Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 29 May 2008 (Thursday) 16:13
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Why spend money on Profoto vs Alien Bees?

 
M ­ Powered
Goldmember
Avatar
1,476 posts
Joined Oct 2007
     
May 29, 2008 16:13 |  #1

Okay, lets see if I don't get flamed off the board. I'm using cheapo Alien Bees and Photoflex strobes and softboxes, for my use they do a great job, especially with PW's.

Now question is why would I need to upgrade to Profoto's or Broncolor? Or any other high end strobe ?


Canon 5D Mark III | EF 24-70 f/ 2.8 L II

http://www.keslertran.​com (external link)
http://keslertran.tumb​lr.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Double ­ Negative
*sniffles*
Avatar
10,533 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New York, USA
     
May 29, 2008 16:17 |  #2

Quite honestly, AB mods kinda, well, suck. They're cheap. On the softboxes, for example, you can have hot spots (they don't have internal baffles/diffusers).

The AB strobes are actually pretty decent. They can however, be very inconsistent between pops at lowered power settings. You usually compete with the sun in your shots, so I assume near full power? Might only show itself in more controlled studio shots also...


La Vida Leica! (external link) LitPixel Galleries (external link) -- 1V-HS, 1D Mark IIn & 5D Mark IV w/BG-E20
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SooK
Member
109 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Belgium
     
May 29, 2008 16:18 |  #3

One of the reasons is that, if you are a pro and you travel a lot, you can rent them in almost every big city. So if you know how to handle them its a plus.

Some people like monolights, other likes the pack system.

Profoto has a lot of accesoires available for their lights, the zoom reflectors, the HUGE umbrellas, you name it.

I'm sure there are a lot other reasons that people buy them, but i would not suggest buying them if you dont spend at least 23hours a day with photography :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
M ­ Powered
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,476 posts
Joined Oct 2007
     
May 29, 2008 16:46 |  #4

SooK wrote in post #5620496 (external link)
One of the reasons is that, if you are a pro and you travel a lot, you can rent them in almost every big city. So if you know how to handle them its a plus.

Some people like monolights, other likes the pack system.

Profoto has a lot of accesoires available for their lights, the zoom reflectors, the HUGE umbrellas, you name it.

I'm sure there are a lot other reasons that people buy them, but i would not suggest buying them if you dont spend at least 23hours a day with photography :)

Accessories, the majority of accessories you can buy after market or on ebay. Unless you shoot film, I really can't see the cost justification.

In many respects I see this more of a "branded" thing. I wear Versace you wear Gap.

Like I'm looking at the portable battery pack from Broncolor, $2000-3000 !! Vagabond II unit 299.00 WTF !?

Does this industry look down on the professionals who use Alien Bees vs high end strobe names? Apparently they do.


Canon 5D Mark III | EF 24-70 f/ 2.8 L II

http://www.keslertran.​com (external link)
http://keslertran.tumb​lr.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Double ­ Negative
*sniffles*
Avatar
10,533 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New York, USA
     
May 29, 2008 16:53 |  #5

^ Well, to a point you get what you pay for. For day-in, day-out use the cheap stuff just doesn't hold up and/or give the best results. Of course there's brand markup, etc.


La Vida Leica! (external link) LitPixel Galleries (external link) -- 1V-HS, 1D Mark IIn & 5D Mark IV w/BG-E20
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
M ­ Powered
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,476 posts
Joined Oct 2007
     
May 29, 2008 16:57 |  #6

Double Negative wrote in post #5620701 (external link)
^ Well, to a point you get what you pay for. For day-in, day-out use the cheap stuff just doesn't hold up and/or give the best results. Of course there's brand markup, etc.

So far no complaints on durability of AB or photoflex, throw them on the sand, chuck it in the trunk, etc, etc holds up pretty well so far :)


Canon 5D Mark III | EF 24-70 f/ 2.8 L II

http://www.keslertran.​com (external link)
http://keslertran.tumb​lr.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
May 29, 2008 17:00 |  #7

Why do you have a 70-200 2.8 IS instead of 75-300ish.

The 75-300 is 250 bucks... and the L IS is 1.5 grand.

What's the reason? Both make a picture...

Why do pros choose canon with nikon over pentax, sony and olympus?

It's pretty much the same with profoto/broncolor. The light is better and they don't break as often... the system is better as well.


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
May 29, 2008 17:04 |  #8

M Powered wrote in post #5620722 (external link)
So far no complaints on durability of AB or photoflex, throw them on the sand, chuck it in the trunk, etc, etc holds up pretty well so far :)

Try firing them on full power every time right after they recharge for 2 hours in a row.

But if you like the bees - keep em and save yourself ten grand by not shooting bron.

Yet, there's are reasons why those stupid LA fashion photographers spend the extra money on the lights. There's a difference... you just might not perceive it until you shoot with them.

If you want to try, profotos are easy to rent. Broncolors are a tad more difficult, but you can still do it.


