Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 24 May 2008 (Saturday) 21:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Composition Critique

 
davemills
Member
Avatar
140 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Como NSW Australia
     
May 24, 2008 21:20 |  #1

I would like some feedback on the composition of this shot and the B&W conversion. This conversion was done with channel mixer in PS,any other suggested methods?


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Dave
30D, 17-85 IS USM, 70-200 f4L, 60 f2.8 macro, 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
swjim
Goldmember
1,669 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 29
Joined Jan 2006
     
May 24, 2008 21:26 |  #2

I like the composition Dave. My only comment re: the conversion is it looks like you may have clipped some of the shadow detail in the rocks off the the right and the trees to the left of the bridge.


Jim

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark0159
I say stupid things all the time
Avatar
12,935 posts
Gallery: 45 photos
Likes: 286
Joined Mar 2003
Location: Hamilton, New Zealand
     
May 25, 2008 04:13 |  #3

I like the way you have edited the photo. However I would trim some of the top and bottom. this will give the photo more focus on what you want the viewer to look at.

something like this:


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Mark
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/52782633@N04 (external link)
Canon EOS 6D | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, EF 17-40mm f/4L USM, EF 50mm f/1.4 USM, EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM | Tamron SP 35mm F1.8 Di VC USD | Canon Speedlite 550EX -|- Film | Canon EOS 3 | Olympus OM2 | Zuiko 35mm f2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yogestee
"my posts can be a little colourful"
Avatar
13,845 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 41
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Australia
     
May 25, 2008 08:00 as a reply to  @ Mark0159's post |  #4

Dave,,your compostion is fine..In relation to the B/W conversion it looks a bit flat and you have lost shadow detail in the foreground rocks as Jim mentioned..

theflyingkiwi,,,,I disagree with your edit..Cropping off the rocks in the
foreground you have lost any depth in the image,,it looks too 2 dimensional..


Jurgen
50D~EOS M50 MkII~EOS M~G11~S95~GoPro Hero4 Silver
http://www.pbase.com/j​urgentreue (external link)
The Title Fairy,, off with her head!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
May 25, 2008 22:10 |  #5

Dear Dave,

My nit-pick suggestion in regard to composition would be to avoid the situation you have right at the very middle of the bottom margin. There is a dip in the rocks at that point that causes an unfortunate point of tension due to the way that contour just kisses the frame. Most people will be drawn to that point, and that is not where you want them to be looking.


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davemills
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
140 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Como NSW Australia
     
May 26, 2008 00:32 |  #6

All, Thanks for the comments they have been most useful and have added to my knowledge base.


Dave
30D, 17-85 IS USM, 70-200 f4L, 60 f2.8 macro, 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
37,970 posts
Gallery: 179 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 13442
Joined May 2007
Location: Oak Park, Illinois
     
May 28, 2008 08:41 as a reply to  @ davemills's post |  #7

Dave you should try and avoid cutting the frame in half when shooting landscapes. It tends to make for a very static image (a fancy way to say boring).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

985 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Composition Critique
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2797 guests, 163 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.