Taken with 50mm f/1.4 USM - Natural Lighting. C&C Welcome. Full Size Photo on my Flickr (listed in signature)
EDIT: The latest version with revisions will always be at the bottom of the thread...
PMatthes Senior Member 598 posts Joined May 2008 Location: Chicago-ish, IL More info | May 19, 2008 14:18 | #1 Taken with 50mm f/1.4 USM - Natural Lighting. C&C Welcome. Full Size Photo on my Flickr (listed in signature) -Pete
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JamesSalenger Goldmember 1,681 posts Likes: 39 Joined May 2008 Location: Virginia More info | May 19, 2008 15:04 | #2 very nice vignetting I may not be the village idiot, but I'll do until
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DrFil Senior Member 513 posts Joined May 2008 Location: Los Angeles More info | are her teeth naturally that white or did you touch them up in photoshop?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 19, 2008 16:36 | #4 DrFil wrote in post #5555925 are her teeth naturally that white or did you touch them up in photoshop? also, maybe i would use a slightly smaller aperture to get the DOF a little bigger. kinda bothers me that her bottom lip isn't in focus, but that's just my preference. nice picture overall. Very little touchup...just added a touch of brightness and a little blur to make them a more even white. But yep...she definitely keeps 'em white! -Pete
LOG IN TO REPLY |
trebuchet Member 152 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Wallingford, CT. USA More info | May 19, 2008 16:46 | #5 The teeth are TOO white IMHO. My attention gets draw right to them, and not the eyes. (which are beautiful BTW) "Just because I walk a different path, doesn't mean I am lost"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
After looking at it again, I agree... I took 'em down a bit and smoothed out a couple more details... better now?
-Pete
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kennykodak Member 160 posts Joined Mar 2008 More info | May 20, 2008 20:59 | #7 i'd take the lines out on the forehead. M.Photog.MEI.Cr.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 21, 2008 00:54 | #8 kennykodak wrote in post #5564523 i'd take the lines out on the forehead. I wasn't sure if I'd like it without the lines...but I gave it a shot...thanks for the advice. A little healing brush later... -Pete
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DrFil Senior Member 513 posts Joined May 2008 Location: Los Angeles More info | seeing as i know what the picture was like in a more "original" state, no, it doesn't look natural. but that's probably just because i'm focusing on the forehead, trying to find hints of editing. bias sucks.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
trebuchet Member 152 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Wallingford, CT. USA More info | May 21, 2008 07:05 | #10 The teeth look better now. If you could reshoot it, I would say increase the DOF to get her whole face in focus, vs just her right. Having both her eyes/eyelashes in focus (IMHO) would look better. I do like the background blur (Bokeh?) though. "Just because I walk a different path, doesn't mean I am lost"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 21, 2008 09:35 | #11 DrFil wrote in post #5566169 seeing as i know what the picture was like in a more "original" state, no, it doesn't look natural. but that's probably just because i'm focusing on the forehead, trying to find hints of editing. bias sucks. True, true...that's how I felt too, until I looked at the original again. I really like the edited one much more after seeing the original again...
Edited
-Pete
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Flo Gimmie Some Lovin 44,987 posts Likes: 16 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Nanaimo,B.C. More info | Pretty wife.but I agree with trebuchet,who said DOF would have been better suited with her entire face in focus.. you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
richardyoung Goldmember 1,679 posts Best ofs: 1 Likes: 1509 Joined Oct 2002 Location: Vegas More info | May 22, 2008 22:56 | #13 |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2905 guests, 176 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||