Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 29 May 2008 (Thursday) 16:13
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Why spend money on Profoto vs Alien Bees?

 
slivr
Senior Member
Avatar
627 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Reno / Lake Tahoe - Nevada, USA
     
May 31, 2008 13:12 |  #106

Robert -
UPDATE: Oops - with all the talk of Alien Bees earlier in this thread, I addressed a remote for them. Sorry, Robert - I know you're not shooting those. My mistake.

Original Post: I thought this new remote by Alien Bees allowed you to control from your camera? I know it uses a 4-wire telco cord to connect everything together causing a bit of a problem, but I would think it's better than climbing the ladder or bringing AB heads down to adjust them. http://www.alienbees.c​om/wired.html (external link)


- Jason S.
More gear and money than talent ... but workin' at it!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
M ­ Powered
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,476 posts
Joined Oct 2007
     
May 31, 2008 13:14 |  #107

TMR Design wrote in post #5631450 (external link)
How do you handle power level changes when your monolight is 10 feet up in the air and positioned. I'm looking for good alternatives that give me power as well as remote capability.

I've owned AB strobes and have had first hand experience with the LG-4X. Honestly, it's a piece of garbage and the throw of the slider is only about 2/3 that of an actual Bee, so the power control is about as coarse as you can get. If you're using it below 1/4 power it may as well be an on/off switch.

I know that Elinchrom Skyport transmitter will talk to Style RX strobes as well as an IR remote for power control and I know Hensel has a wireless remote. Other than going pack and head what are the alternatives for remote (or at least ground level) control?

I'm seriously considering Dyna-Lite monolights because of the quality, build and analog circuitry to really maximize power from the V2, but I don't see a remote capability.

Haven't ran into any situations (yet) where my strobes are 10 ft in the air. If I did, I would just go through the tedius process of lowering them to make the adjustments :( - I don't care if the process is tedius as long as I get the shot that I want.


Canon 5D Mark III | EF 24-70 f/ 2.8 L II

http://www.keslertran.​com (external link)
http://keslertran.tumb​lr.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
M ­ Powered
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,476 posts
Joined Oct 2007
     
May 31, 2008 13:16 |  #108

slivr wrote in post #5631477 (external link)
Robert -
I thought this new remote by Alien Bees allowed you to control from your camera? I know it uses a 4-wire telco cord to connect everything together causing a bit of a problem, but I would think it's better than climbing the ladder or bringing AB heads down to adjust them.

http://www.alienbees.c​om/wired.html (external link)

Man, photographers are getting lazy! First zoom lenses for convenience, now Remotes for power changes... pretty soon we'll wire our cameras to a tripod that has a gryo that controls movement and we'll wirelessly take pictures at home in bed. :p


Canon 5D Mark III | EF 24-70 f/ 2.8 L II

http://www.keslertran.​com (external link)
http://keslertran.tumb​lr.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hermes
Goldmember
2,375 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: London, UK
     
May 31, 2008 13:41 |  #109

It's not about laziness as much as it's about speed, which means time saved, which means faster turnover which means money and satisfied clients.

If you're not in the situation where the above matters a lot to you then I really don't see you needing Brons/Profotos or remote adjustment, although the latter is just one of many benefits of the Elinchrom RXs




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Yohan ­ Pamudji
Goldmember
Avatar
2,994 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Mississippi
     
May 31, 2008 13:47 |  #110

slivr wrote in post #5631477 (external link)
Robert -
I thought this new remote by Alien Bees allowed you to control from your camera? I know it uses a 4-wire telco cord to connect everything together causing a bit of a problem, but I would think it's better than climbing the ladder or bringing AB heads down to adjust them.

http://www.alienbees.c​om/wired.html (external link)

That's not new. I've used that with my WLs for 3 years. Very nice to be able to adjust everything from near the camera--much quicker than getting out the step ladder and adjusting each strobe one by one. The extra cables aren't a problem since there are power cables going all over the place anyway with 3-4 strobes in use.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichNY
Goldmember
Avatar
1,817 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2006
     
May 31, 2008 13:55 |  #111

DocFrankenstein wrote in post #5631230 (external link)
Powerpacks are the reason to go profoto... their monolights have issues and chromes are better, generally.

