J.A.F. Doorhof wrote:
Hi,
I live in the Netherlands in an area without sky polution and clear view most of the times.
Oh you are soooo lucky...
I allready own a 400mm lens and a 1.4x convertor when combining them I get arround 900mm (1.6x +1.4x) when looking at scopes they are arround 1000mm do I win very much or am I missing something ?
Frank
Telescope's are around 1000mm to 2000mm because the eyepieces they use are built for this range.
Eyepiece focal lengths ranges from 2mm to 40mm, giving you a magnification range of 25X to 1000X. Realistically anytthing > 300X is un-useable due to atmospheric disturbance (pooring seeing). Your DSLR behaves as if it have a 50mm / 1.6 eyepiece, so that will give you a pretty wide field at the low end of the magnification range.
You didn't mention the aperature of your telephoto lens. This is very important in astrophotograhpy.
Other consideration is the types of objects you are interested in, listed in order of difficulties:
Star trail: you can use a 50mm and a sturdy tripod.
Consternation: a 50mm but with a tracking mount.
Moon: your 400mm will do just fine. Keep the exposure to below 1/100 s to mininize the effect of earth's rotation.
Bright nebula: A 400mm will do, but you'll probably need both a large aperature and a good tracking mount.
Planets: You'll need anywhere from 5000mm to 10000mm, so eyepiece projection through a telescope. Since the magnification is so high, a good tracking mount is also necessary.
Deep sky objects: This is like bright nebula, except that the light are much much weaker. Exposure of several hours are not uncommon. I haven't try this since I live in a suburban area .
The difficulties you'll encounter will be many, but with a telephoto lens the first 2 are
1. locating the object.
2. focusing.
Ken