Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 31 May 2008 (Saturday) 16:49
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Old wine

 
betty1704
Member
154 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Johannesburg - South Africa
     
May 31, 2008 16:49 |  #1

I love this pic I took of a very old wine bottle in my wine cellar.
Any flaws?
By the way, I love the "feeling" of a slightly underexposed picture.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
May 31, 2008 21:19 |  #2

:rolleyes:Well, it's so underexposed that it isn't showing up at all here:rolleyes:


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
betty1704
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
154 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Johannesburg - South Africa
     
Jun 01, 2008 10:23 |  #3

Sorry about the attachment...oops!
Comments and critiques please!


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Randy1213
Goldmember
Avatar
1,087 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2007
Location: San Francisco
     
Jun 01, 2008 10:32 as a reply to  @ betty1704's post |  #4

I generally prefer pics on the slightly underexposed side, too. But for me this one is too underexposed. I'd like to see more detail on the top of the label. Along those same lines, seems like it would've helped to stop down the aperture a bit to get more depth of field so you can see the shoulder of the bottle . And the part in focus, at the very top of the cork, still looks a bit soft, as if you shot this in low light without a tripod and no flash.

By the way, how was the wine?


No-Excuses Kit: 1Ds Mk III, 1D Mk IV, 60D (IR Only). Lenses (all Canon): 16-35m f/2.8 L, 24-70mm f/2.8 L, 24-105mm f/4.0 L IS, 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS, 85 mm f/1.2 L MkII, 100mm f/2.8 macro, MP-E 65mm f/2.8 macro, 15mm f/2.8 fisheye. Support : Gitzo 3541L + RRS BH-55 LR Ballhead.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
betty1704
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
154 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Johannesburg - South Africa
     
Jun 01, 2008 10:52 |  #5

Randy1213 wrote in post #5636275 (external link)
I generally prefer pics on the slightly underexposed side, too. But for me this one is too underexposed. I'd like to see more detail on the top of the label. Along those same lines, seems like it would've helped to stop down the aperture a bit to get more depth of field so you can see the shoulder of the bottle . And the part in focus, at the very top of the cork, still looks a bit soft, as if you shot this in low light without a tripod and no flash.

By the way, how was the wine?

I think that wine is undrinkable by now...but it does look good in the wine cellar.
I did take another two, that I merged to get some detail on the label. The bottle is also very dusty (they look nice dusty in the wine cellar) hence the soft look on the shoulder, I guess.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Randy1213
Goldmember
Avatar
1,087 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2007
Location: San Francisco
     
Jun 01, 2008 11:08 as a reply to  @ betty1704's post |  #6

It would be great to have that same detail but with the composition like the first one -- I like the top of the cork coming at you. But I think your second shot shows more of the dustiness because you got the shoulder. And, as I suspected, shooting the shoulder added a little reflected light which added some interest to the pic for me. Hope this wasn't an expensive bottle.


No-Excuses Kit: 1Ds Mk III, 1D Mk IV, 60D (IR Only). Lenses (all Canon): 16-35m f/2.8 L, 24-70mm f/2.8 L, 24-105mm f/4.0 L IS, 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS, 85 mm f/1.2 L MkII, 100mm f/2.8 macro, MP-E 65mm f/2.8 macro, 15mm f/2.8 fisheye. Support : Gitzo 3541L + RRS BH-55 LR Ballhead.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
betty1704
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
154 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Johannesburg - South Africa
     
Jun 01, 2008 11:24 |  #7

Thanks.
I also prefer the first composition. I'll try taking another two of the first composition and then merging. I'll rather have a shallow depth of field in both (one focusing the cork and the other the label) to avoid cloning out unwanted and distracting background details.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
richardyoung
Goldmember
1,679 posts
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1509
Joined Oct 2002
Location: Vegas
     
Jun 01, 2008 17:41 |  #8

HAHAHA

Robert_Lay wrote in post #5633551 (external link)
:rolleyes:Well, it's so underexposed that it isn't showing up at all here:rolleyes:


The Art of Erotica • In Vegas - Lets Meet (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

842 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Old wine
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2790 guests, 163 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.