Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 27 May 2008 (Tuesday) 23:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

My absolutely unscientific comparison . . .

 
irishman
Goldmember
Avatar
4,098 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
     
May 27, 2008 23:50 |  #1

. . . between the large softbox included in the Elinchrom D-Lite 4 kit and the Lastolite Umbrella Box.

Build Quality

Neither can brag too much on build quality, but the Elinchrom boxes are superior (in the way that a 1981 Chevy Cavalier is "superior" to a 1979 Yugo). When the Lastolite bag is opened, the smell of dime store beach ball hits you, and it feels and looks cheap as well. The second time I opened the umbrella, one of the tips came off. I was able to put it back on, but it will never be on securely.

Ease of Use

The Lastolite hands down. The Elinchrom boxes are a strain to put together. I used curse words I didn't even know I knew putting the boxes together. If you can use an Umbrella, you can use the Lastolites (if you can't use an umbrella, you probably shouldn't have photography as a hobby!). You do have to pull the white diffuser towards the head of the D-Lite and then zip it around the light which can be a bit tricky, but nothing like putting those @%#**% boxes together! Also, when you put the umbrella shaft through the head, you have to force it a bit more than you might be comfortable doing.

Results

I tried to control the test as much as possible. Both shots were taken with the same exposure (/4.5@1/200 (INVALID EMAIL), ISO 100) and at the same distance. Both the model (my daughter) and I thought that the light was much brighter with the umbrella, but they metered out the same. The only PP'ing I did was a bit of healing stamp and a bit of a crop. That's it.

This is with the Elinchrom softbox:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


This is with the Lastolite Umbrella box:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


For some reason, the Elinchrom is a much warmer tone which I find more pleasing. I do like the catchlights of the umbrella better though (if I can think of it, I'll post a larger crop). I can warm the umbrella shot up in Photoshop. All in all I'd call it a push. The umbrellas are $67 at B&H, and I bought them for location use and larger group shots. Hope they do OK for that!

6D, G9, Sigma 50 1.4, Sigma 15mm Fisheye, Sigma 50 2.8 macro, Nikon 14-24G 2.8, Canon 16-35 2.8 II, Canon 24-105 f/4 IS, Canon 70-200 2.8 IS, tripod, lights, other stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
May 28, 2008 04:10 |  #2

Thanks for the comparison. The first photo's a stop less exposed than the first, until you get the brightness right you won't be able to judge color. It does look slightly bluer though. Make sure you set both to 5500K.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
May 28, 2008 06:58 |  #3

Lights and modifiers can both affect the color balance. This is sometimes important to be aware of if you're mixing brands and types, but otherwise it shouldn't be an issue if you're following proper white balance procedures with a good reference target.


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
irishman
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,098 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
     
May 28, 2008 07:18 |  #4

tim wrote in post #5609812 (external link)
Thanks for the comparison. The first photo's a stop less exposed than the first, until you get the brightness right you won't be able to judge color. It does look slightly bluer though. Make sure you set both to 5500K.

The camera was set to AWB on both shots.


6D, G9, Sigma 50 1.4, Sigma 15mm Fisheye, Sigma 50 2.8 macro, Nikon 14-24G 2.8, Canon 16-35 2.8 II, Canon 24-105 f/4 IS, Canon 70-200 2.8 IS, tripod, lights, other stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim ­ M
Goldmember
1,656 posts
Likes: 39
Joined Aug 2006
     
May 28, 2008 07:49 |  #5

tim wrote in post #5609812 (external link)
Thanks for the comparison. The first photo's a stop less exposed than the first, until you get the brightness right you won't be able to judge color. It does look slightly bluer though. Make sure you set both to 5500K.

Am I seeing the photos backwards? I see the box photo first and the umbrella photo second. I seem to have noticed this before, but this post reminded me of this issue.

It would make all the sense in the world that you are getting less light out of the umbrella box since you are getting no direct light on the face of it. I also understand the box that comes with the D-Lite kits has no internal diffuser, which would also soak up some light, but since it isn't there, makes the box brighter.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
May 28, 2008 15:38 |  #6

irishman wrote in post #5610295 (external link)
The camera was set to AWB on both shots.

If you shot RAW set the WB to 5500. If you shot JPG use a warming filter in PS. In future set the WB to flash on the camera before you start. AWB isn't that great unless you can fix in RAW later.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,272 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
My absolutely unscientific comparison . . .
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2816 guests, 173 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.