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JakPot
Senior Member
826 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: 80203
     
May 29, 2008 17:06 |  #9

Double Negative wrote in post #5620488 (external link)
Quite honestly, AB mods kinda, well, suck. They're cheap. On the softboxes, for example, you can have hot spots (they don't have internal baffles/diffusers).

my large AB foldable softbox does have an internal diffuser. Which softbox are you referring to?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
M ­ Powered
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,476 posts
Joined Oct 2007
     
May 29, 2008 17:19 |  #10

DocFrankenstein wrote in post #5620738 (external link)
Why do you have a 70-200 2.8 IS instead of 75-300ish.

The 75-300 is 250 bucks... and the L IS is 1.5 grand.

What's the reason? Both make a picture...

Why do pros choose canon with nikon over pentax, sony and olympus?

It's pretty much the same with profoto/broncolor. The light is better and they don't break as often... the system is better as well.

All of my beach shoots are done at full power, and last on average 4-6 hours. No problems yet (knock on wood)

Just because you spend more money on something doesn't mean it will perform better... Take my camera for an example :p AF issues which was recently resolved with the current firm ware release, almost a year later.

PS your lens analogy is not a good one :p


Canon 5D Mark III | EF 24-70 f/ 2.8 L II

http://www.keslertran.​com (external link)
http://keslertran.tumb​lr.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
M ­ Powered
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,476 posts
Joined Oct 2007
     
May 29, 2008 17:22 |  #11

DocFrankenstein wrote in post #5620755 (external link)
Try firing them on full power every time right after they recharge for 2 hours in a row.

But if you like the bees - keep em and save yourself ten grand by not shooting bron.

Yet, there's are reasons why those stupid LA fashion photographers spend the extra money on the lights. There's a difference... you just might not perceive it until you shoot with them.

If you want to try, profotos are easy to rent. Broncolors are a tad more difficult, but you can still do it.

Yea, most spend thousands of dollars on lights just to change the entire image in post. ;)


Canon 5D Mark III | EF 24-70 f/ 2.8 L II

http://www.keslertran.​com (external link)
http://keslertran.tumb​lr.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
May 29, 2008 18:30 |  #12

M Powered wrote in post #5620878 (external link)
PS your lens analogy is not a good one :p

That's what you think until you shoot enough with profoto.


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichNY
Goldmember
Avatar
1,817 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2006
     
May 29, 2008 19:11 |  #13

M Powered wrote in post #5620670 (external link)
Accessories, the majority of accessories you can buy after market or on ebay. Unless you shoot film, I really can't see the cost justification.

In many respects I see this more of a "branded" thing. I wear Versace you wear Gap.

Like I'm looking at the portable battery pack from Broncolor, $2000-3000 !! Vagabond II unit 299.00 WTF !?

Does this industry look down on the professionals who use Alien Bees vs high end strobe names? Apparently they do.

This isn't a branded thing- it is a quality and durability thing. The difference between Profoto and AB is on the same level as comparing your 1D Mark III to a Rebel XTi- sure they both take pictures but there is a major difference between them.

Compare the way Profoto accessories mount to strobes for example. Reflectors and speed rings can be adjusted by clamp forward or towards the rear of the strobe. I believe every other mfg. requires modifiers to be at a fixed distance from the tip of the lamp.

It just takes one day of using the two systems to get an understanding of the differences; to those who have never shot with a high end strobe it is going to be as difficult to appreciate as the finer features of a 1 series camera to a DSLR newbie.


Nikon D3, D300, 10.5 Fisheye, 35 f/1.4, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.4, Zeiss 100 f/2, 105 f/2.5, 200 f/4 Micro, 200 f/2, 300 f/2.8, 14-24, 24-70, 70-200, SB-800x4, SB-900, SU-800, (3) Sunpak 120J (2) Profoto Acute 2400s,Chimera softboxes, (4)PW Multimax, (6) C-stands, (3) Bogen Superbooms, Autopoles

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gryphonslair99
Senior Member
Avatar
491 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Wichita, Kansas
     
May 29, 2008 20:18 |  #14

M Powered wrote in post #5620467 (external link)
Okay, lets see if I don't get flamed off the board. I'm using cheapo Alien Bees and Photoflex strobes and softboxes, for my use they do a great job, especially with PW's.

Now question is why would I need to upgrade to Profoto's or Broncolor? Or any other high end strobe ?

Use them 4-6 hours a day 4-5 days a week for 25 years then call me and tell me how they held up. If you are not shooting on that schedule and they do the job then do you need to upgrade? That one you have to answer.


You don't take a photograph. You ask, quietly, to borrow it.
_______________
Gear List
https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=1193134&pos​tcount=237

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
M ­ Powered
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,476 posts
Joined Oct 2007
     
May 29, 2008 21:57 |  #15

gryphonslair99 wrote in post #5621887 (external link)
Use them 4-6 hours a day 4-5 days a week for 25 years then call me and tell me how they held up. If you are not shooting on that schedule and they do the job then do you need to upgrade? That one you have to answer.

So Profoto are like Mowen Faucets? Buy it for looks, buy it for life ;)


Canon 5D Mark III | EF 24-70 f/ 2.8 L II

http://www.keslertran.​com (external link)
http://keslertran.tumb​lr.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

21,297 views & 0 likes for this thread, 34 members have posted to it.
Why spend money on Profoto vs Alien Bees?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2674 guests, 164 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.