MACRO on it? It's not really considered a macro lens is it?
gramps Goldmember 1,058 posts Joined Oct 2004 Location: Mt. WhereinthehellamI? Southen Utah More info | Dec 19, 2004 12:37 | #1 MACRO on it? It's not really considered a macro lens is it? Some pics here - http://pbase.com/sjh
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PacAce Cream of the Crop 26,900 posts Likes: 40 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Keystone State, USA More info | Dec 19, 2004 12:58 | #2 I think that's because you can get pretty darn close to your subject with that lens than you could with ordinary lenses. My 28-135 IS allows me to get some very close flower pictures and it also says "Macro" on it but it doesn't focus as close as the 24-70 does. But you are right, it's not a true macro (as in 1:1 magnification) lens. ...Leo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2254 guests, 136 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||