^Awesome
izthistaken Cream of the Crop 6,857 posts Likes: 14 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Warren, MI More info | Jul 18, 2011 14:20 | #2836 ^Awesome Matt
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vipergts831 Has the TF retired? Or just being utterly lazy? 44,159 posts Gallery: 42 photos Likes: 561 Joined Apr 2009 Location: Taking better shots with an iPhone than MDJAK with a 1DX More info | Jul 18, 2011 14:28 | #2837 |
Mannytkd Goldmember 1,224 posts Joined Feb 2005 Location: Bradford West Yorkshire More info | Jul 19, 2011 10:01 | #2838 Standing Stones on Scales Moor, the Yorkshire Dales. Canon 50D | [COLOR=black]18-55 IS | 55-250 IS | Canon EF 100mm USM macro | Canon 50mm MK2 | Tokina 11-16 | Kenko Auto Extension Tubes | Uniloc 1200 series pod | Canon 430EX flash gun | Some filters
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vipergts831 Has the TF retired? Or just being utterly lazy? 44,159 posts Gallery: 42 photos Likes: 561 Joined Apr 2009 Location: Taking better shots with an iPhone than MDJAK with a 1DX More info | Jul 20, 2011 09:07 | #2839 |
Mannytkd Goldmember 1,224 posts Joined Feb 2005 Location: Bradford West Yorkshire More info | Jul 20, 2011 10:43 | #2840 vipergts831 wrote in post #12791498 Time Warner Center and Trump Tower. IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE] This is excelent and the mono conversion is spot on in terms of tones. Canon 50D | [COLOR=black]18-55 IS | 55-250 IS | Canon EF 100mm USM macro | Canon 50mm MK2 | Tokina 11-16 | Kenko Auto Extension Tubes | Uniloc 1200 series pod | Canon 430EX flash gun | Some filters
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vipergts831 Has the TF retired? Or just being utterly lazy? 44,159 posts Gallery: 42 photos Likes: 561 Joined Apr 2009 Location: Taking better shots with an iPhone than MDJAK with a 1DX More info | Jul 20, 2011 10:46 | #2841 Mannytkd wrote in post #12791976 This is excelent and the mono conversion is spot on in terms of tones. Thanks Manny! Tough to get that shot off with all the people coming in and out of the train station. -Omar- Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TimUhler Member 37 posts Joined Dec 2008 More info | My only subject 40D; Sigma 30mm 1.4; Sigma 70-200 2.8 II;Tokina 11-16 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ions Goldmember 1,825 posts Likes: 18 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Burlington, ON, Canada More info | Jul 21, 2011 20:07 | #2843 Tim Uhler wrote in post #12801397 My only subject ![]() Shot at 3.2 aperature priority and then split toned in LR3 Image That's sweet, and a very cute shot. Gear: Canon EOS 5D3 | Canon EOS 7D | Canon 24-70L ƒ2.8 | Canon 100L ƒ2.8 | Canon 70-200 ƒ2.8L IS II | Canon 420 EX | Tamrac Evolution 9 | Crumpler 8 MDH | Manfrotto 190QC with 804RC2 head.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
C.Michael Senior Member 754 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jul 2010 Location: Adelaide, South Australia More info | Jul 23, 2011 03:37 | #2844 Is there really a need for 2.8 on a lens like this which, lets be honest, is a 95% landscape lens. So most of the time it will be stopped down to anywhere between f/8 - f/13? www.christophermorrison.com.au
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 23, 2011 04:23 | #2845 C.Michael wrote in post #12808252 Is there really a need for 2.8 on a lens like this which, lets be honest, is a 95% landscape lens. Really? 95%? Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ride5000 Goldmember 1,422 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jan 2008 More info | Jul 23, 2011 06:35 | #2846 C.Michael wrote in post #12808252 Is there really a need for 2.8 on a lens like this which, lets be honest, is a 95% landscape lens. So most of the time it will be stopped down to anywhere between f/8 - f/13? my most interesting shots on flickr with this lens flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vipergts831 Has the TF retired? Or just being utterly lazy? 44,159 posts Gallery: 42 photos Likes: 561 Joined Apr 2009 Location: Taking better shots with an iPhone than MDJAK with a 1DX More info | Jul 23, 2011 09:02 | #2847 hollis_f wrote in post #12808328 Really? 95%? How about all the people who have bought it for use indoors where flash is not permitted - churches, museums, etc. It's used for that purpose by 87.2659722% of people (hey, if you're going to invent a statistic you may as well invent an unbelievable precise one). This.Your only limited by your creativity. -Omar- Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lazer-jock Don't mess 1,557 posts Joined Jan 2009 Location: Lincoln, Nebraska More info | Jul 23, 2011 09:30 | #2848 C.Michael wrote in post #12808252 Is there really a need for 2.8 on a lens like this which, lets be honest, is a 95% landscape lens. So most of the time it will be stopped down to anywhere between f/8 - f/13? Astrophotography also benefits... I'm off lining my cage with newspaper.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ions Goldmember 1,825 posts Likes: 18 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Burlington, ON, Canada More info | Jul 27, 2011 12:56 | #2849 4 days since the last post in here!? For shame! Sunwapta Falls, Jasper National Park, Alberta, Canada Gear: Canon EOS 5D3 | Canon EOS 7D | Canon 24-70L ƒ2.8 | Canon 100L ƒ2.8 | Canon 70-200 ƒ2.8L IS II | Canon 420 EX | Tamrac Evolution 9 | Crumpler 8 MDH | Manfrotto 190QC with 804RC2 head.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gatorlink Senior Member 901 posts Likes: 12 Joined Mar 2011 Location: Southern California More info | Jul 27, 2011 22:22 | #2850 |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1903 guests, 103 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||