Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 27 May 2008 (Tuesday) 11:24
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How do I get it tack sharp?

 
betty1704
Member
154 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Johannesburg - South Africa
     
May 27, 2008 11:24 |  #1

I've been trying to take this pic and I cannot get everything in focus.
I've been trying a focal distance of 300mm. Should I rather try the wide angle lens and get really close.
I want a bit of shallow depth of field but I want the dad and kid thorns to be tack sharp.
Where am I going wrong?


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eddarr
There's Moderators under there....
Avatar
8,907 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Las Vegas
     
May 27, 2008 11:31 |  #2

Need a little more info. What was the aperture? At 300mm your DOF will be very small. Increasing to f/5.6 or f/8 will sharpen the background a little.

Take a look at this calculator. Enter your info and it will tell you what your depth of field will be.

http://www.dofmaster.c​om/dofjs.html (external link)


Eric

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
adsayer
Senior Member
Avatar
636 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: North Yorkshire/Surrey, UK
     
May 27, 2008 11:32 |  #3

firstly a few things there glare out at me when looking at your EXIF...

1/3 shutter speed on a 300mm length :eek: That must be one strudy tripod!

Secondly you have a 40D... use the live view feature and home in on the section you want to be razor sharp and focus manually until you nail it :D

ads


Takin' pictures n s**t, yo. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bildeb0rg
Goldmember
Avatar
3,880 posts
Gallery: 824 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 5024
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Perthshire in Scotland
     
May 27, 2008 11:32 |  #4

You can keep your 300mm focal length, just put the camera on a triopd, mirror lock up, self timer, stopped down to about f8




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eddarr
There's Moderators under there....
Avatar
8,907 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Las Vegas
     
May 27, 2008 11:56 |  #5

The area that is in focus is fairly sharp all things considered. The depth of field is just to small. The depth of field at 300mm and f/5.6 is less than 3/4 inch. Even at f/8.0 is is just over 1 inch.


Eric

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
oaktree
Goldmember
1,835 posts
Joined Mar 2007
     
May 27, 2008 12:19 |  #6

What lens are you shooting with? 75-300, 70-300, 70-300/DO, 300/2.8, 300/4?


Too much stuff, not enough shooting time.

Canon T4i (2 lenses), Fuji X100s, Olympus OM-D EM-1 (3 lenses)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hermeto
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,674 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
May 27, 2008 12:29 |  #7
bannedPermanent ban

eddarr wrote in post #5605238 (external link)
The area that is in focus is fairly sharp all things considered. The depth of field is just to small. The depth of field at 300mm and f/5.6 is less than 3/4 inch. Even at f/8.0 is is just over 1 inch.

eddarr, just out of curiosity, where do you pull these numbers from?
Where did you get f/5.6 or f/8, when the aperture used for this shot is exactly f/7.1, as shown in the EXIF?
How did you calculate DoF precisly down to 1 inch, when OP never mentioned the distance between camera and the subject?


What we see depends mainly on what we look for.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
May 27, 2008 13:26 |  #8

Hermeto wrote in post #5605406 (external link)
eddarr, just out of curiosity, where do you pull these numbers from?
Where did you get f/5.6 or f/8, when the aperture used for this shot is exactly f/7.1, as shown in the EXIF?
How did you calculate DoF precisly down to 1 inch, when OP never mentioned the distance between camera and the subject?

I was going to say the same thing. People quote thin DOF without knowing the distances between camera and subject. At higher distance DOF is quite large even at longer focal lengths.

OP - What lens? A lot depends on that also. Also I try higher shutter speeds. At your ss, you need very nice tripod, mirror lockup, remote and good long lens technique.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eddarr
There's Moderators under there....
Avatar
8,907 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Las Vegas
     
May 27, 2008 14:18 |  #9

I took a wild ass guess. Depending on the amount of cropping done to the image the field of view with 300mm would be 9" vertically and 6" horizontally at 10' from the subject (as found here (external link)). If 10' is reasonably close then at exactly f/7.1 the depth of field would be 1" (found here (external link)).

Based on the fact that the branch is reasonably sharp at the top and out of focus at the bottom it would be logical that the DOF is razor thin to begin with. It appears to me that the branch is leaning away from the camera or that the camera was not level when the image was taken.

I know I have made some assumptions and they may show my ignorance. But I would be willing to bet that I'm pretty close.


Eric

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
betty1704
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
154 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Johannesburg - South Africa
     
May 27, 2008 14:59 |  #10

Used 70-300mm lens on a tripod, manual mode, manual focus +/- 1.5 m distance. It was a cloudy day. The smaller thorn is slightly behind the big thorn but I wanted that angle, as it looks like the bigger thorn is "giving a mouthful" to the smaller thorn.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
betty1704
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
154 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Johannesburg - South Africa
     
May 27, 2008 15:03 |  #11

What if I use some sort of plain background behind the thorns and then use a smaller aperture?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,738 posts
Likes: 4072
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
May 27, 2008 15:07 |  #12

If your taking the pic tripod mounted and manual, why not stack the pics. Take 3 or 4 pics slightly adjusting the focus so that the first pic has the foremost thorn in perfect focus and the last pic has the farthest most thorn in focus and the two between about evenly spaced.

Then use a program like CombineZM to create a focus stack. You can get any DOF you'd like with little effort.
http://hadleyweb.pwp.b​lueyonder.co.uk/CZM/Ne​ws.htm (external link)


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
May 27, 2008 15:08 |  #13

Here is what I would do. Use AF, if you need to use MF, use the live view at 10x thing like someone mentioned above. Bump up ISO to get higher shutter speeds, 1/3sec is too slow even with tripod. I would try with ss of 1/500. Start with f8, but I would think you need to stop down more like f11, or even f16. What is the distance between subject and camera?


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
betty1704
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
154 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Johannesburg - South Africa
     
May 27, 2008 15:09 as a reply to  @ bobbyz's post |  #14

What is the distance between subject and camera?[/QUOTE]

+/- 1.2 m




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
betty1704
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
154 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Johannesburg - South Africa
     
May 27, 2008 15:12 |  #15

gjl711 wrote in post #5606351 (external link)
If your taking the pic tripod mounted and manual, why not stack the pics. Take 3 or 4 pics slightly adjusting the focus so that the first pic has the foremost thorn in perfect focus and the last pic has the farthest most thorn in focus and the two between about evenly spaced.

Then use a program like CombineZM to create a focus stack. You can get any DOF you'd like with little effort.
http://hadleyweb.pwp.b​lueyonder.co.uk/CZM/Ne​ws.htm (external link)

I actually did that. I'll try the CombineZM. Is it quite easy to do it?
I'm downloading it now.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,859 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
How do I get it tack sharp?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2753 guests, 161 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.