hi
i dont really do much landscape but did a few that i like c & c welcome thanks for looking
Canon400 Member 220 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: yorkshire uk More info | May 29, 2008 15:42 | #1 hi CANON 400D , CANON 20D EFS 17-85 IS EF 70 210 EF 50MM F1.8 380EX 17-135IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Randy1213 Goldmember 1,087 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2007 Location: San Francisco More info | May 29, 2008 16:03 | #2 Thanks for sharing these. Where were these pics taken, by the way? I like the scenery. As for C&C, here's what I have to offer: I think all of these pics are way over-saturated (or over HDR'd?), at least for my taste. They don't look natural to my eye. In addition, it also looks like you took them at mid-day and I would generally suggest you try to take landscapes at sunrise and sunset for best light -- perhaps those cliffs would show some nice soft light and more color at those times of day. I like the composition of the one of the river, because it gives the eye a place to go -- i.e., along the creek and toward the building (is that a mill?) at the back. Thanks again and keep posting. No-Excuses Kit: 1Ds Mk III, 1D Mk IV, 60D (IR Only). Lenses (all Canon): 16-35m f/2.8 L, 24-70mm f/2.8 L, 24-105mm f/4.0 L IS, 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS, 85 mm f/1.2 L MkII, 100mm f/2.8 macro, MP-E 65mm f/2.8 macro, 15mm f/2.8 fisheye. Support : Gitzo 3541L + RRS BH-55 LR Ballhead.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 29, 2008 16:26 | #3 hi thanks for the input these pics were taken in Kashmir NE Pakistan all i have done is added contrast and a bit of color in the sky CANON 400D , CANON 20D EFS 17-85 IS EF 70 210 EF 50MM F1.8 380EX 17-135IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 29, 2008 16:27 | #4 the second pic was here in uk CANON 400D , CANON 20D EFS 17-85 IS EF 70 210 EF 50MM F1.8 380EX 17-135IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 29, 2008 17:56 | #5 The added on sky doesn't work too well, it makes the pictures look unnatural. Photos from my travels
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Randy1213 Goldmember 1,087 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2007 Location: San Francisco More info | May 29, 2008 21:05 | #6 Canon400 wrote in post #5620547 hi thanks for the input these pics were taken in Kashmir NE Pakistan all i have done is added contrast and a bit of color in the sky Wow -- Kashmir. I'd sure like to see some more pics from there if you've got any. No-Excuses Kit: 1Ds Mk III, 1D Mk IV, 60D (IR Only). Lenses (all Canon): 16-35m f/2.8 L, 24-70mm f/2.8 L, 24-105mm f/4.0 L IS, 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS, 85 mm f/1.2 L MkII, 100mm f/2.8 macro, MP-E 65mm f/2.8 macro, 15mm f/2.8 fisheye. Support : Gitzo 3541L + RRS BH-55 LR Ballhead.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AiGTs Senior Member 535 posts Joined Oct 2006 More info | The sky is too saturated for my liking but nice lightings. 20D • 24 2.8 • 85 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
zucchini Goldmember 1,097 posts Joined Sep 2007 Location: Oregon More info | May 29, 2008 22:45 | #8 I am sorry but the bottom pic looks like a scene from the Telitubbies with that blue ski. Do you calibrate your monitor? They are good shots, they just look over processed. A Camera ~ A Lens ~ A Flash ~ A Tripod
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RoyWebber Goldmember 3,187 posts Likes: 7 Joined Nov 2006 Location: Corralejo, Fuerteventura....Canary Islands Spain More info | May 30, 2008 02:21 | #9 Good work, but the sky is very unatural Canon 7D, 40D,100-400 IS L, EFS 15-85 IS, EFS 10-22-With Faulty USM, 055XPROB+488RC2, 430 & 580 II Flash, Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HikinMike Walkin' Like a Penguin Now! More info | May 30, 2008 02:51 | #10 Way over-processed, sorry. Images in the Backcountry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kenyc Cream of the Crop More info | May 30, 2008 14:20 | #11 Oversaturated, particularly the first and last. Kenny A. Chaffin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
amckenzie4 Senior Member 516 posts Likes: 21 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Western Massachusetts, USA More info | May 30, 2008 15:16 | #12 I like the composition: there's something in each of them I like, especially #2. -Andy (Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 30, 2008 15:59 | #13 thanks to all for the input i am not good at PP after reading all the comments i had another go what do you this now do they look more natural or am i still crap at this many thanks. CANON 400D , CANON 20D EFS 17-85 IS EF 70 210 EF 50MM F1.8 380EX 17-135IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kenyc Cream of the Crop More info | May 30, 2008 16:02 | #14 Definitely much better for me. Kenny A. Chaffin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pandragon Senior Member 492 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Redmond, WA More info | May 30, 2008 18:17 | #15 curiousgeorge wrote in post #5621102 The added on sky doesn't work too well, it makes the pictures look unnatural. In terms of composition, the second works best. If you used a circular polariser, you may have reduced the reflections from the river, thus removing some of the highlights. I agree. Was it an overcast day or something that made you photoshop in a sky? Canon 30D :: Canon EF 17-40mm f/4 L :: Canon EF 70 - 200mm f/4 L IS :: Canon 300mm F4 L IS :: Giottos Lava Tripod with Ballhead
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Monkeytoes 1545 guests, 187 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||