Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 13 May 2008 (Tuesday) 19:28
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How many of you use the 10-22 in the 16-22 range as walkaround?

 
Lidor7
Member
203 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
     
May 13, 2008 19:28 |  #1

As the thread title says, how many of you own a 10-22 and use it as a walk-around lens in the 16-22 range often?

What I'm getting at is: I've had my heart set on a 10-22 for a while now, but now with the Tokina 11-16 f/2.8, I'm considering getting the Tokina instead.

I'm a fan of wide angle, but I'm afraid the 11-16 range might be too wide for most normal uses. I'm not one to change lens often. The 10-22 has a decent zoom range and at 22mm on a crop, that's only mildly WA, so I can use it for crazy WA or fairly normal shots. But I don't want to buy the 10-22 and just realize that I never bother shooting longer than 16mm anyways.

Also, how well does the 10-22 perform indoors? It has no IS or wide aperture, but maybe the short focal range lets it get by with longer shutter speeds. What are your guys' thoughts on this?

Tell me what you guys use your 10-22 most often for (outdoors and landscape obviously, but what about people, indoors, other creative uses) and in what focal range.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon ­ Soldier
..."kind of like Zooms"?
803 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Arrested with no pants in the nuthouse
     
May 13, 2008 19:33 |  #2

portraits...nah. Wide angle+portrait=distort​ion. Indoor...meh...if you can swing it. If i were you, i would get one, try one out and see where you like it best, and if it doesn't suit your needs return it and get the other.


Na, just kidding, you are still a loser.
^^ If you higlight this you will be cool ^^

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cam101
Senior Member
615 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
     
May 13, 2008 19:39 |  #3

Ive had my 10-22 for a while now and it's main function for me is landscapes for sure. It's also fun to get creative and play with the distortion a bit, but i've noticed that for people I will usually switch out to another lens to be safe.

I find it a little slow for indoor shots, but take that with a grain of salt since i'm just beginning to learn how to use a flash properly.

It is a great lens for what it does, but I would say it's really designed for one thing... UWA outdoors.


Canon R5
Canon Lenses: RF 70-200 f/2.8L | EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro | MP-E 65mm Macro
RRS TVC-34L MkII | RRS BH55 and Anvil-30

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tsmith
Formerly known as Bluedog_XT
Avatar
10,429 posts
Likes: 26
Joined Jul 2005
Location: South_the 601
     
May 13, 2008 19:54 |  #4

Although I love this lens it doesn't serve me as a walk around type. The 17-40 does that.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DDan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,725 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Oceanside, Calif.
     
May 13, 2008 19:57 as a reply to  @ Cam101's post |  #5

I am a motorsports kind of guy and I use all of my 10-22s focal range. It is nice in the garage or the pit. I don't usually take shots of people but I think it could be used carefully for that.


My Gear
DansRacePhotos.com (external link)

Dangerous Dan

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kahren
Senior Member
505 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2005
Location: CT
     
May 13, 2008 20:32 |  #6

acquired a 10-22 for my wide angle stuff, tried some indoors, then a little as walk around, it was good at wide scenery, but was too slow for my liking at the long end as a walk around, and indoors i didnt like it at all was way too slow and it seemed that the corners were too dark so they were noisy at high iso.

conclusion, i dont shoot scenery often engouh to justify the 10-22 and i coudlnt use it for anything else i shoot, so i got rid of it. what was left to be desired was a f2.8 with the same range. without going 5d and 17-40 or 16-35 there was pretty much no option. untill now this tokina might be that lens, except it only goes to 16mm which is pretty wide fo ra walkaround. i do very much prefer the 20mm focal length and i think that is the lens that is on my 400d most of the time, so i dont know how the 16mm would be.

my .02 cents for what its worth



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AiGTs
Senior Member
535 posts
Joined Oct 2006
     
May 13, 2008 20:44 as a reply to  @ kahren's post |  #7

I don't think I can live without the 16-22 range. It'll be very limiting if I couldn't use the long end of this lens.


20D 24 2.8 85 1.8
M8 35Lux 50Lux 50Nok

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roy ­ Webber
Goldmember
3,187 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Corralejo, Fuerteventura....Canary Islands Spain
     
May 13, 2008 22:50 |  #8

I use my 10-22 almost exclusively for work...superb lens!


Canon 7D, 40D,100-400 IS L, EFS 15-85 IS, EFS 10-22-With Faulty USM, 055XPROB+488RC2, 430 & 580 II Flash, Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8-:cool:
Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,346 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
How many of you use the 10-22 in the 16-22 range as walkaround?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is SteveeY
1763 guests, 177 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.