IndyJeff wrote:
Why does everyone who buys a DSLR and has no knowledge of APT and shutter speed want to buy a book to explain it? Look, there is probably a setting on your camera called PROGRAM. The camera will meter the available light and set the camera automatically for the best exposure. Use that PROGRAM setting and learn from it.
Get yourself to a place where you can shoot some shots, take a shot on P and observe what the camera had for the best exposure. Now switch to AV and shoot with different settings, taking notes on each exposure. Switch to TV and do the same thing. Now go home, fire up the ol' PC insert the card into the card reader and look at what you did. Read the notes you took and see how the image changed from shot to shot. See what happened when you opened the APT up and the shutter speed went up? See what happened when you decreased the APT and the shutter slowed down?
Now go to the library and get a book about photography and read about exposures. You will have a better understanding of what your reading and be able to apply that the next time out in the field.
Don't be afriad of using the P mode to get a better understanding of how your camera works. When you started driving you didn't start doing power slides thur a 90 degree turn the first week did you? No, you learned how the car handled first then experimented as you would slide around that turn, right? Increasing your speed as your ability to handle the car increased with experience each time out seemed logical and the safe way to get that slide done.
Indy:
That's certainly one way to learn. Another way is to get a book about it. One flaw I see with the "jump into 'P-mode' " is that if the person doesn't understand the basics of exposure control, they aren't going to understand what is going on in 'p-mode.' To continue your racing analogy...
In racing school, if you are learning to drive a car without a syncromesh transmission, they teach you how to up-shift and down-shift BEFORE you learn the racing line for the track. It would do one little good to drive around the track in an automatic transmission car learning the racing line without getting a sense of where the shift points are if you then had to learn how to shift the car.
I did some local club racing a few years back. After going to an orientation session for the club, I read a couple of books on driving technique and how to determine the best racing line on a track. I took top spot in my first event and went on to win 3 club championships. The guy I beat those 3 years had been club champ the previous 3 years running, and never read a racing book in his life. It just goes to show that different people learn in different ways. My guess is that people who ask about books learn well from books.
I can't imagine that building an initial, conceptual understanding of exposure via book learning would get in the way of what is to be learned by doing.