Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 26 May 2008 (Monday) 22:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

I thought 1D series bodies were supposed to be the best?? WHY THIS ALWAYS HAPPENS???

 
this thread is locked
Adaptive
don't defend yourself, call modday
Avatar
1,018 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Filth-a-delphia
     
May 26, 2008 22:33 |  #1

The story:
I started off with 20d/30d probably 5 or 6 years ago. Never really had an issue with soft images. Eventually moved up to 5D, still great images with no issues of having soft images. My expertise is in portrait work but I often find myself doing other gigs for money (sports / weddings / events).

The problem:
So I picked up a high mileage 1D Mark IIN a while back. I had an issue with the people in my photos being soft but the background was sharp. This only happens when shooting from a distance, and It NEVER happens in studio. (70-200 f/2.8L IS) I read and read and read everything I can find and no answer. So one day I'm playing around and I figure that I'm using one shot "regular". So I try to use one shot "high speed - Low" mode. And the problem is not as bad, but the people in my photos are still a tad bit soft. So I blame it on the camera, send it in to get fixed at canon, they say nothign is wrong and send it back. So I sell it and buy my current 1dmk2N with only 488 shutter actuations. Can't get any newer than that so I figured there would be no issue. I GET THE SAME DAM PROBLEM WITH THIS CAMERA!!!!!!!!!!

I have been trying different styles of taking pictures to solve this problem. Mashing the trigger, beep then click, everything possible.

I recently started shooting hockey games for this dood who shoots nikon. I look at his images and they are sharp as hell, I'm embarassed to even compare photos. He is using D200 with 70-200VR with 1.4TC and his images are still sharper??? I thought the 1D Mark IIN was supposed to be a great camera for sports?

Here is a sample of the softness. It's not nothing too bad to b!tch about but jesus there has got to be an answer to why this is not sharp.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheHoff
Don't Hassle....
Avatar
8,804 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
May 26, 2008 22:37 |  #2

Most certainly mis-focus... perhaps a misunderstanding of focus points? Tough to tell from the small shot but the stitching on the mitt looks sharp.

What focus point are you using? Have you tried shooting at a higher ISO for the hockey so you can stop the lens down more for more depth of field? (ie, shoot at 5.6 instead of 2.8 )


••Vancouver Wedding Photographer  (external link)••| [gear list] | Latest blog: 5 steps to stopping image loss (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Adaptive
THREAD ­ STARTER
don't defend yourself, call modday
Avatar
1,018 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Filth-a-delphia
     
May 26, 2008 22:40 |  #3

In this shot:

- I was in the penalty box so I have great access to get great shots, this kid was right by me at the box in between periods. So he was really close, I should have a great super sharp image since he is soo close.

- I have control of the lights in the rink (pocket wizzards) so lights were used and should be a great help to make images extra crisp.

- I have a 1D Mark IIN supposedly a great camera for getting tight shots of things in motion. This kid is not moving and I can't get a tight shot of his face???? I'm doing something wrong, custom functions? drive mode? what is it?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Adaptive
THREAD ­ STARTER
don't defend yourself, call modday
Avatar
1,018 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Filth-a-delphia
     
May 26, 2008 22:42 |  #4

TheHoff wrote in post #5602215 (external link)
Most certainly mis-focus... perhaps a misunderstanding of focus points? Tough to tell from the small shot but the stitching on the mitt looks sharp.

What focus point are you using? Have you tried shooting at a higher ISO for the hockey so you can stop the lens down more for more depth of field? (ie, shoot at 5.6 instead of 2.8 )

That shot was taken at f/7.1 everything in the image should be super tight. He was directly under one of the lights so I had to adjust my aperture accordingly. Shutter speed was at 250/sec so there is no way he's moving too fast even though he's just sitting there.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Adaptive
THREAD ­ STARTER
don't defend yourself, call modday
Avatar
1,018 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Filth-a-delphia
     
May 26, 2008 22:59 |  #5

Tomorrow I'm going to shoot some comparison pictures from 30D and 1DmarkIIN. To see the difference in sharpness. I guarantee the 30D images will be sharper. I know the lens and camera are not damaged or anything, there is just some setting I don't know about. Anyone out there have a 1D? Still no answers or suggestions?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheHoff
Don't Hassle....
Avatar
8,804 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
May 26, 2008 23:14 |  #6

Sorry, there was no EXIF attached to the image before.