While most of Profoto's business is power pack based I've never heard any issue whatsoever with their monolights. Can you please provide a link to where you have heard about this?

Q. What do you mean by chromes are better?


Nikon D3, D300, 10.5 Fisheye, 35 f/1.4, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.4, Zeiss 100 f/2, 105 f/2.5, 200 f/4 Micro, 200 f/2, 300 f/2.8, 14-24, 24-70, 70-200, SB-800x4, SB-900, SU-800, (3) Sunpak 120J (2) Profoto Acute 2400s,Chimera softboxes, (4)PW Multimax, (6) C-stands, (3) Bogen Superbooms, Autopoles

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
May 31, 2008 13:58 as a reply to  @ Hermes's post |  #112

It has nothing to do with laziness. If I were lazy I would not be rolling in a cart with cases, sandbags, tool booxes, stands, a V2, etc. and I wouldn't be so willing to set up, breakdown, move to a new location and do that 4 times in a day.

I don't use an assistant and everything is on me during a shoot. I move quickly and hate wasting time or making a model wait on me. I believe that the technical aspects of a shoot should be transparent to a model or art director and there should be a flow to the shoot.

If I was doing family portraits in my back yard it wouldn't matter but with clients and in the interest of creativity, being able to change not only position of a light but also power level allows me to work more efficiently and to make changes on the fly rather than being locked in to any one setup or taking aperture.

The same thing applies when I'm in the studio. If my main light is 8 feet in the air and my hair light is 8 feet in the air then I now have 2 strobes that I have to either lower and raise or I'm up and down on a step ladder.. and the step ladder doesn't even help when there's a strip light over my subject, mounted to a boom and coming from 6 feet off to the side. That strobe has its controls literally facing the ceiling so you can't just climb a ladder to make the adjustment.

I look for the tools that will make my job easier, not those that allow me to be lazy.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichNY
Goldmember
Avatar
1,817 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2006
     
May 31, 2008 13:59 |  #113

M Powered wrote in post #5631484 (external link)
I don't care if the process is tedius as long as I get the shot that I want.

Then save your money, keep your ABs setting a CWB whenever you change power an make any adjustments in PP.


Nikon D3, D300, 10.5 Fisheye, 35 f/1.4, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.4, Zeiss 100 f/2, 105 f/2.5, 200 f/4 Micro, 200 f/2, 300 f/2.8, 14-24, 24-70, 70-200, SB-800x4, SB-900, SU-800, (3) Sunpak 120J (2) Profoto Acute 2400s,Chimera softboxes, (4)PW Multimax, (6) C-stands, (3) Bogen Superbooms, Autopoles

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
M ­ Powered
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,476 posts
Joined Oct 2007
     
May 31, 2008 14:07 |  #114

RichNY wrote in post #5631638 (external link)
While most of Profoto's business is power pack based I've never heard any issue whatsoever with their monolights. Can you please provide a link to where you have heard about this?

Q. What do you mean by chromes are better?

Yea I want to know! Their 1200ws monostrobe light is priced very attractively. I don't mind spending 1000k for a 1200ws monolight. The WL 1300 cost about 700 bucks, I don't mind spending the extra for a much better light.


Canon 5D Mark III | EF 24-70 f/ 2.8 L II

http://www.keslertran.​com (external link)
http://keslertran.tumb​lr.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tareq
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,984 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 552
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
May 31, 2008 14:10 as a reply to  @ M Powered's post |  #115

CALM DOWN PEOPLE!

To the OP, why you didn't ask about Bronocolor or Elinchrom vs. AB? why not Bronocolor vs. Profoto?

Now i don't use Profto and i think many in middle east don't have Profoto, so why you just stated Profoto vs. AB? We don't have ABs here as well, so what we can do then?


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichNY
Goldmember
Avatar
1,817 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2006
     
May 31, 2008 14:12 |  #116

M Powered wrote in post #5631683 (external link)
Yea I want to know! Their 1200ws monostrobe light is priced very attractively. I don't mind spending 1000k for a 1200ws monolight. The WL 1300 cost about 700 bucks, I don't mind spending the extra for a much better light.

Personally I'd get a light meter before upgrading your strobes.

