I think I'm correct in assuming Safety Shift - On prevents me from choosing an aperture or shutter speed that would result in an unusable photo. If I am correct about that, why would I ever want to choose Safety Shift - Off?
Thanks,
Jim
jimsolt Senior Member 758 posts Joined Apr 2004 Location: Palm Beach County, FL More info | Dec 18, 2004 10:08 | #1 I think I'm correct in assuming Safety Shift - On prevents me from choosing an aperture or shutter speed that would result in an unusable photo. If I am correct about that, why would I ever want to choose Safety Shift - Off?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dbump Senior Member 755 posts Joined Apr 2003 Location: Denver, CO More info | Dec 18, 2004 10:29 | #2 It sounds like the safety shift is a sort of auto-mode for Av, T, and M modes, if that makes sense. You'd turn it off if you thought/knew you could get the image you wanted even though the metering indicated otherwise. For example, if you were planning to take two identical shots at different metering, and later merge the two to remove the blown highlights from one image, and the lost shadow detail from the other, you'd want to disable this, because you'd be intentionally overexposing one, and underexposing the other. 7D, G10, 17-55 f/2.8 IS, 70-200 f/2.8 IS, 100 Macro, 50 f/1.4, 430EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bosamar Member 117 posts Joined May 2004 Location: So Cal Inland Empire More info | Good info to know! Thanks! Kodak DC260/Canon S200/Canon A95/Canon G6/Canon SD1100 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bauerman discount on value meals 3,457 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2003 Location: Idaho! More info | I personally do not feel that a capable camera like the G6 needs such an option and the crowd buying that camera should not need it. If you want a point and shoot camera - there are many out there. The G-series offers almost total control over exposure - as this class of camera should.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
soko Member 33 posts Joined Dec 2004 Location: Australia More info | Dec 18, 2004 15:49 | #5 This is my first post - bear with me (Ive been lurking for a long time!)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Well, the last 2 posts seem to have hit the nail on the head -- AND -- taken me beyond my limits in using this forum software. I want to quote from both of them.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dbump Senior Member 755 posts Joined Apr 2003 Location: Denver, CO More info | jimsolt wrote: My conclusion is that if I'm grabbing shots "on the run" or "as they're happening" and have enough time to go beyond AUTO, I might do well to use the safety shift. That sounds like a good use for the mode--hadn't thought of that. 7D, G10, 17-55 f/2.8 IS, 70-200 f/2.8 IS, 100 Macro, 50 f/1.4, 430EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
S45_fornow... Senior Member 530 posts Joined Dec 2003 Location: NC, USA More info | Sounds to me like the safety shift feature extends what is already a long list of user-friendly settings for amateurs and pros alike. If you don't need it, then don't use it....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bauerman discount on value meals 3,457 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2003 Location: Idaho! More info | Yeah - I wouldn't use it - for sure. Canon can have that setting back along with about half the other settings on my mode dial. Put the auto features on a camera marketed to an auto exposure consumer. I don't see why these things would be needed on the G6 - other than Canon knows there will be G6 users that will never move the dial to AV, TV or M.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
S45_fornow... Senior Member 530 posts Joined Dec 2003 Location: NC, USA More info | bauerman wrote: Yeah - I wouldn't use it - for sure. Canon can have that setting back along with about half the other settings on my mode dial. Put the auto features on a camera marketed to an auto exposure consumer. I don't see why these things would be needed on the G6 - other than Canon knows there will be G6 users that will never move the dial to AV, TV or M. Right. The Auto-mode is argueably the worst feature on the camera
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jon Cream of the Crop 69,628 posts Likes: 227 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bethesda, MD USA More info | Dec 21, 2004 11:53 | #11 I first came across Safety Shift on my Canon T-90, which, at the time, was one of Canon's pro-level SLRs (1985 or so). I never took the camera off that when I was shooting Tv or (rarely) AV. It has the effect of keeping your preferred shutter/aperture setting whenever possible, while protecting you at the margins. This gives you the secondary benefit that even when you forget to reset aperture/shutter speed when you're finished a session, you've got some insurance when you grab the camera for that once-in-a-lifetime shot the next day (and you know the conditions will be as far as possible from what you'd last been working in!). My D60 doesn't have it, and I miss it. The 20D does, and I've enabled it for that. But speaking as one who came up through the ranks, including meterless SLRs, match-needle metering, shutter-priority, and finally to full auto-exposure and autofocus systems, and processing my own (color and B&W) film and prints, I don't see Safety Shift as catering to an "Auto Exposure" mentality. It's a safeguard for those of us who are trying to get that shot, not missing it by a few seconds and we appreciate it. I really think you'd be surprised at how many of your "elite audience" appreciate being able to choose automated features; and Canon is catering to this. Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bauerman discount on value meals 3,457 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2003 Location: Idaho! More info | Jon,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
S45_fornow... Senior Member 530 posts Joined Dec 2003 Location: NC, USA More info | S45_fornow... wrote: Right. The Auto-mode is argueably the worst feature on the camera , but my guess is that 60-70% of the people that buy a G series camera need that mode to start out with until they learn to understand the effects of aperture and shutter speed... Don't forget that out of the thousands of G series cameras sold, only a small percentage of the buyers even end up on a forum like this to "learn". I think Canon has the marketing thing figured out pretty well, even though the advanced-skill users might not think so sometimes. Their goal is to sell as many of those buggers as possible, not just a few to an elite audience...I hope nobody took my comment about the "elite audience" too seriously. I only worded it that way to illustrate the point that the G6 is marketed for all types of shooters, beginner and expert alike. I for one wouldn't qualify as an elite user anyway...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2138 guests, 127 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||