Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 19 Dec 2004 (Sunday) 03:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

photoshop CS slow?

 
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 19, 2004 03:57 |  #1

I'm wondering if it's my machine or if it's photoshop. At times it's slow as a dog. Most of the time it's fine, but for example when i'm in the browser and I try to flag a file (control - ' ) it can take 1-2 seconds. Is it me or is it just badly written?

btw I have a P4 2.66MHz, 768MB RAM, and other good things.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Dec 19, 2004 08:10 |  #2

Well, tim, a 2.66 MHz machine really is a darn slow machine but I'm sure you meant to say 2.666 GHz. :)

I have a 1.8 GHz PC with just 512 MB of RAM and when I flag a file, the response is instantaneous. Have you tried going into the task manager to see if there are any other programs running in your system; programs you are not aware of such as spyware, adware, etc.? Another thing you might want to look at is the settings of you PS preferences.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tumb
Senior Member
Avatar
380 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Location: OK
     
Dec 19, 2004 08:51 as a reply to  @ PacAce's post |  #3

tim - on your status bar, click the little triangle and select "efficeincy". If it is below 100% it means your RAM is full and PS is using scratch disc which is much slower than RAM. You can also go to Edit (File?)> Purge> All to clear some memory. Also, if this is happening, you can use a memory stick or SD card if you have a slot for scratch disc in lieu of adding RAM. They don't recommend using removable storage for scratch disc but I tried and it works, and is faster than writing to your hard drive.


Mike's Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MilesG
Senior Member
Avatar
253 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Grantham, England, UK
     
Dec 19, 2004 09:09 |  #4

photoshop cs works fine with me, i have to say it is fast

i also have photoshop elements 2 and have noticed this is a little faster tho


Web Address: http://www.milesgreen.​co.uk
E-Mail Address: mail@milesgreen.co.uk
Miles Green
Lincolnshire
England
UK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichardtheSane
Goldmember
Avatar
3,011 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Nottingham UK
     
Dec 19, 2004 09:46 as a reply to  @ MilesG's post |  #5

Using the file browser is the bit that slows it down, so I don't.


If in doubt, I shut up...

Gear: 40D, 12-24mm AT-X Pro, 17-85mm, Sigma 150mm Macro Sigma 100-300 F4, 550EX, other stuff that probably helps me on my way.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Headcase650
Goldmember
Avatar
1,632 posts
Joined Jun 2004
     
Dec 19, 2004 09:53 as a reply to  @ MilesG's post |  #6

Tumb, Can I use a CF card for scratch disc. I am running an older system. 933mh PIII, 256mg pc133, 20gig hd and windows xp pro. I dont have a lot of work flow but it does run extremely slow at times when using several layers, I know its due to my limited system. I have an hp printer that uses usb2 and has card slots in it. Is it posable to put a sandisc 256 ultra 2 card in the card slot, format it with windows and use it for scratch disk sense windows sees it as a removable hard drive. Would this speed things up . If so could you explain how to set up photoshop to use the card insted of my hard drive.

Thanks,
Adrian


60D, Canon 18-135 IS, Sigma 10-20 hsm, 24-70 2.8 hsm, 70-200 2.8 hsm, 430EX II, and all the other stuff that goes along with it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tumb
Senior Member
Avatar
380 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Location: OK
     
Dec 19, 2004 10:18 |  #7

Adrian - you would have to try it on your system to see if it works. Note that the manual recommends that you do not use removable memory for scratch disc, and you will get an error if you pull the stick and start PS again. I'm not at home now so don't have my manual with me, and I can't remember exactly how to set it up, but I think it's under preferences. I'll look later this evening when I get home and post back. I know on my desktop XP SP2 machine it works with a USB memory stick. I haven't tried it with my CF card reader but that's a good idea, I have a spare and will try tonight...

One more thing that might help, if you have dual drives it is faster if you set your scratch disc to the drive that PS is NOT installed in.


Mike's Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Steven ­ M. ­ Anthony
Senior Member
617 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN USA
     
Dec 19, 2004 10:21 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

If the above doesn't work... When using the file browser, make sure it does all its "tasks" before trying to do anything. For example, when you click on a folder, the browser updates certain files. If you try to do something while it's "busy" it is slowwwww. Look under the thumbnail section of the browser window. When it just shows the number of images/files, you should be good to go.


Steve
non calor sed umor...
www.smaphoto.com (external link)
www.smallbizwebmn.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
F1_Fan
Member
Avatar
120 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Victoria, BC
     
Dec 19, 2004 10:46 as a reply to  @ Headcase650's post |  #9

Headcase650 wrote:
Tumb, Can I use a CF card for scratch disc.

Flash media has a limited number of write cycles... maybe 100,000 or more (I know it was 100,000 a few years ago) but there is a limit. Using flash as a scratch disk would probably shorten it's lifespan significantly.

Even if you did want to go this route, it would be much slower than using a hard disk. If money is tight you'd be better off picking up a used 10GB (or smaller) hard disk for scratch/temp use.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
primoz
POTN Sports Photographer of the year 2005
Avatar
2,532 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Anywhere where ski World cup makes its stop
     
Dec 19, 2004 11:35 as a reply to  @ Headcase650's post |  #10

This definitely wouldn't speed things up. As soon as PS hits scratch disk it gets awful slow. And hard disks (where usually scratch is located) are A LOT faster then some CF card. So you can imagine how slow it would be when PS would hit scratch located on CF card. But otherwise yes it would work. I just don't even want to think how bad it would be :) And besides... with today's prices for disks, ram etc. it's much better idea to just buy another disk (they are about 100eur for 80GB or something here, and I would say we don't have lowest prices here).


PhotoSI (external link) | Latest sport photos (external link)http://www.photo.si (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Dec 19, 2004 13:08 |  #11

My PS was running slower than crap and I ended up rebuilding the preferences. Things were great after that. I *think* it was because I had checked something to allow the file browser to run in the background - I noticed that PS was using 60-80% of the CPU and I didn't even have an image open. Rebuilding the Preferences would have unchecked that, amongst other things. So I probably could have just unchecked the file browser setting and saved a couple minutes required to re-set all my preferences. It's still an educated guess about this, but I no longer use File Browser and my system has been fine since then.


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
THREAD ­ STARTER
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 19, 2004 13:16 |  #12

Yeah GHz... I gota stop posting while drunk ;)

I have no adware/spyware on my machine, plenty of free RAM, it's not swapping to disk, and the preferences are pretty much set at the default. I might go and play with the prefs and see if that helps. Thanks everyone :)


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Steven ­ M. ­ Anthony
Senior Member
617 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN USA
     
Dec 19, 2004 14:23 as a reply to  @ tim's post |  #13
bannedPermanent ban

Do what Scottes said--don't let things run in the background. And, you can set how much of your RAM is used by PS (in the preferences. I have 1Gig of RAM and have mine set for PS to use 75%.


Steve
non calor sed umor...
www.smaphoto.com (external link)
www.smallbizwebmn.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
THREAD ­ STARTER
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 19, 2004 14:26 |  #14

I'll have a look at that, thanks Steven. Didn't know you needed to do that, every other program on Windows manages its own memory without user intervention.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gex6
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Joined Dec 2004
     
Dec 20, 2004 16:31 |  #15

Yeah... oddly enough this happens to me too sometimes. I don't know whats wrong, I've run ad-aware about a million times :(, but photoshop 7 works fine with me, so I'm thinking about just sticking with 7.


FreeFileStash.com (external link) <<-- Your Own Personal 50Mb Online Storage Box!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,987 views & 0 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it.
photoshop CS slow?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1106 guests, 124 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.