1200ws is a lot of light. If you want to shoot at lower f/stops then you may very well find yourself in situations where you have too much light and where moving the strobes further away will change the quality of the light. I'm not suggesting that 1200 watts will be too much for your application but if you find yourself wanting to shoot indoors in a smaller area you will have a lot more DOF than you anticipate unless you start using ND filters on your lens, etc.


Nikon D3, D300, 10.5 Fisheye, 35 f/1.4, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.4, Zeiss 100 f/2, 105 f/2.5, 200 f/4 Micro, 200 f/2, 300 f/2.8, 14-24, 24-70, 70-200, SB-800x4, SB-900, SU-800, (3) Sunpak 120J (2) Profoto Acute 2400s,Chimera softboxes, (4)PW Multimax, (6) C-stands, (3) Bogen Superbooms, Autopoles

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichNY
Goldmember
Avatar
1,817 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2006
     
May 31, 2008 14:17 |  #117

Tareq wrote in post #5631695 (external link)
CALM DOWN PEOPLE!

To the OP, why you didn't ask about Bronocolor or Elinchrom vs. AB? why not Bronocolor vs. Profoto?

Now i don't use Profto and i think many in middle east don't have Profoto, so why you just stated Profoto vs. AB? We don't have ABs here as well, so what we can do then?

Other brands such as Bron, Elinchrom, Dyna-Lite, and Hensel were all presented early on in this thread. https://photography-on-the.net …hp?p=5622481&po​stcount=16

If you are living in the middle east not having Profoto and ABs is the least of your problems ;)


Nikon D3, D300, 10.5 Fisheye, 35 f/1.4, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.4, Zeiss 100 f/2, 105 f/2.5, 200 f/4 Micro, 200 f/2, 300 f/2.8, 14-24, 24-70, 70-200, SB-800x4, SB-900, SU-800, (3) Sunpak 120J (2) Profoto Acute 2400s,Chimera softboxes, (4)PW Multimax, (6) C-stands, (3) Bogen Superbooms, Autopoles

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tareq
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,984 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 552
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
May 31, 2008 14:25 |  #118

RichNY wrote in post #5631730 (external link)
Other brands such as Bron, Elinchrom, Dyna-Lite, and Hensel were all presented early on in this thread. https://photography-on-the.net …hp?p=5622481&po​stcount=16

If you are living in the middle east not having Profoto and ABs is the least of your problems ;)

Great, i will read that thread, thanks :)

And what do you mean by your last statement? ;)


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
flipstyle72
Goldmember
2,318 posts
Joined Dec 2007
     
May 31, 2008 14:35 |  #119
bannedPermanent ban

haha...sounds to me that those who buy the really expensive stuff more or less try to justify and convince themselves by "overly" bad talking the cheaper stuff. Then mentality goes with ALL aspects of life purchases by EVERYONE.

There are solid points on both sides of the argument...

I don't care what people say, MP posted some shots in here that almost everyone would love to have taken shots like.

Me...i buy the cheap stuff cuz this is more fun than a living... ;-)a. And when I DO create stunning shots, It's cooler to say you did it with cheap stuff.

One of the most complimented images I have from joe on the street to the more professional shooters was taken with an XT, 80dollar lens and 50dollar ebay strobes. lol.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
May 31, 2008 14:46 |  #120

RichNY wrote in post #5631638 (external link)
While most of Profoto's business is power pack based I've never heard any issue whatsoever with their monolights. Can you please provide a link to where you have heard about this?

Q. What do you mean by chromes are better?

I find Elinchromes more convenient, hence better.

Profotos monopacks have issues if you get the radio PW version. Sometimes they don't trigger. And I've had one rental unit that blew a fuse every time I've shot it at less than max output. My friend had to return his 1200 monolight twice, cause it just died.

1200 wattseconds is "a lot" only if you shoot in a small studio and can't adjust the power. I've shot with a 2400 ws non-adjustable powerpack for a while and the only problem I had was getting an f/45 for a headshot when you're shooting through doubly diffused panel. :) Had I had even a two-stop adjustment, I'd simply stop down two stops and have no problems at f/22


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

21,302 views & 0 likes for this thread, 34 members have posted to it.
Why spend money on Profoto vs Alien Bees?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2841 guests, 167 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.