Is there any part of the image that is sharp to you at 100%?

It would then sound like a mis-focus. Load up Zoombrowser or the EOS Viewer from Canon and you can see what focus point was used. Do you know? Was it on center point? If you're confident that the focus point was over his face, it would be a mis-alignment of that lens with that camera. Luckily with the 1D you can do micro-adjustment per lens.

http://www.northlight-images.co.uk …s3_af_micoadjus​tment.html (external link)


••Vancouver Wedding Photographer  (external link)••| [gear list] | Latest blog: 5 steps to stopping image loss (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Adaptive
THREAD ­ STARTER
don't defend yourself, call modday
Avatar
1,018 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Filth-a-delphia
     
May 26, 2008 23:52 |  #7

link says 1DSmarkIII and 1DmarkIII only

Yes focus was on the kids face, whole image is a little soft. Might not be an issue for the rest of you guys, but for me when seeing the images from a $1500 nikon body vs my $2500 canon body I get a little upset when their prosumer body produces better images than my pro body even though we're both using the same settings.....

Here is a 100% crop of the glove that you said looked sharp

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Adaptive
THREAD ­ STARTER
don't defend yourself, call modday
Avatar
1,018 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Filth-a-delphia
     
May 27, 2008 00:31 |  #8

I know it's not an issue of the camera having problems or the lens having problems. I've had 2 1D Mark IIN's do the same thing with the same glass. And my 5D and 30D do not have this problem. Tomorrow I will do a test to show everyone what I'm talking about, how the sharpness on the 1D and 30D are different. I can already bet $1000 that the 30D images will be sharper at 200mm.

THERE HAS TO BE SOME KIND OF SETTING ON THE 1D THAT I DON'T KNOW ABOUT

Anyone with 1D have any advice?

I did find out that High speed Low and High speed High is good for taking pictures of people and that the single box is good for taking pictures of still things like product photography. I thought that the 1DmkIIN would give me a good keeper rate, but at this point I think I might have better luck sticking to 30D until I can figure out what settings I have to play with on the 1D.

Or maybe just switch to Nikon and I wont have to play around with any settings....




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BOSS
Gone, but not forgotten
2,610 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2007
Location: QLD,Australia
     
May 27, 2008 01:56 as a reply to  @ Adaptive's post |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

have your lenses got IS? is it on/off?
and last but not least RTFM.


John
The more I know people the more I love my dogs.
Canon 400D 18-55,75-300,60 macro, 24-105L 100-400L IS,580EXII, 430EX,tripod,monopod plus lots more
SPQR

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
iamaelephant
Senior Member
Avatar
336 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: New Zealand
     
May 27, 2008 02:10 |  #10

Adaptive wrote in post #5602825 (external link)
Or maybe just switch to Nikon and I wont have to play around with any settings....

With an attitude like that you may as well ditch DSLR altogether and grab yourself a point & shoot.


-- Martin
Canon 30D | Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 | EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blackcap
Senior Member
415 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2007
     
May 27, 2008 03:29 |  #11

Have you tried a focus test like this to see if your camera is front/back focussing?

http://focustestchart.​com/focus21.pdf (external link)

More details here: http://focustestchart.​com/chart.html (external link)

Sorry if this sounds amateurish.


_______________
www.chrisgin.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LBaldwin
Goldmember
Avatar
4,490 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2006
Location: San Jose,CA
     
May 27, 2008 03:46 |  #12

The other thought is in camera sharpining.Where do you have it set.I use the same camera and I am pretty sure I have it set at 3 or so.

