Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 19 Dec 2004 (Sunday) 11:04
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Extender question

 
jimtfoto
Senior Member
Avatar
779 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Toronto Canada
     
Dec 19, 2004 11:04 |  #1

Just bought my wife a 2X extender for her Canon 100-400 L. She's using it on a 20D. Says there's no AF with the extender. I've searched the forums and there seems to be confusing input on this issue. Is there, or is there not, AF with this extender on a 100-400? Documentation indicates AF is slower, but how much slower? Canon web site also indicates there is AF ....
any input from users with the same equipment would be appreciated.
cheers,
jim


www.pix2go.ca (external link)
Sometimes I do get to places just when God is ready to have somebody click the shutter.
- Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cadwell
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,333 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Dec 19, 2004 11:14 |  #2

jimtfoto wrote:
Just bought my wife a 2X extender for her Canon 100-400 L. She's using it on a 20D. Says there's no AF with the extender. I've searched the forums and there seems to be confusing input on this issue. Is there, or is there not, AF with this extender on a 100-400? Documentation indicates AF is slower, but how much slower? Canon web site also indicates there is AF ....
any input from users with the same equipment would be appreciated.
cheers,
jim

A 20D is incapable of AF with a 100-400L and a 2x Extender.

A 20D can only AF with lenses which have a maximum aperture of f/5.6 or larger. Since the 2x Extender cost you two stops, the 100-400L effectively has a maximum aperture of f/11 at the long end. Way out of spec..


Glenn
My Pictures: Motorsport (external link)/Canoe Polo (external link)/Other Stuff (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jimtfoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
779 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Toronto Canada
     
Dec 19, 2004 11:24 as a reply to  @ Cadwell's post |  #3

Cadwell:
Thanks for the quick reply ... looks like she'll be using that setup with a tripod ....
cheers,
jim


www.pix2go.ca (external link)
Sometimes I do get to places just when God is ready to have somebody click the shutter.
- Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,927 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10124
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Dec 19, 2004 11:44 |  #4

Jim,

Please take a look at the -=READ FIRST=- EOS "Sticky" Thread at the top of this foprum,.. :)

In one of the links, I think you may find some additional info on teleconverters that you may find helpfull.
;)


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
defordphoto
MKIII Aficionado
9,888 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2002
Location: Pacific Northwest
     
Dec 19, 2004 11:47 as a reply to  @ CyberDyneSystems's post |  #5

As an aside, the 20D (also 10D, D30, D60, Drebel) will also not achieve AF on the 100-400 with the 1.4xTC.


defordphoto | Celebrating the art of photography®
SD500, 10D, 20D, 30D, 5D, 1DMKII, 1DMKIII
www.ussbaracing.com (external link) | www.rfmsports.com (external link) | www.nwfjcc.com (external link)
An austere and pleasant poetry of the real. Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jimtfoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
779 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Toronto Canada
     
Dec 19, 2004 11:49 as a reply to  @ defordphoto's post |  #6

CDS:
apologies for asking a question for which there is already a suitable explanation ....

JIM:
thanks for the added info

cheers,
jim


www.pix2go.ca (external link)
Sometimes I do get to places just when God is ready to have somebody click the shutter.
- Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bruce ­ Watson
Senior Member
Avatar
530 posts
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Ajax for the work week and on weekends, south of Ottawa, Canada
     
Dec 19, 2004 13:09 as a reply to  @ jimtfoto's post |  #7

If this is of any help:

http://www.fredmiranda​.com/TipsPage/ (external link)


Cheers,
Bruce Watson
My Camera Bag Overfloweth...........​....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,927 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10124
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Dec 19, 2004 13:39 |  #8

The above mentioned "tape trick" may be worth a try in some cases.. but is unlikely to work with a 2X + 100-400mm on a 20D.. this is just too far out of spec. Many have good results with the 1.4X on the 100-400mm,....

HOWEVER.. this trick is NOT without it's risks!

On the bright side.. it may be worth a try in many acases.. and things may work fine.

Worst case scenario results in a burned out focus motor.
If you note ANY signs of unusual behavior (hunting, noise, sporadic AF performance) I'd advise removing the tape ASAP.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jimtfoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
779 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Toronto Canada
     
Dec 20, 2004 13:07 as a reply to  @ CyberDyneSystems's post |  #9

Thanks all the same, but ... there's too much of an investment already in the camera, lens and extender (remember, we're talking Canadian dollars here) to risk any damage using the "tape trick."

cheers, and thanks all,
jim


www.pix2go.ca (external link)
Sometimes I do get to places just when God is ready to have somebody click the shutter.
- Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phil ­ Hall
Member
178 posts
Joined May 2002
     
Dec 20, 2004 14:39 |  #10

Go out and buy her the 1.4x extender. It works with the 100-400 lense. The 2x extender works with the 70-200 mm f2.8 lense.

Phil Hall


Phil Hall
Santa Ynez CA
1D;1Ds;1D MkII;16-35:28-135:70-200;100-400;600;550EX;580EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robertwgross
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,462 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2002
Location: California
     
Dec 20, 2004 14:59 as a reply to  @ Phil Hall's post |  #11

Somebody might ask the question about risks of the tape trick.

First of all, you could apply the tape to the teleconverter's gold contacts, or you could apply it to the camera's gold contacts. Since the camera is more valuable than the teleconverter, you risk more by doing it to the camera.

Second, you use tape to serve as an electrical insulator between the gold contacts. Well, most tape has one slick side and one sticky side. The sticky side will make it stick to the gold contacts, and if you want to do this semi-permanently, then OK. However, if you intend to remove the tape, the stickiness may be left on the gold contacts. Worse yet, once the stickiness is left on the gold contacts of the teleconverter, you may transfer it to the gold contacts of the camera. That stickiness may act as an intermittent insulator even with only your favorite lens in place. Not good.

So, if you feel compelled to use the tape trick, use two pieces. (Imagine this) Use one piece an inch long, and then use another piece 3/4 inch long, and place the shorter piece sticky side to sticky side with the longer piece so that there are only two 1/8 inch sticky ends to hold the tape in place _away_ from the gold contacts. This still is not foolproof, but it can eliminate some potential problems.

---Bob Gross---




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cadwell
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,333 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Dec 20, 2004 15:05 as a reply to  @ Phil Hall's post |  #12

Phil Hall wrote:
Go out and buy her the 1.4x extender. It works with the 100-400 lense. The 2x extender works with the 70-200 mm f2.8 lense.

Phil Hall

The 20D won't autofocus with the 100-400L and 1.4x Extender either, sorry. That combination only works on a 1 Series dSLR.


Glenn
My Pictures: Motorsport (external link)/Canoe Polo (external link)/Other Stuff (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,880 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Extender question
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2254 guests, 136 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.