RichNY wrote in post #5626594
Personally I don't buy into your cost justification argument. If you can cost justify a pair of 5Ds, a 70-200 f/2.8, an 85 f/1.2, and a 35 L for your work you certainly can cost justify another $1k more for professional lights. I'm not attacking your kit or suggesting that they don't meet your needs, but if you need that type of camera and gear for your work I don't think the cost justification argument holds up. If don't consider your work high end commercial then you might as well be shooting it with Rebel or 20D and consumer glass.
Here's the thing - I'm not lighting weddings from start to finish like a commercial job. It's not even in the same universe as doing a commercial shoot where you have to plan out all your shots and bring along a grip truck and a bunch of PA's to set up / strike the gear, and the talent is making $18k just to be there for a day. If I was doing primarily commercial, I could buy the pro kit, but it doesn't mean I wouldn't still break out the bees for simpler jobs. If I need it, I can rent a kit for the weekend from my local Calumet.
Another $1k for more professional lights? To swap what I own in PCB gear out with Profoto packs/heads would cost me at least 7K if I skimp on modifiers. It has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not I consider my work high-end or low-end, it has to do with what my needs are. My needs for off camera lighting are fairly simple- I can usually get away with a single head and a medium softbox, so why I'd want to overspend by 7X to get that makes no sense to me. I'm not shooting a high-end clothing catalog where color accuracey from every firing of the flash has to be perfect. I'd rather make my car payment this month.
The analogy to bodies/lenses doesn't hold up - an AB800 w/ a medium softbox does the same thing a profoto head does - it lights my subject. Maybe not with as convenient controls or as beautiful fit and finish, but it does it well enough at a much lower cost. A consumer lens, let's say an f4-5.6 zoom is not going to allow me to create shots like the 35L does. The 85 f1.2 is my favorite, but the 85 f1.8 would probably be fine 75% the time.
How do you even select a focus point on the fly with a Rebel? I know people shoot weddings with them sometimes, but I wonder how they do it. 20D's are okay, I had one a few years ago. I prefer the perspective on the FF body and the larger pentaprism makes it easier to see what the heck I'm doing. The files are still great, so they justify themselves in my book - and since it's my company, I get to make the call. It's not worth the dough to everybody, I know.
Anyway...I get what you're trying to say, but I have to say from my experience, lots of high-end wedding shooters don't even go so far as to fuss with anything other than speelights. I don't know of any high-end quality shooters that are using consumer glass, except for maybe the 50 f1.4 or the 85 f1.8.
Cheers