Make sure that the rear element of your lens is clean as well. I had a thumb print on one mine that gave a similier effect to the image. It is a new camera so I would not suspect a sensor issue but how about the rear lens mount is it nice and tight?

If you can dupe it under controlled conditions that would help. Also is this directly from the RAW file? or was it taken from a jpeg.


Les Baldwin
http://www.fotosfx.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KIPAX
Goldmember
Avatar
1,261 posts
Likes: 33
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Accrington, England
     
May 27, 2008 05:33 |  #13

Adaptive wrote in post #5602825 (external link)
THERE HAS TO BE SOME KIND OF SETTING ON THE 1D THAT I DON'T KNOW ABOUT

Anyone with 1D have any advice?

I started with this then changed as I got more used to the camera..

http://www.siphoto.com​/?canon1DM2.inc (external link)


In my tenth year as a Full time Sports Photographer.
living the dream at www.kipax.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Adaptive
THREAD ­ STARTER
don't defend yourself, call modday
Avatar
1,018 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Filth-a-delphia
     
May 27, 2008 06:55 |  #14

BOSS wrote in post #5603064 (external link)
have your lenses got IS? is it on/off?
and last but not least RTFM.


Believe me, if there is some simple solution I would not be wasting my time posting on here. It's 7am, I just woke up, what's RTMF?

iamaelephant wrote in post #5603102 (external link)
With an attitude like that you may as well ditch DSLR altogether and grab yourself a point & shoot.


I spend close to $3000 on a camera and I expect it to have the capability to take sharp images equally nice to the images taken by my 5D and 30D, do I not have the right to be pissed off? And these Nikon cameras are sharp as balls right out of the box no tweaking needed. The guy that has the D200 that I was using knows pretty much nothing about photography and his images are sharper than mine? There is absolutely no way he sat around tweaking any settings. I'm surprised that clown even knows where the shutter is.

blackcap wrote in post #5603313 (external link)
Have you tried a focus test like this to see if your camera is front/back focussing?

http://focustestchart.​com/focus21.pdf (external link)

More details here: http://focustestchart.​com/chart.html (external link)

Sorry if this sounds amateurish.


100% sure the camera focuses fine, I will look at this later today when I get home from work. I will also try with my 30D and 5D to see difference.

LBaldwin wrote in post #5603357 (external link)
The other thought is in camera sharpining.Where do you have it set.I use the same camera and I am pretty sure I have it set at 3 or so.

Make sure that the rear element of your lens is clean as well. I had a thumb print on one mine that gave a similier effect to the image. It is a new camera so I would not suspect a sensor issue but how about the rear lens mount is it nice and tight?

If you can dupe it under controlled conditions that would help. Also is this directly from the RAW file? or was it taken from a jpeg.


I will give my lenses and camera a through cleaning when I get home. I'm pretty sure no amount of dirt will do this, but at this point I'm desperate to find a solution. Rear lens mount is pretty tight. Directly from jpg, no editing, i don't shoot raw too often especially at weddings and hockey games, no need really. Camera sharpening is at +3 I believe, I would not have it set to negative sharpening I know that much.

KIPAX wrote in post #5603599 (external link)
I started with this then changed as I got more used to the camera..

http://www.siphoto.com​/?canon1DM2.inc (external link)


thanks, yeah I think you or someone posted this in another thread, I'm definitely going to give this a try later today.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
May 27, 2008 07:03 |  #15

Is this the first in a series or only shot? When using AI Servo, it's shutter-release priority as opposed to focus-priority as in one-shot so the first frame is almost always out of focus. It's best to fire at least a short burst when shooting action.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

10,543 views & 0 likes for this thread, 32 members have posted to it.
I thought 1D series bodies were supposed to be the best?? WHY THIS ALWAYS HAPPENS???
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1061 guests, 115 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.