Alright, I just had a few test shots printed at CostCo and they look like crap. Can someone help me figure out what it is that I screwed up?
The process thus far:
- Buy monitor - Dell 2408WFP
- Buy calibrator - Pantone Huey Pro
- Use calibrator - Selected D65 and 2.2 gamma
- Checked calibration against a few "professional" images found here, looked fine.
- Took pictures in RAW
- Used ACR (16-bit sRGB) to import to PS CS3, tinkered with photo slightly
- Spot healed a couple blemishes and scuffs on a wall
- Reduced reflection from window behind shooter
- Cloned out a wire
- Added vignette
- Spot healed a couple blemishes and scuffs on a wall
- Downloaded printer/paper profile and installed on computer
- View > Proof Setup > Custom
- Device to simulate: Costco-PA-King of Prussia-Gls: 30-Apr-2008
- Preserve RGB numbers: Off
- Rendering Intent: Relative Colorimetric
- Black Point Compensation: On
- Simulate Paper Color: Off (tried on as well)
- Simulate Black Ink: Off (tried on as well)
- Device to simulate: Costco-PA-King of Prussia-Gls: 30-Apr-2008
- Checked for change, minor as expected
- Saved as PSD
- Flattened layers, converted to 8-bit color
- Save as JPG 12 for printing
It's worth mentioning that I did not take the photos to CostCo myself. The person who did claimed that the images looked almost identical on the kiosk as they did on my monitor and that she did not check any sort of "optimize my photos" option. She also said that the guy taking the prints out of the printer and stuffing them into envelopes didn't seem to be editing anything either (I believe her exact words were "he was having enough problems getting them into the envelopes"; CostCo hires a lot of elderly people).
What went wrong? Is my monitor calibration off? Does CostCo have some sort of "auto optimize" that runs regardless of whether you want it to?
I've attached a 1/4-size version of the file sent to printing (yeah, I know the editing isn't perfect, but I'm new to this).


