Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 19 May 2008 (Monday) 21:39
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Rant: High Prices for Bad Quality Photography

 
form
THREAD ­ STARTER
"inadequately equipped"
Avatar
4,929 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Henderson, NV
     
May 22, 2008 17:37 |  #31

I know extremely basic php, but I could learn more. I know how to adjust the size of certain objects by browser width in css, but I remember having issues getting things to look good and keeping proportions correct.

tiziano: No, actually the other poster visual bride provided lots of useful information without seeming like a smart aleck. I wasn't looking for blind praise.


Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
form
THREAD ­ STARTER
"inadequately equipped"
Avatar
4,929 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Henderson, NV
     
May 22, 2008 21:02 as a reply to  @ form's post |  #32

Redid my website: Please have a look! Feedback? Opinions?

Thoughts and suggestions were addressed. I just need to redo ALL of the portfolio pictures to have white backgrounds.


Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jonstewart
Member
44 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Norn Irn
     
May 23, 2008 03:03 |  #33

That's so much better. Much cleaner. Navigation stands out better. Photos look better, because there's less clutter. The portrait portfolio (I didn't look at the others) looks good, but actual image transition is more like a blink than gradual fade. (this could be a browser thing)

It's a bit counter-intuitive having the secondary menu above the primary, but it works in a slightly unconventional way.

One minor thing; when I resize downward with Vista/FF20014, there's a point where the text (on the price etc, jumps out of the frame / container. Probably minor to fix.

Much, much, much better. Well done. and good on you for listening to what others said, and implementing what you thought would be useful.
Jon




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
form
THREAD ­ STARTER
"inadequately equipped"
Avatar
4,929 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Henderson, NV
     
May 23, 2008 09:40 |  #34

Thanks. Unfortunately I can't test it on vista myself because I don't have any computers that run it. I'm not sure how I'd go about making that compatible, but I already don't like vista.


Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stocky
Senior Member
Avatar
731 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
     
May 23, 2008 10:51 |  #35

The site acts a little funny with firefox on my mac as well. When you resize at a certain point the text gets pushed out of the box and jumps to the side.

I like the design much better, and I think you are almost there with your website now.


Always happy to hear some critique
gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jonstewart
Member
44 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Norn Irn
     
May 23, 2008 11:34 |  #36

Yes, firefox on my mac does the same, but latest Safari / Mac, that bit works fine. It's probably a firefox issue, rather than Vista. Don't have ie handy here, or I'd run it in that for you as well!
Jon




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
form
THREAD ­ STARTER
"inadequately equipped"
Avatar
4,929 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Henderson, NV
     
May 23, 2008 12:07 |  #37

Yes I'm running into that consistently. I tried to fix it by using margins and other positioning controls, but when it worked for my mac it didn't work at all on Win XP. I have to think about it for a while.


Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jonstewart
Member
44 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Norn Irn
     
May 23, 2008 15:50 |  #38

Actually, that's now working Firefox /OSX. I wonder did some of us not have the refreshed css file?

(Otherwise, you must have fixed it :-) )

EDIT: also working in Vista/IE7.006
Jon




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
form
THREAD ­ STARTER
"inadequately equipped"
Avatar
4,929 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Henderson, NV
     
May 23, 2008 15:54 |  #39

Everything is now contained in a single tag that is involved in centering; the different elements are no longer moving independently of each other.


Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alexajlex
Goldmember
1,292 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Munciana, Indiana
     
May 23, 2008 16:00 |  #40

Very nice site.

I'd say raise the price to $200 per hour.

The only suggestion I have is to integrate the pricing into 1 step.
I really find it a bit cumbersome to have to click on the Price button then to click on the event type (weddings, Portraits).
At first I was thinking the link was broken cause nothing came up (then I figured out I had to click on the event type).


Gear: 40D | XTi gripped | 85 1.8 | 50 1.8 | Sigma 20 1.8 | Canon 55-250 IS | Tamron 17-50 2.8 | Canon WD-58 WA Converter | 580EX II | Sunpak 383

"Amateurs worry about equipment, pros worry about money, masters worry about light..."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photoguy6405
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,399 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 31
Joined Feb 2008
Location: US Midwest
     
May 23, 2008 16:22 |  #41

I like the new website much better, also. Clear, easy to read, professional-looking, IMHO. My only quibble would be to remove the "Please bear with us..." comments. Even if some things aren't quite finished yet, they will be soon enough and there's no need to advertise the fact. Most people probably wouldn't even notice if you don't point it out to them.


Website: Iowa Landscape Photography (external link) | Blog (external link) | Gear List & Feedback
Equipment For Sale: Canon PowerShot A95

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
form
THREAD ­ STARTER
"inadequately equipped"
Avatar
4,929 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Henderson, NV
     
May 23, 2008 16:58 |  #42

Yay I'm finally getting somewhere. Now if only the damned thing got me any more business I'd be rewarded for my efforts in a better way (money!).


Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Visual ­ Bride
Senior Member
Avatar
539 posts
Joined Dec 2006
     
May 27, 2008 18:19 |  #43

Well done. Much much better.
This is a massive improvement. Your rant had a good outcome. Just remember that it will only effect your bottom line if people see the website.

The next question is how are people finding your site? Are they finding your site? How are those competitors found?
Sign up to Google Analytics for free and see what people are doing on your site and where they come from.


Simeon
| Asian Wedding Photography (external link) | Asian Wedding Cinematography (external link)
5Dx2 |35 1.4L | 85L 1.2 | 24-70L | 70-200mm 2.8L IS | 580 Flash
Wedding Videos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
form
THREAD ­ STARTER
"inadequately equipped"
Avatar
4,929 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Henderson, NV
     
May 28, 2008 12:58 |  #44

Thanks, I set up google analytics. I want to know how to improve my SEO so I can get to the forefront of some of the search engines with common search keywords. I have worked at it and reworked it, and I have made a different/alternate version of description, title, h1 and other tags, for each page, in order to maximize the variety of styles and wordings that can all lead to my site (different pages of it) and which might be picked up differently by search engines.


Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,089 views & 0 likes for this thread, 20 members have posted to it.
Rant: High Prices for Bad Quality Photography
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1829 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.