DerekRob Goldmember 2,535 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: no where More info | May 24, 2008 21:41 | #1 Permanent banTv mod iso 100 Shutter speed 1/2000 uv filter + macro Is it because the iso was 100 when we didn't need such a low iso? The sun was full on when you can by the photo. And this is me by the way
LOG IN TO REPLY |
eddarr There's Moderators under there.... 8,907 posts Likes: 5 Joined Aug 2007 Location: Las Vegas More info | May 24, 2008 22:29 | #2 |
May 24, 2008 22:31 | #3 Permanent baneddarr wrote in post #5590626 Looks like it was in manual focus and not focused on the subject. The dobro is reasonable clear around your knees. Is it because of the macro filter?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
eddarr There's Moderators under there.... 8,907 posts Likes: 5 Joined Aug 2007 Location: Las Vegas More info | May 24, 2008 22:41 | #4 |
May 24, 2008 22:46 | #5 Permanent baneddarr wrote in post #5590689 You had an add on macro filter on front of the lens? That would definitely be it. It was trying to focus about a foot in front of the lens. I did, So the iso was ok though?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gdykstra Goldmember 1,330 posts Best ofs: 1 Likes: 190 Joined May 2007 Location: Duluth, Georgia More info | May 24, 2008 22:53 | #6 Here is your Exif data, your shutter speed was 1/200 not 1/2000. But that should not have made a difference for this shot. Why would you use a macro filter? Model Mayhem
LOG IN TO REPLY |
eddarr There's Moderators under there.... 8,907 posts Likes: 5 Joined Aug 2007 Location: Las Vegas More info | May 24, 2008 22:53 | #7 |
May 24, 2008 22:56 | #8 Permanent banOk and I've read on this forum it was a good idea to use a macro filter when you shoot in tv mode and or portret mode.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
eddarr There's Moderators under there.... 8,907 posts Likes: 5 Joined Aug 2007 Location: Las Vegas More info | May 24, 2008 23:07 | #9 Boy would I like to see who said that. I think you may have had a brain fart. No filter is best used when shooting in tv or portrait mode. The camera mode has nothing to do with filters or lens. And definitely not a macro filter. They are about the worst thing you could put in front of a lens.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jra Cream of the Crop 6,568 posts Likes: 35 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Ohio More info | May 24, 2008 23:08 | #10 I would agree....drop the macro filter.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 24, 2008 23:11 | #11 Permanent banSo drop the macro filter and the uv filter? or keep the uv filter?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
eddarr There's Moderators under there.... 8,907 posts Likes: 5 Joined Aug 2007 Location: Las Vegas More info | May 24, 2008 23:17 | #12 If it is a quality UV filter you can leave it on. It will do a decent job of protecting the lens.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 24, 2008 23:21 | #13 Permanent baneddarr wrote in post #5590835 If it is a quality UV filter you can leave it on. It will do a decent job of protecting the lens. Shoot in manual if you are used to it. Otherwise, shoot in AV at around f/6.0 with as low an ISO that will keep the shutter speed above 1/125 or so. If the shutter speed is to slow then increase the ISO. I can do and I'm not used to m mode yet.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 25, 2008 00:30 | #14 Permanent baneddarr wrote in post #5590626 Looks like it was in manual focus and not focused on the subject. The dobro is reasonable clear around your knees. I'm surprised you knew what a do-bro was, Thats cool.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GlennNK Goldmember 4,630 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Victoria, BC More info | May 25, 2008 01:15 | #15 The most common and descriptive name for a "macro filter" is "closeup lens". I have a Canon 500D (pricy as hell), and it really limits the maximum focus distance of any lens. On my 24/105 at a FL of 105 mm, the maximum focus distance is about three feet; at 24 mm, it's about eight feet. Obviously neither are anywhere near infinity. When did voluptuous become voluminous?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2863 guests, 169 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||