A slightly off topic, but for those of you who own one, what's the external battery pack that you'd recommend?
Canon if specifically for the 580EX.
Quantum for all other flashes.
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | May 13, 2008 12:37 | #16 SYS wrote in post #5516139 A slightly off topic, but for those of you who own one, what's the external battery pack that you'd recommend? Canon if specifically for the 580EX. You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 13, 2008 12:42 | #17 If I want to use the external batter pack for 580EX as well as for something else, let's say a strobe, then would Quantum work? I'd also guess that it's cheaper to get a non-Canon brand...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | May 13, 2008 12:48 | #18 I do not own 580EX, so have no direct knowledge of suitability of Quantum for 580EX. You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 13, 2008 13:01 | #19 Wilt wrote in post #5516248 I do not own 580EX, so have no direct knowledge of suitability of Quantum for 580EX. I can tell you that I have used Quantum batteries on three different brands/models of flash units, and the Quantums are quite long lived! Thanks, Wilt. I'll look into Quantum.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PacAce Cream of the Crop 26,900 posts Likes: 40 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Keystone State, USA More info | May 13, 2008 14:21 | #20 SYS wrote in post #5516202 If I want to use the external batter pack for 580EX as well as for something else, let's say a strobe, then would Quantum work? I'd also guess that it's cheaper to get a non-Canon brand... In this case, the Canon brand would be cheaper except that you'd have to provide your own AA x 8 batteries. ...Leo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | May 13, 2008 14:37 | #21 PacAce wrote in post #5516896 In this case, the Canon brand would be cheaper except that you'd have to provide your own AA x 8 batteries. With the Quantum, you can get different cords to connect to different brand flashes and maybe a few lower power strobes. And with the Canon, you most likely will need to swap batteries during a wedding, while the higher capacity Quantum would 'keep on ticking' like the Everready battery bunny commercial. You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SolidxSnake Goldmember 1,656 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2007 More info | May 13, 2008 17:44 | #22 Wilt wrote in post #5517018 And with the Canon, you most likely will need to swap batteries during a wedding, while the higher capacity Quantum would 'keep on ticking' like the Everready battery bunny commercial.
Troubleshooting 101 (see also: LightRules,perryge):
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | May 13, 2008 17:58 | #23 SolidxSnake wrote in post #5518188 Just goes to show how well Energizer's advertisement and marketing is working ![]() I think some here are getting confused... he said manual which means full power to some, or manual which means user-adjustable length of the flash burst to others. Keep that in mind until clarified. To address that point let's make this blatantly clear, so that it is impossible to misinterpret the facts...
You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SolidxSnake Goldmember 1,656 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2007 More info | May 13, 2008 18:30 | #24 Wilt wrote in post #5518273 To address that point let's make this blatantly clear, so that it is impossible to misinterpret the facts...
Troubleshooting 101 (see also: LightRules,perryge):
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | SYS wrote in post #5516139 A slightly off topic, but for those of you who own one, what's the external battery pack that you'd recommend? Wilt wrote in post #5517018 And with the Canon, you most likely will need to swap batteries during a wedding, while the higher capacity Quantum would 'keep on ticking' like the Everready battery bunny commercial. Canon CP-E4 Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | May 14, 2008 09:13 | #26 tim wrote in post #5520945 Canon CP-E4 Certainly all true statements. OTOH, I rather doubt that any AA batteries would still be usable a decade and a half later from the date they were put into service, so there are the multiple replacement sets of AA to keep in mind in the expense equation. You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PacAce Cream of the Crop 26,900 posts Likes: 40 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Keystone State, USA More info | May 14, 2008 10:22 | #27 Wilt wrote in post #5522065 Certainly all true statements. OTOH, I rather doubt that any AA batteries would still be usable a decade and a half later from the date they were put into service, so there are the multiple replacement sets of AA to keep in mind in the expense equation. Then there is also the unknown of how long that battery pack from Canon remains usable with future Canon flash, whereas the long term applicability of Quantum is well established across many flashes. Wouldn't the question of the longetivity of a battery apply to any battery whether it's in a Canon powerpack, Quantum's, or anybody else's? ...Leo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | May 14, 2008 10:34 | #28 PacAce wrote in post #5522437 Wouldn't the question of the longetivity of a battery apply to any battery whether it's in a Canon powerpack, Quantum's, or anybody else's? ![]() Yes. But I can state that I have two Quantum packs with the original battery set in them, 1.5 decades later. OTOH, I have thrown out multiple sets of AA NiMH batteries because of cells that the conditioning charger indicate are malfunctioning, and the sets were all put into use within the past five years. You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
martinsmith Senior Member 680 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: S Glos, UK More info | May 14, 2008 12:21 | #29 PacAce> I only use Fujicell 2700 rechargables in my flash. It seems to be ready to fire again as quickly as I can press the button. It recycles quicker than my pal's SB800 with Duracells'. [SIZE=1]ms-imaging
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | May 14, 2008 12:44 | #30 martinsmith wrote in post #5523114 Wilt> We were taking about 10-20 shots at a time with minimal pauses not 300 continuous. There were breaks for the model to change, move lights, move props, etc. Oh and thanks for changing my name. Very funny? 'martinsmite' You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2768 guests, 173 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||