Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
Thread started 31 May 2008 (Saturday) 22:34
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Bokeh from A5xx?

 
NYC2SOCAL
Member
207 posts
Joined May 2008
     
May 31, 2008 22:34 |  #1

So I gave my neighbors some pictures I had taken at a party with my XTI (f2.8 iso100 shots). They loved the bokeh produced by the shallow depth of field. I saw they had an A520, and told them they could probably do the same. I took the camera, set it to f2.6 and took a couple of shots. The DOF was a lot more than I expected... I was actually quite disappointed. It appears that the f2.6 produced a DOF of 5 feet or so.

Is this how the A5xx's are? Can people show me what their A5xx can do with bokeh? Am I asking too much of this P&S? I was actually thinking of getting an A590IS, but now, I'm not so sure..




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Jun 01, 2008 07:23 |  #2

You're expecting too much. Shallow DoF is a function of subject distance, aperture, and focal length. The shorter the lens, the greater the DoF. There's an on-line DoF calculator here (external link). Since the actual focal lengths of the PowerShots and other digital point and shoot cameras are so short, you need to really work to get a shallow DoF, or even an OOF background. The A520, at its widest (5.8 mm) setting and f/2.8 has a DoF from about 5 ft. to infinity when focused at 10 ft. At its longest (23.2 mm) zoom and f/5.5 (max. aperture at 23.2 mm) and 10 ft., the DoF is about 3.5 ft.

Note that Bokeh isn't synonymous with DoF; it's actually a subjective judgement of the quality or smoothness of the OOF areas, and varies from lens design to lens design at the same aperture and focal length.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NYC2SOCAL
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
207 posts
Joined May 2008
     
Jun 01, 2008 12:41 as a reply to  @ Jon's post |  #3

AWESOME response Jon!! Thanks! I just started getting into DSLR, and just assumed the DOF was attributed solely to the aperture. Thanks for the clarification! I guess maybe I should take a class or maybe read more! Or what I've been doing (shooting more) :lol:

I actually took the picture at 5.8mm @ f2.6 which according to the calculator says the DOF of 2.24-4.55ft.. I'm actually surprised I was accurate in my visual measurement of 5ft.. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
low ­ orbit
Goldmember
Avatar
1,730 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Christchurch, NZ
     
Jun 01, 2008 13:38 |  #4

Yes, what Jon said.

There are ways around this for P+S cameras but it basically involves taking shots on the macro setting and cropping right in which limits your freedom. You can also separate the subject from the background by several feet (20 or 30 or more sort of thing), go to the longest setting (tele end) and the widest aperture you have. Again, this is just a workaround and even the most basic of DSLRs will romp all over this.

Cheers.


Shoot as if it were film

Find my photographs here - updated June 2014 (external link)
GKPE Chatter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,253 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Bokeh from A5xx?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2200 guests, 128 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.