The daughter of some friends, breaking down field. I hope they like this one. 
I'm just bummed I didn't get the whole ball.
FF: 200mm: f/2.2; 1/1000; ISO 250.
 | Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE |
AeroSmith Goldmember  More info | May 19, 2008 14:47 | #1 The daughter of some friends, breaking down field. I hope they like this one.
Josh Smith
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Chandler. Goldmember  2,784 posts Likes: 4 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Issaquah More info | May 19, 2008 14:49 | #2 mmmmmm.... I want that. There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs. ~ Ansel Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ilovemycamera Goldmember  1,338 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: Southeast Arkansas More info | May 19, 2008 14:49 | #3 Aww! i wouldn't be bummed at all about the shot- she's VERY cute! GEAR: -7D---Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L---Canon 70-[COLOR=black]200 f2.8L IS---Canon 50mm 1.2L---Canon 16-35mm f/2.8L---Speedlite 580 EX---Canon 100mm 2.8 macro---gitzo gt2942---RRS BH-55
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 19, 2008 14:51 | #4 Chandler. wrote in post #5555324  mmmmmm.... I want that. I must say, I'm blown away. ilovemycamera wrote in post #5555327 Aww! i wouldn't be bummed at all about the shot- she's VERY cute! Thanks! Josh Smith
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HauntFreaks Member 127 posts Joined May 2008 Location: South Jersey More info | May 19, 2008 15:12 | #5 Not a fan of team sports... but that is a great photo... she is ssssssoooo sharp... this might be a nood question,.. has the background been blurred at all in post production? Canon 40D / sigma 8mm /sigma 15mm / 17-40L / 70-200 /420ex
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AdamLewis Goldmember  4,122 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Seattle, WA More info | May 19, 2008 16:42 | #6 Id rather see it with the ball more in focus and without the very distracting background. Not sure what you were going for with f/2.2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
big_apple_ken Goldmember  1,838 posts Likes: 1 Joined Apr 2008 Location: Hong Kong More info | This is a good looking photo. Only thing would be if she perked up her facial expression. Kind of looks a little like she is fall asleep...haha. Canon 5D3 | Canon 5D2 | Canon 5D | 15mm (fisheye) | 35L | 50L | 85L | 100L | 135L |16-35L | 24-70L | 70-200L IS | MP-E 65 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 19, 2008 19:01 | #8 HauntFreaks wrote in post #5555469 Not a fan of team sports... but that is a great photo... she is ssssssoooo sharp... this might be a nood question,.. has the background been blurred at all in post production? Many thanks! The blur is natural, straight from the camera. AdamLewis wrote in post #5556034 Id rather see it with the ball more in focus and without the very distracting background. Not sure what you were going for with f/2.2 Isolation of the subject? Testing a new lens. Pleasing the likes of the previous poster? big_apple_ken wrote in post #5556094 This is a good looking photo. Only thing would be if she perked up her facial expression. Kind of looks a little like she is fall asleep...haha. I know. WTF? Come on little girl get into it!
Josh Smith
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BigHands Goldmember 1,464 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Southern California More info | May 19, 2008 23:51 | #9 I'd crop it tight and call it good. Including all of the ball isn't that crucial to this shot's story. Canon 20D w/grip, 300D, Powershot SX100 w/HF-DC1 flash, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L, 85 f/1.8, 17-55 f/2.8 IS, 50 f/1.8, 580EX and some other stuff...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
VladDracule Senior Member 648 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2007 More info | May 19, 2008 23:52 | #10 i dunno what i like more...your gear list or the photo1...probly the gear list the photo didnt make me drool lol. Canon 40D, 70-200 f/4L, 28-135 IS, 50 f/1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JAcosta Goldmember  1,522 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Korea More info | May 19, 2008 23:57 | #11 AeroSmith wrote: FF: 200mm: f/2.2; 1/1000; ISO 250.
Like any of the photos Ive posted?flickr flickr flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HarrisonClicks Goldmember  1,113 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2007 Location: Mid-Atlantic USA More info | May 20, 2008 06:07 | #12 Aerosmith....  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Adam
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 20, 2008 09:00 | #13 VladDracule wrote in post #5558388 i dunno what i like more...your gear list or the photo1...probly the gear list the photo didnt make me drool lol. that 200 f/2 looks like an excellent lens! i do agree however that you should close down the aperture a bit with this age group especially. The younguns tend to kick the ball way out infront instead of keeping it close under control which is gonna make the ball OOF in alot of situations I agree, actually. The shot of my son was at f/5.6 IIRC. But I just got the 200 and wanted to see what the Platinum Brick could do wide open, or should I say nearly wide open. JAcosta wrote in post #5558407 Youre sick and cruel. Ill never be able to actually justify that lens but now you make me want to sooo bad. Great shot though. Thanks. 1080iAddict wrote in post #5559415 Aerosmith.... That is a GREAT shot of your son. The lighting was perfect! I am relatively new to trying to photograph my kids at their sports, but this was taken with my MIII and 70-200 f/2.8L IS lens: -Adam Thanks, Adam. The second shot I posted, the one of my son, was taken with the 70-200 f/2.8L IS. Though I actually sold that lens, among others, to help finance the purchase of the 200/2. Josh Smith
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2754 guests, 168 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
