Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 18 May 2008 (Sunday) 22:30
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

New to Weddings can I get by with the following equipment?

 
randydannheim
Member
34 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: I am a native of Phoenix, Arizona. In the good old USA
     
May 18, 2008 22:30 |  #1

Most of my experiance is in Landscapes, however, I have dabbled in all areas of photography. I am fairly new to the digital word. I want to start shooting more engagements, weddings.... to offset the cost of equipment.

My gear is as follows: Canon 40D w/ Rebel Xti for a backup. Lens include: Canon EFS 10-22, Tamron 28-75 f =2.8, EF50 f=1.8 II, EF 28-135 IS USM, EF 70-200L F/4 USM w/EF 1.4 tele converter. Lighting: 420EX and 580EX II. Support: Manfrotto 3001, 3221, and mono pod w/486 ball head.

Do you think I can do a reasonable job - get by - with the above equipment, or is it a must to add fast L glass to my lens inventory?


Randy D Dannheim:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Toogy
"I like pictures of myself!"
Avatar
6,248 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
     
May 18, 2008 22:33 |  #2

Simple answer, yes you can.

The only thing I'd suggest is the 70-200 F2.8 IS.

I think you will find the F4L too slow indoors, especially inside dark churches. But everything else you have is pretty decent.



Good Light and Shoot to the Right....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
randydannheim
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
34 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: I am a native of Phoenix, Arizona. In the good old USA
     
May 18, 2008 23:39 |  #3

Thanks Toogy, are there any other lens, i.e. Tamron, Sigma... that are near the quality of the L glass for less $ that anyone has used with good results? I just bought the 40D and $1600 is a little much + I have shot with this lens and it ways a ton.


Randy D Dannheim:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
randydannheim
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
34 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: I am a native of Phoenix, Arizona. In the good old USA
     
May 18, 2008 23:54 |  #4

This may sound silly, but how do I post my photo in my membership profile. Also how do I post images in my comments?


Randy D Dannheim:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
paul33
Senior Member
Avatar
380 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2002
Location: Peterborough, UK
     
May 19, 2008 01:45 |  #5

randydannheim wrote in post #5551289 (external link)
Do you think I can do a reasonable job - get by - with the above equipment, or is it a must to add fast L glass to my lens inventory?

My only concern would be that somebody who looks to shoot weddings on a "reasonable - get by" basis will not last long.

It is important to respect the occasion you are shooting and if you do, "get by" will not cut it.

Landscapes are there for you to have another go tomorrow but the wedding is a one off, you get no second chances.

Suggest the question should be "Do I have sufficient gear to shoot a wedding to a high standard" ...... and I don't know the answer to that one !


Nene Digital Wedding Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tobiah
Goldmember
Avatar
1,514 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Sale , Manchester ,UK
     
May 19, 2008 02:16 |  #6

yes you do. people shoot well with such gear as you.
you will need a faster zoom though... sell the f4 and get the 2.8 at least and best is the IS version


[URL="http://[URL]www.​tobiahtayo.com/"][SIZE​=2][COLOR=darkorange] [Blog] Various canon gear....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cisobe
Senior Member
257 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2007
     
May 19, 2008 04:23 |  #7

I agree with paul, you have to respect the event you're shooting... To almost every bride and their family, this is the single most important day of their lives... There will be a lot of pressure to perform, and capture the moments (no second chances for the kiss, the bouquet toss, etc.).

I shot my first wedding as the prime photographer, luckily for me, it was a small wedding for a friend who didn't intend on having a photographer in the first place. She said no pressure and that she didn't expect much, but it didn't mean there wasn't pressure to perform.

anyways, to answer your question, with the gear you have, you can shoot a wedding. however as mentioned in the previous post, you may want to step up to a 70-200 2.8 or you'll have to bump up your iso to compensate or use flash.

I shot my first wedding with my 40d, 70-200 2.8 IS, 10-22mm and 580EX with a friend as a second shooter using my XT with 28-135 IS and 70-300mm IS no flash. So I think you should do just fine. Just plan your shots out (make a list of must have shots), take a lot of extra batteries and CF cards, shoot raw if possible, it saved my butt several times, and practice practice practice!

have fun too!


5D MKIII|7D w/ Grip|EF-S 10-22MM f/3.5-4.5|EF-S 17-55MM f/2.8 IS|EF 24-105MM f/4L IS|EF 50MM f/1.4|EF 70-200MM f/2.8L IS|85mm f/1.8|35mm f/2 IS|70-300MM f/4-5.6 IS|580EX|Manfrotto 055PROB|2x PCB Einstein 640

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tobiah
Goldmember
Avatar
1,514 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Sale , Manchester ,UK
     
May 19, 2008 04:45 |  #8

even iso 3200 with f4 wont be enoug in some places...


