longer delay during other pictures. i was going to ask that question, but now i see where you are getting at.

thanks


none

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elysium
"full of stupid banter"
Avatar
11,619 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Harrow/London/UK/GB/That Part Of The World/Next To France
     
May 12, 2008 08:45 |  #6

tomdlgns wrote in post #5507573 (external link)
i was using the pop up flash, correct.

also, i have the battery grip ordered, ordered it last week, so if i did get an extra flash, battery life wouldn't be that great of a concern. i just want to be able to take 3-5 pictures within 15-30 seconds. i hated waiting the additional 10-15 seconds between some of the pics for the flash to recycle. also, i don't want to carry a battery pack and a big flash either. just something that can fit on top of the camera is what i am hoping will help me out.

Thats normal. Using a battery grip will not help much. It comes up busy not just for recycling but to stop the flash from burning out.


Everyday, a programmer finds a way of creating an idiotproof program. Everyday, the universe spits out another idiot.....So far, the universe if winning

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tomdlgns
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
541 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
May 12, 2008 08:47 |  #7

elysium wrote in post #5507585 (external link)
Thats normal. Using a battery grip will not help much. It comes up busy not just for recycling but to stop the flash from burning out.

sure, that is a good point.

but what i meant about the battery grip..if the flash also drains the battery a little more, i will be able to squeeze in mroe shots if i have the battery grip, correct?

i realize this will not help the recycle time, i just figured i would be able to get more shots in before i had to replace the batteries.

thanks.


none

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elysium
"full of stupid banter"
Avatar
11,619 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Harrow/London/UK/GB/That Part Of The World/Next To France
     
May 12, 2008 08:50 |  #8

tomdlgns wrote in post #5507596 (external link)
sure, that is a good point.

but what i meant about the battery grip..if the flash also drains the battery a little more, i will be able to squeeze in mroe shots if i have the battery grip, correct?

i realize this will not help the recycle time, i just figured i would be able to get more shots in before i had to replace the batteries.

thanks.

Maybe be able to squeeze more shots out of it with extra mattery but in all honesty, you sound like you need faster recycle times and adequate light. Thought about a 580EX?


Everyday, a programmer finds a way of creating an idiotproof program. Everyday, the universe spits out another idiot.....So far, the universe if winning

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shutterfiend
Goldmember
2,058 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: NJ
     
May 12, 2008 08:52 |  #9

External flashes may take anywhere between 0.1 sec to 6 sec or more to recycle. Before you make a purchase it might be a good idea to read some of the material on this forum. Just follow the link CurtisN provided, it offers great in depth understanding about lighting. "Master Flasher" is not a tittle to be taken lightly. He does flash a lot ;)


https://photography-on-the.net …p=7812587&postc​ount=91776

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tomdlgns
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
541 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
May 12, 2008 08:53 |  #10

elysium wrote in post #5507606 (external link)
Maybe be able to squeeze more shots out of it with extra mattery but in all honesty, you sound like you need faster recycle times and adequate light. Thought about a 580EX?


what is mattery?

yes, a 580EX was something i was looking at, however, i didnt want to buy if if the recycle times are not greater.

back to the battery issue.

if i have a 580ex with my standard canon battery, lets say i get 1000 shots, assuming i use the flash on all the shots.

wouldnt i get 2000 pictures with the battery grip while using the 580ex flash?

those are not exact numbers, obviously, that is how i thought it worked.

thanks.


none

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tomdlgns
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
541 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
May 12, 2008 08:57 |  #11

shutterfiend wrote in post #5507625 (external link)
External flashes may take anywhere between 0.1 sec to 6 sec or more to recycle. Before you make a purchase it might be a good idea to read some of the material on this forum. Just follow the link CurtisN provided, it offers great in depth understanding about lighting. "Master Flasher" is not a tittle to be taken lightly. He does flash a lot ;)

yes, i would like more information, that is why i didn't just run out and buy a flash without getting more information.

another thing i want to point out...there is only so much i can do for lighting in this particular situation, a hectic/crowded auditorium hall. since i don't have much control over the lighting, maybe a point and shoot has a better built in flash?

i saw many people taking pic after pic after pic with their tiny point and shoot, while i had to wait 10 seconds for a recycle, at times.

good advice so far, thanks guy.


none

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elysium
"full of stupid banter"
Avatar
11,619 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Harrow/London/UK/GB/That Part Of The World/Next To France
     
May 12, 2008 08:59 |  #12

tomdlgns wrote in post #5507629 (external link)
what is mattery?

yes, a 580EX was something i was looking at, however, i didnt want to buy if if the recycle times are not greater.

back to the battery issue.

if i have a 580ex with my standard canon battery, lets say i get 1000 shots, assuming i use the flash on all the shots.

wouldnt i get 2000 pictures with the battery grip while using the 580ex flash?

those are not exact numbers, obviously, that is how i thought it worked.

thanks.

I meant battery sorry lol. You could get more or less depending on the power required for the shots. You just have far more control over light used.

Like mentioned already, recycle times are faster.


Everyday, a programmer finds a way of creating an idiotproof program. Everyday, the universe spits out another idiot.....So far, the universe if winning

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tomdlgns
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
541 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
May 12, 2008 09:00 |  #13

elysium wrote in post #5507664 (external link)
I meant battery sorry lol. You could get more or less depending on the power required for the shots. You just have far more control over light used.

Like mentioned already, recycle times are faster.

ok, thanks.

:)


none

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
May 12, 2008 09:02 |  #14

Get a used 580EX or 550EX and a Canon CP-E3 or CP-E4 battery pack. It'll recharge near enough to instantly, so long as you use ISO400 to 800 - and there's no good reason not to. A full charge is 2-3 seconds, but lots of full power flashes and you'll burn out the flash head. The 430EX would be a good cheaper solution, it doesn't take a battery pack but it'll still recharge a lot quicker than your built in camera flash.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shutterfiend
Goldmember
2,058 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: NJ
     
May 12, 2008 09:04 |  #15

tomdlgns wrote in post #5507651 (external link)
yes, i would like more information, that is why i didn't just run out and buy a flash without getting more information.

another thing i want to point out...there is only so much i can do for lighting in this particular situation, a hectic/crowded auditorium hall. since i don't have much control over the lighting, maybe a point and shoot has a better built in flash?

i saw many people taking pic after pic after pic with their tiny point and shoot, while i had to wait 10 seconds for a recycle, at times.

good advice so far, thanks guy.

This is probably not true. However, your camera might allow you to use settings that require greater flash output and hence longer recycle times. Ordinary point and shoots might limit flash output for better recycle time.


https://photography-on-the.net …p=7812587&postc​ount=91776

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,365 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
busy......slow flash?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2591 guests, 167 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.