Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 29 May 2008 (Thursday) 15:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

so what do you think about these then?

 
Canon400
Member
Avatar
220 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: yorkshire uk
     
May 29, 2008 15:42 |  #1

hi
i dont really do much landscape but did a few that i like c & c welcome thanks for looking

IMAGE: http://i275.photobucket.com/albums/jj289/lota420/2.jpg

IMAGE: http://i275.photobucket.com/albums/jj289/lota420/canal.jpg

IMAGE: http://i275.photobucket.com/albums/jj289/lota420/IMG_1783.jpg

IMAGE: http://i275.photobucket.com/albums/jj289/lota420/IMG_1807.jpg

CANON 400D , CANON 20D EFS 17-85 IS EF 70 210 EF 50MM F1.8 380EX 17-135IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Randy1213
Goldmember
Avatar
1,087 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2007
Location: San Francisco
     
May 29, 2008 16:03 |  #2

Thanks for sharing these. Where were these pics taken, by the way? I like the scenery. As for C&C, here's what I have to offer: I think all of these pics are way over-saturated (or over HDR'd?), at least for my taste. They don't look natural to my eye. In addition, it also looks like you took them at mid-day and I would generally suggest you try to take landscapes at sunrise and sunset for best light -- perhaps those cliffs would show some nice soft light and more color at those times of day. I like the composition of the one of the river, because it gives the eye a place to go -- i.e., along the creek and toward the building (is that a mill?) at the back. Thanks again and keep posting.


No-Excuses Kit: 1Ds Mk III, 1D Mk IV, 60D (IR Only). Lenses (all Canon): 16-35m f/2.8 L, 24-70mm f/2.8 L, 24-105mm f/4.0 L IS, 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS, 85 mm f/1.2 L MkII, 100mm f/2.8 macro, MP-E 65mm f/2.8 macro, 15mm f/2.8 fisheye. Support : Gitzo 3541L + RRS BH-55 LR Ballhead.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon400
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
220 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: yorkshire uk
     
May 29, 2008 16:26 |  #3

hi thanks for the input these pics were taken in Kashmir NE Pakistan all i have done is added contrast and a bit of color in the sky


CANON 400D , CANON 20D EFS 17-85 IS EF 70 210 EF 50MM F1.8 380EX 17-135IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon400
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
220 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: yorkshire uk
     
May 29, 2008 16:27 |  #4

the second pic was here in uk


CANON 400D , CANON 20D EFS 17-85 IS EF 70 210 EF 50MM F1.8 380EX 17-135IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
curiousgeorge
Goldmember
Avatar
3,920 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 213
Joined Feb 2006
Location: London
     
May 29, 2008 17:56 |  #5

The added on sky doesn't work too well, it makes the pictures look unnatural.

In terms of composition, the second works best. If you used a circular polariser, you may have reduced the reflections from the river, thus removing some of the highlights.


Photos from my travels (external link)
Canon EOS R6 MkII | Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L | Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L | Samyang 14mm f/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Randy1213
Goldmember
Avatar
1,087 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2007
Location: San Francisco
     
May 29, 2008 21:05 |  #6

Canon400 wrote in post #5620547 (external link)
hi thanks for the input these pics were taken in Kashmir NE Pakistan all i have done is added contrast and a bit of color in the sky

Wow -- Kashmir. I'd sure like to see some more pics from there if you've got any.


No-Excuses Kit: 1Ds Mk III, 1D Mk IV, 60D (IR Only). Lenses (all Canon): 16-35m f/2.8 L, 24-70mm f/2.8 L, 24-105mm f/4.0 L IS, 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS, 85 mm f/1.2 L MkII, 100mm f/2.8 macro, MP-E 65mm f/2.8 macro, 15mm f/2.8 fisheye. Support : Gitzo 3541L + RRS BH-55 LR Ballhead.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AiGTs
Senior Member
535 posts
Joined Oct 2006
     
May 29, 2008 22:35 as a reply to  @ Randy1213's post |  #7

The sky is too saturated for my liking but nice lightings.


20D 24 2.8 85 1.8
M8 35Lux 50Lux 50Nok

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zucchini
Goldmember
Avatar
1,097 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Oregon
     
May 29, 2008 22:45 |  #8

I am sorry but the bottom pic looks like a scene from the Telitubbies with that blue ski. Do you calibrate your monitor? They are good shots, they just look over processed.


A Camera ~ A Lens ~ A Flash ~ A Tripod

http://www.zandecki.ne​t (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roy ­ Webber
Goldmember
3,187 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Corralejo, Fuerteventura....Canary Islands Spain
     
May 30, 2008 02:21 |  #9

Good work, but the sky is very unatural


Canon 7D, 40D,100-400 IS L, EFS 15-85 IS, EFS 10-22-With Faulty USM, 055XPROB+488RC2, 430 & 580 II Flash, Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8-:cool:
Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hikin ­ Mike
Walkin' Like a Penguin Now!
Avatar
6,354 posts
Gallery: 16 photos
Likes: 354
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Atwater, CA
     
May 30, 2008 02:51 |  #10

Way over-processed, sorry.


Images in the Backcountry (external link)
Canon 5D 17-40 Ճ/4L 300 Ճ/4L IS 70-200 Ճ/4L 50 Ճ/1.8 1.4x TC Օ Kenko Ext. Tubes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kenyc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,810 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 360
Joined May 2005
Location: Denver, CO
     
May 30, 2008 14:20 |  #11

Oversaturated, particularly the first and last.

KAC


Kenny A. Chaffin
Art Page (external link) - Art Print Gallery (external link) - Blog (external link)
"Strive on with Awareness" - Siddhartha Gautama

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amckenzie4
Senior Member
Avatar
516 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Western Massachusetts, USA
     
May 30, 2008 15:16 |  #12

I like the composition: there's something in each of them I like, especially #2.

That said, I agree with the comments others have made about they sky; it may well have needed a little extra, but I think you overdid it. #3 is an exception -- I think it looks fine in that one.


-Andy (Flickr (external link))
Gear:
OM Systems OM-1, 12-40 f/2.8 PRO II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon400
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
220 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: yorkshire uk
     
May 30, 2008 15:59 |  #13

thanks to all for the input i am not good at PP after reading all the comments i had another go what do you this now do they look more natural or am i still crap at this many thanks.

IMAGE: http://i275.photobucket.com/albums/jj289/lota420/IMG_1783copy.jpg
IMAGE: http://i275.photobucket.com/albums/jj289/lota420/IMG_1807-1.jpg

CANON 400D , CANON 20D EFS 17-85 IS EF 70 210 EF 50MM F1.8 380EX 17-135IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kenyc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,810 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 360
Joined May 2005
Location: Denver, CO
     
May 30, 2008 16:02 |  #14

Definitely much better for me.

KAC


Kenny A. Chaffin
Art Page (external link) - Art Print Gallery (external link) - Blog (external link)
"Strive on with Awareness" - Siddhartha Gautama

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pandragon
Senior Member
Avatar
492 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Redmond, WA
     
May 30, 2008 18:17 |  #15

curiousgeorge wrote in post #5621102 (external link)
The added on sky doesn't work too well, it makes the pictures look unnatural.

In terms of composition, the second works best. If you used a circular polariser, you may have reduced the reflections from the river, thus removing some of the highlights.

I agree. Was it an overcast day or something that made you photoshop in a sky?


Canon 30D :: Canon EF 17-40mm f/4 L :: Canon EF 70 - 200mm f/4 L IS :: Canon 300mm F4 L IS :: Giottos Lava Tripod with Ballhead

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,866 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
so what do you think about these then?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1545 guests, 187 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.