[URL="http://[URL]www.​tobiahtayo.com/"][SIZE​=2][COLOR=darkorange] [Blog] Various canon gear....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
a_kraker99
Senior Member
287 posts
Joined Apr 2008
     
May 19, 2008 08:33 |  #9

The tamron lens you have has been compared to L series quality glass. Just the build isnt quite as good.


Andrew Kraker
Marc Photography (external link)
Portfolio Site (external link)
Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slava-slavik
Member
Avatar
241 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI, USA
     
May 19, 2008 12:22 |  #10

Your gear is fine. I know photographers getting some good stuff at weddings with less than you already have.

The next questions you might ask are: am I able to work under presure, do I know basics of portrait posing, can I get and hold attention of 20+ people,...


Slava Slavik, wedding and portrait photographer
Honolulu, HI
Slava Slavik Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike
ugly when I'm sober
Avatar
15,398 posts
Gallery: 51 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 393
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Canterbury/Ramsgate, UK
     
May 19, 2008 12:48 |  #11

randydannheim wrote in post #5551668 (external link)
Also how do I post images in my comments?

For image posting, see here: Image Posting Rules

Also, I would advise getting an account with Imageshack (external link) or someone similar. They make posting images very easy indeed.

As to your original question, yes, you have more than enough decent kit for shooting weddings. Make sure you have loads of spare batteries and at least 12 gig of memory too. I don't bother with tripods but you mmay chooose to do so and for my last wedding I didn't go above 70mm! The tele-con you prob won't need and you may like to up your 50mm 1.8 to a 1.4 or look at the Sigma 30mm f1.4 which is superb.

Make sure you are totally familiar with your kit and don't be afraid to use the high iso range to get the shutter speed you need.


And don't forget to enjoy yourself, otherwise there's no point! ;) :D

(and welcome to POTN)


www.mikegreenphotograp​hy.co.uk (external link)
Gear
UK South Easterners
flickr (external link) Insta1 (external link) Insta2 (external link)

A closed mouth gathers no foot.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
randydannheim
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
34 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: I am a native of Phoenix, Arizona. In the good old USA
     
May 19, 2008 13:45 |  #12

First of all thanks for all the helpful suggestions. 2nd, I never pose as a proffessional photographer nor do I charge like one. I am involved in a recovery ministry at church and often do events for free or a very nominal charge ($300-500). I have gained some good experiance doing this and I do have very good instincts and timing. I have never had anyone look at my images and complain. The worst thing that has happened so far is I have had to shoot ISO 1600 more than I would have liked. I also always shoot Raw + jpeg when I do these events. I give a set of 4x6s to the customer as part of the deal and offer them up to a dozen 8X12s or smaller from these, worked up in PS3 for printing. I also give the customer a sm file CD so they can print all the 4x6's they want. There has been a few times when shooting in RAW saved my bacon, however, expectations haven't been exstreamly high from the customers because there has been no contract and little if anything in the way of charges. I maily have been covering cost.

So far results have been pretty good. I would like to start learning more about the business end of wedding photography and find a mentor to shoot with to really learn to do things right.

I will sell my F/4 and get the 2.8 IS, but it is going to be a while.


Randy D Dannheim:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gouba
Senior Member
480 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Auckland, Nz
     
May 19, 2008 14:27 |  #13

you definitely have the gear for it :)

I love the pressure and stress of the wedding situation :D it rocks, I love being under tonnes of pressure tho :D

I have a particularly hard wedding coming up and it was really bugging me, so I took my girlfriend out to the location and did a portrait shoot with her. I found out all these little things I would have done wrong.

Practice is the key, really practice, you have the gear to do it :)


www.matthamiltonphotog​raphy.com (external link)
5d mark 2, Canon 24-70, Canon 35L, Canon 580ex, Sigma 85 1.4, Sigma 70-200

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
randydannheim
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
34 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: I am a native of Phoenix, Arizona. In the good old USA
     
May 19, 2008 16:16 |  #14

thanks, going to location and taking some practice shots is a great idea.


Randy D Dannheim:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
newbie ­ builder
Senior Member
342 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Los Angeles, California
     
May 19, 2008 18:10 |  #15

+1 to the 2.8 thing...the first and only wedding i shot was almost all with a 17-55 2.8 and 80-200 2.8 (nikon lenses on nikon camera) and i still had to push the ISO to about 800 sometimes...fast glass and zooms are definitely the way to go for wedding photography, as well as a very good flash setup, as far as my brief bit of experience can tell. I had some nice primes with me (50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.4, 105 f/2) but every time I put one on, it quickly came off again because I was missing moments in the time it took me to back up or get closer--the ability to zoom was very helpful.


www.evanrobinsonphotog​raphy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,943 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
New to Weddings can I get by with the following equipment?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1703 guests, 134 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.