I need a cheap flash since im low on money right now. i was thinking about the sunpak 383. but can that fit on the camera or must that be off the camera?
thekid17 Senior Member 984 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2007 More info | May 13, 2008 18:13 | #1 I need a cheap flash since im low on money right now. i was thinking about the sunpak 383. but can that fit on the camera or must that be off the camera?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TyG Member 137 posts Joined Mar 2008 More info | May 13, 2008 23:18 | #2 It can fit on the camera; but in all honesty, you will be disappointed. It does not have ETTL, so you will have to guess at a few shots to get exposure or get a flash meter. If you get a flash meter and a $80 sunpak 383, you will end up coming close to the price of the 430 canon flash with ETTL. I've gone the sunpak route with cactus triggers; and it is OK if you are shooting portraits where someone is sitting still in the same light for all the shots. But if you want to shoot in room for a birthday party or a wedding with changing light everywhere you aim, the sunpak will only dissappoint you and will have you chasing answers.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cito17 Senior Member 724 posts Likes: 21 Joined Feb 2008 Location: SF Bay Area More info | Look into a Sigma EF-500 DG Super, Sigma EF-530 DG ST or Super, used 380EX, 420EX, or 550EX. All of those are ETTL. -Adrian [ Flickr ]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ninext Member 142 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: so. cal. More info | May 14, 2008 06:39 | #4 Ty G wrote in post #5520079 It can fit on the camera; but in all honesty, you will be disappointed. It does not have ETTL, so you will have to guess at a few shots to get exposure or get a flash meter. If you get a flash meter and a $80 sunpak 383, you will end up coming close to the price of the 430 canon flash with ETTL. I've gone the sunpak route with cactus triggers; and it is OK if you are shooting portraits where someone is sitting still in the same light for all the shots. But if you want to shoot in room for a birthday party or a wedding with changing light everywhere you aim, the sunpak will only dissappoint you and will have you chasing answers. if you have a basic understanding of how flash exposure works the sunpak 383 will be more than worth the $80.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JimM Goldmember 1,656 posts Likes: 39 Joined Aug 2006 More info | May 14, 2008 12:26 | #5 I think the 383 does have an automatic feature. It just does it the old fashioned way, namely with a sensor on the flash itself rather than using the camera for through-the-lens flash sensing. You won't have to use manual flash for everything, but the camera and the flash won't talk to each other about the exposure. It's all on what the flash sees. I (and many, many others) used this style of flash for years and years. It will work very well in most situations and you only have to do a little bit of thinking.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
i read a review saying the built in flash on a xt is stronger than the 220
LOG IN TO REPLY |
im stuck between the sunpak 383 or the vivitar 285 hv
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 14, 2008 19:33 | #9 THIS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnT Member 128 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: Cardiff, UK. More info | The Sunpak PF30X is a good basic flash with E-TTLII.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 15, 2008 12:50 | #11 a521 wrote in post #5525917 THIS There are times when you won't have time to think about every shot and just want the camera to do the thinking for you, this flash will do well in those situations. If I remeber right, you can always adjust FEC in camera to add or decrease light with these flashes. Not a bad alternative for around $75. But...be very gentle with it, mine has electrical tape holding the red lens cover on the and the battery door shut from dropping it once. My Sigma has fallen off my camera twice and had no effect on it.. If I were you, I would go with the Sunpak 383 and force yourself to learn as much as you can quickly. At some point you will want to expand your capabilties and adding another 383 with wireless triggers can give you a portable 2 light setup for another $120. Good luck! hey thanks im think im gonna with the sunpak. im gonna order it when i get out school
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 15, 2008 16:47 | #12 It is really worth it to get the 430 EX. I would wait until I had enogh to but one.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
supergoat Member 181 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Columbia, SC More info | May 15, 2008 17:56 | #13 I have a Bower SFD728C and it is TTL dedicated. Works great for most applications but now that I have practice with it I want to upgrade to a speedlight. The manual zoom on the Bower is a bit cheap feeling and annoying when you forget to match the zoom to the lens zoom. However if you set it to 50mm and toss on the nifty fifty at 2.8 you can get some fantastic, sharp shots in low light. It's a fantastic starter lens to get your feet wet with flash until you can afford one of the big boys. Canon 50D | 430exII Speedlite
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2625 guests, 173 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||