I'm not sure if this is already posted but
vewy intewesting...hhmmmm.
Noink In-viewfinder display.![]()
glowie Senior Member 888 posts Joined Feb 2006 Location: NYC More info | May 16, 2008 17:38 | #1 I'm not sure if this is already posted but .....::....:..:..:::.::....:::..::....:.:.:::....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hermeto Cream of the Crop 6,674 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | May 16, 2008 19:03 | #2 Permanent banComplicated electronic substitute for the simple technique of shooting with both eyes opened. What we see depends mainly on what we look for.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JeffreyG "my bits and pieces are all hard" More info | May 16, 2008 21:20 | #3 You can patent things that do not work or have no commercial value. Having a patent by itself does not mean much. My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/photos/jngirbach/sets/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 16, 2008 21:22 | #4 Hermeto wrote in post #5539567 Complicated electronic substitute for the simple technique of shooting with both eyes opened.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hermeto Cream of the Crop 6,674 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | May 16, 2008 23:02 | #5 Permanent banFZ1dave wrote in post #5540227 ![]() Right, and if it was Canons' idea you'd be saying how great it is. I love how easy the Nikon bashing flows around here. Just out of curiousity, how do you know what I would be saying if that was Canon’s idea? What we see depends mainly on what we look for.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 16, 2008 23:24 | #6 Hermeto wrote in post #5540691 Did I make any particular refference to either Nikon or Canon in my post? You didn't have to. The dismissive response said enough.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
asysin2leads I'm kissing arse 6,329 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Lebanon, OH More info | Uh, someone pass the popcorn. I'm sticking around for this one. Kevin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hermeto Cream of the Crop 6,674 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | May 17, 2008 00:02 | #8 Permanent banFZ1dave wrote in post #5540805 You didn't have to. The dismissive response said enough. Wow, I am impressed! What we see depends mainly on what we look for.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nicksan Man I Like to Fart 24,738 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2006 Location: NYC More info | May 17, 2008 00:05 | #9 And it's not even pay per view! asysin2leads wrote in post #5540828 Uh, someone pass the popcorn. I'm sticking around for this one.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
asysin2leads I'm kissing arse 6,329 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Lebanon, OH More info | May 17, 2008 01:11 | #10 I know. Ain't it great! Kevin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RedDot Senior Member 627 posts Joined Feb 2008 Location: Trapped Inside the Penta-prism More info | May 17, 2008 01:14 | #11 FZ1dave wrote in post #5540227 ![]() Right, and if it was Canons' idea you'd be saying how great it is. I love how easy the Nikon bashing flows around here. ok, one thing we all can agree is that canon's Print button SUCKS!!! I tried to write my signature, but my pen ran out and I put a big scratch on my monitor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 17, 2008 01:27 | #12 Sheesh... apparently there's some thin skin around here. Red Dot wrote in post #5541229 ok, one thing we all can agree is that canon's Print button SUCKS!!! Yes... yes it does.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PerryGe Batteries? We don't need no... . . . or cards. More info | May 17, 2008 03:55 | #13 At least on the G9 it's programmable! Come on Canon! Get your act together. Perry | www.perryge.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
elysium "full of stupid banter" 11,619 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Harrow/London/UK/GB/That Part Of The World/Next To France More info | May 17, 2008 04:14 | #14 asysin2leads wrote in post #5541221 I know. Ain't it great! Blink and its all over. Someone got PWNED. Everyday, a programmer finds a way of creating an idiotproof program. Everyday, the universe spits out another idiot.....So far, the universe if winning
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mike ugly when I'm sober More info | May 17, 2008 05:29 | #15 Hermeto wrote in post #5539567 Complicated electronic substitute for the simple technique of shooting with both eyes opened. Agreed. Shooting with 2 eyes open is something I quite often do - especially with sports. FZ1dave wrote in post #5540227 ![]() Right, and if it was Canons' idea you'd be saying how great it is. I love how easy the Nikon bashing flows around here. Not really. It's an interesting idea but one that I wouldn't really need, especially if it adds £££ to the price. www.mikegreenphotography.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2787 guests, 161 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||