Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 27 May 2008 (Tuesday) 11:19
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Before and after PP C&C please

 
scotthidley
Senior Member
528 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2006
Location: OH, USA
     
May 27, 2008 11:19 |  #1

Here's the before and after. Any and all feedback appreciated. Especially regarding the tone of the main boat.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flo
Gimmie Some Lovin
Avatar
44,987 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Nanaimo,B.C.
     
May 27, 2008 11:37 |  #2

Probably just me, but I really like the first shot much better.it evokes a mood.


you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mattograph
"God bless the new meds"
Avatar
7,693 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
     
May 27, 2008 11:40 |  #3

Flo wrote in post #5605134 (external link)
Probably just me, but I really like the first shot much better.it evokes a mood.

I'm with Flo. I tend to like warmer photos better, anyway, but the lighting feels much truer to me in the first one. Nice composition, btw.


This space for rent.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scotthidley
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
528 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2006
Location: OH, USA
     
May 27, 2008 12:38 |  #4

The sky really was more vivid and darker than it appears in the first photo. I really think the sky is much more accurate in the 2nd. I think the hue in the boat is what's setting the mood of the pictures, and will try to work with that some more. I'm still not quite happy with it in the 2nd as it looks a little off to me. Thanks for the comments.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scotthidley
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
528 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2006
Location: OH, USA
     
Jun 08, 2008 13:28 |  #5

Here's my latest after some light gradient layers on the boat. Please let me know how I did.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joedlh
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,511 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 684
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Long Island, NY, N. America, Sol III, Orion Spur, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Cluster, Laniakea.
     
Jun 09, 2008 13:03 |  #6

Six of one, a half dozen of the other. My big question is what's lighting up the stern of the vessel? It seems a little incongruous to me, given that the camera is pointing to the setting sun. Two light sources.


Joe
Gear: Kodak Instamatic, Polaroid Swinger. Oh you meant gear now. :rolleyes:
http://photo.joedlh.ne​t (external link)
Editing ok

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scotthidley
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
528 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2006
Location: OH, USA
     
Jun 09, 2008 14:21 |  #7

Yes, there was a street lamp just off the stern (to my right of the shot). So I'm trying to correct for tungsten lighting on the boat while the rest is natural light. The sun was actually already down for at least an hour. We had dinner after sunset, then I took this on our walk back to the hotel. While the first 2 people liked the original shot more, the latter pics are much closer to how the sky really appeared. I guess another question is what shots do or don't look believable, and why? My goal is to have this looking natural, not overdone.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Whitley
Senior Member
Avatar
260 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Hermitage, TN
     
Jun 09, 2008 14:37 |  #8

I like hte 1st one best too...


40D/BG-E2N 5D/BG-E44
10-22, 24-105 L, 50 1.4
28-135 IS, 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS
Sigma 70mm EX DG Macro
Bogen 3211/488RC2 , Fastpack 350

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jo ­ Dilbeck
Junior Member
26 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Chico, CA
     
Jun 09, 2008 15:02 |  #9

I like the first one best. The first edit really takes away from the mood of the scene, the second edit seems to flatten everything.

Jo




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,746 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Before and after PP C&C please
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1857 guests, 157 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.