Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 27 May 2008 (Tuesday) 11:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What should I have done to make these better?

 
paulie8pointer
Senior Member
329 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Twin Lakes, Wisconsin
     
May 27, 2008 11:37 |  #1

IMAGE: http://img60.imageshack.us/img60/4656/img5340ec7.jpg


IMAGE: http://img58.imageshack.us/img58/1165/img5353lq7.jpg


IMAGE: http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/8553/img5355qm8.jpg
Thanks for any help you can give - Paulie

I hope when I die....My wife doesn't sell my toys for what I told her they cost!!:evil:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
May 27, 2008 22:18 |  #2

#'s 1 and 3 are exhibiting the interesting effect of foreshortening as a result of being taken with a very long lens (420mm and 640 mm equivalent focal lenths).

Only #2 has what is considered a "normal" appearance, and even that was 160 mm equivalent focal length, which is pretty long.

My personal opinion is that #2 is good composition for the situation. However, the use of the longer focal lengths for #'s 1 and 3 results in a rather "distorted" view of the scene. Such focal lengths have unquestioned validity in many nature shots where you are stalking birds and animals, but it looks a little freakish for this situation.


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

487 views & 0 likes for this thread, 2 members have posted to it.
What should I have done to make these better?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2790 guests, 163 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.