Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 31 May 2008 (Saturday) 12:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Which is more important? A ND filter or a Graduated filter?

 
lsquare
Goldmember
1,933 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2008
     
May 31, 2008 12:01 |  #1

Right now I think a GD Filter would be more important especially when I'm in really contrasty situations where the top of the picture would be really bright in relations to the rest of the picture (i.e. landscape and cityscapes where the sky is white). What do you guys think? I've been taking a lot of pictures in HK, but most of the images seem to have blown skies. I think a GD filter wil solve it, but before I buy it, I need some input from you guys. I don't know how a ND filter will handle the situation anymore different from the GD filter.

Btw, I shoot landscape and cityscape pictures.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KenG
Senior Member
Avatar
531 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
     
May 31, 2008 12:13 |  #2

A graduated ND filter would certainly help you. But you could also bracket exposures and blend them afterwords as well.

A solid Neutral Density filter will not help in this situation, as it is designed to allow longer exposures, by decreasing light. But it is a filter that really can't be replicated in photoshop. Where the Graduated can be reproduced in photoshop.

Although there are two divided camps as to which way to go the filter method or the PP method.


Ken
My Web Gallery... kengillespie.com (external link)
Photo Blog... Ken Gillespie's Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DigitalRelish
Hatchling
6 posts
Joined May 2008
     
May 31, 2008 20:47 |  #3

I'd agree with the GD filter, but If you're shooting mostly static then I'd also suggest having a look at using HDR techniques. Here are some HDR shots of HK (external link).


Will
Liverpool Photographer (external link) - My flickr photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
May 31, 2008 20:55 |  #4

I'd pick a grad ND if I were shooting canon. All canons allow shutter speeds of at least 1/4000th of a second. There's rarely a reason to use an ND unless you want to shoot sub f/2.8 in the sun.

I can't agree that you can photoshop an ND filter.


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
argyle
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,187 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
     
Jun 01, 2008 06:49 as a reply to  @ DocFrankenstein's post |  #5

The ND will simply reduce the amount of light that reaches the sensor over the entire image...it won't be of any help in this instance. For what you're trying to accomplish, a GND will be your friend. As someone else has said (since you'll be armed with your new tripod), another option is to set up and take multiple exposures for blending later. Or, even better if possible, pick a different time of day to shoot (although not always feasible). Also, set your camera's histogram to display in RGB mode and keep your eye on the blue channel...you'll see if you're blowing things out. If your blue channel is pegged to the right, dial in a little negative exposure compensation to drive it back to the left a little bit.


"Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer

GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,248 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Which is more important? A ND filter or a Graduated filter?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2531 guests, 170 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.