Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 22 May 2008 (Thursday) 22:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Can you tell if it's a good copy of a 24-70 L?

 
majs
Member
134 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
May 22, 2008 22:33 |  #1

Hi,

Just got this lens today :). This is my first L lens and I'd like to make sure I have a good copy. Thanks!

Here's the original no PP, just resized for web at 4x6 ...

IMAGE: http://www.jkmsite.com/photography/24-70a.jpg

100% crop
IMAGE: http://www.jkmsite.com/photography/24-70c.jpg

edited with exif on 100% crop



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
equetefue
Goldmember
Avatar
1,603 posts
Gallery: 230 photos
Likes: 4989
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Orlando, Florida
     
May 22, 2008 22:37 |  #2

without an embedded EXIF is hard to tell a lot of things


http://www.Photo-Galleria.com (external link)

Powered By Canon
EOS R l 5D MkIV l 7D MkII l 5D l 30D IR l 500mm f4 L IS l RF 24-105mm f4 L l 50mm f1.8 l 17-40mm f4 L l 135mm f2 L l 100-400mm f5.6 L L IS II l 100mm f2.8 USM Macro l EF 1.4x III l EF 2.0x III l 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SilverHCIC
Goldmember
Avatar
1,460 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Swimming, cycling or running ... somewhere in California
     
May 22, 2008 22:38 |  #3
bannedPermanent ban

Post the EXIF. This looks soft, but without knowing what length you were shooting and what shutter speed, it's hard to tell whether it's from camera movement.


"It's easy to find your bike in transition when you're the last one out of the ocean ... it's no fun being lost at sea :rolleyes:."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
majs
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
134 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
May 22, 2008 22:42 |  #4

How do you do that if you're using CS2 and want to embed this information. Thanks!

Figured it out ... did a save as instead of save for web.

Please check again. Thanks!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
majs
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
134 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
May 22, 2008 23:00 |  #5

OK both image should now have the exif info. Thanks!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eyusuf
Senior Member
Avatar
480 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Bethlehem PA
     
May 22, 2008 23:03 as a reply to  @ majs's post |  #6

where was your focus on the shot?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
majs
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
134 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
May 22, 2008 23:07 |  #7

On the dog.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dorman
Goldmember
Avatar
4,661 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Halifax, NS
     
May 22, 2008 23:09 |  #8

How about you type out the EXIF for us lazy folks? ;)

It looks a bit overexposed or shot at high ISO without knowing the EXIF - that explains the washed our colors and lack of contrast. As for sharpness, let's continue investigating.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eyusuf
Senior Member
Avatar
480 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Bethlehem PA
     
May 22, 2008 23:11 |  #9

majs wrote in post #5579230 (external link)
On the dog.

dude, if you focused on the dog, you definitely got a problem with the 1000-bux-lens




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
liquefied
Goldmember
Avatar
1,160 posts
Joined Oct 2006
     
May 22, 2008 23:14 |  #10

ISO 1600 ruins sharpness.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SlyJosh
Member
68 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Torrance CA(home) or Tempe AZ (Arizona State)
     
May 22, 2008 23:16 |  #11

Your EXIF says you were using iso 1600 which is way too much in daylight, which is also why it is overexposed. Keep it to 100 or 200 for the day and try again. The 24-70 has a slight learning curve but it is well worth it.


My Gear So Far.........

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
angryhampster
"Got a thick monopod?"
Avatar
3,860 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2006
Location: Iowa
     
May 22, 2008 23:21 |  #12

SlyJosh wrote in post #5579284 (external link)
Your EXIF says you were using iso 1600 which is way too much in daylight, which is also why it is overexposed. Keep it to 100 or 200 for the day and try again. The 24-70 has a slight learning curve but it is well worth it.

The lens really has no learning curve, the OP needs to read the camera's manual first. :idea:


Steve Lexa
Iowa City Wedding Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BEEEsH
Senior Member
652 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Toronto
     
May 22, 2008 23:25 |  #13

I'll have to agree that this isn't the best shot for testing/sampling.

Take another at ISO100/200, and tripod mount it.


EOS 5D MK II
16-35mm F2.8L II - 24-105mm F4L - 35mm F1.4L - 85mm F1.2L II - 70-300 IS -
580EX II - MANFROTTO 055D w/RC 141 - DOMKE F3X - Nanuk 940 White

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
liquefied
Goldmember
Avatar
1,160 posts
Joined Oct 2006
     
May 22, 2008 23:27 |  #14

angryhampster wrote in post #5579299 (external link)
The lens really has no learning curve, the OP needs to read the camera's manual first. :idea:

Yeah, I don't really understand the whole 'learning curve' of a lens. If you know how to use your camera then you know how to use any lens on it.

edit: Except for TS lenses which do require some experimentation and practice.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon ­ Soldier
..."kind of like Zooms"?
803 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Arrested with no pants in the nuthouse
     
May 22, 2008 23:29 |  #15

yeah, just make sure you know all the littlw switches and its just like using any other lens... As for the OP's shot, 1600 is no way to judge sharpness. To judge it, shoot an object on a tripod with MF at iso 100 and a 100 percent crop.


Na, just kidding, you are still a loser.
^^ If you higlight this you will be cool ^^

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,918 views & 0 likes for this thread, 20 members have posted to it.
Can you tell if it's a good copy of a 24-70 L?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1740 guests, 136 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.