Hi, I'm not a professional photographer but I was just wondering why the below photo which was taken with a flash have several "orbs" scattered over the image (sorry for not having a larger picture).
Thanks
Hajk Hatchling 2 posts Joined Jun 2008 More info | Jun 03, 2008 16:06 | #1 Hi, I'm not a professional photographer but I was just wondering why the below photo which was taken with a flash have several "orbs" scattered over the image (sorry for not having a larger picture).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mike ugly when I'm sober More info | Jun 03, 2008 16:42 | #2 Thode 'disks' are instances of what is commonly known as 'lens fare'. Lens flare is caused by stray light entering the lens - the photo is of a caving expedition? The front of the lens may have had dust or (more likely) droplets of water on it which has caused the light to flare in that manner. www.mikegreenphotography.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OdiN1701 Goldmember 2,523 posts Joined Jul 2005 More info | Jun 03, 2008 16:44 | #3 Permanent banLooks like you've found some ghosts. SAY NO TO SPEC WORK!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
20droger Cream of the Crop 14,685 posts Likes: 27 Joined Dec 2006 More info | "Orbs" it is! Magical mystery creatures caused by out-of-focus dust brightly lit by the flash. These are most often invisible specks floating in the air, rather than specks on the lens itself. They are close to the camera, and therefore very brightly lit by flash set for proper exposure of a more distant object. The brightness of the specks is a result of the fact that the light from a flash falls off as the square of the distance, in both directions!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
iamaelephant Senior Member 336 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: New Zealand More info | Jun 03, 2008 17:15 | #5
-- Martin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rdenney Rick "who is not suited for any one title" Denney 2,400 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jun 2003 More info | Jun 03, 2008 17:32 | #6 Always, always, always use an effective lens shade when using a flash. The flash must never illuminate the front of the lens. Even if the lens had water drops on it (which I agree is probably the issue here), you would not have seen them if they were shaded from the flash.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
20droger Cream of the Crop 14,685 posts Likes: 27 Joined Dec 2006 More info | Oh, yes! That reminds me! Be careful not to get slimed while capturing orbs!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jon Cream of the Crop 69,628 posts Likes: 227 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bethesda, MD USA More info | Jun 03, 2008 18:02 | #8 It's more likely dust or other particles in the air than on the lens. A hood won't help with that. The bigger the spots the closer they are to the lens. Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kniteshade Member 45 posts Joined Oct 2007 More info | Given the rocks and head-lamp on the guy, I'm guessing it may have been taken in some kind of cave or mine. I imagine its moisture on the lens due to the excessive humidity 400D+grip / Tamron 17-50 f2.8 / 50 f1.4 / 18-55 Kit / 75-300 Kit
LOG IN TO REPLY |
20droger Cream of the Crop 14,685 posts Likes: 27 Joined Dec 2006 More info | Orbs are a common and well-researched phenomenon.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wow thanks for all the great answers.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
20droger Cream of the Crop 14,685 posts Likes: 27 Joined Dec 2006 More info | They have diffraction rings because the dust or moisture particles are so small. Their size produces standing waves, which interract to produce the rings.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ovjamaica Member 52 posts Joined Apr 2008 More info | 20droger is absolutely right. These are just "orbs" caused by dust or moisture in the air. I work at a theater that many claim to be haunted, and "ghost hunters" have come in and gotten pictures of these mystical "orbs". But, like 20droger said, it's easy to reproduce and thus discredit the "ghost" connection.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
20droger Cream of the Crop 14,685 posts Likes: 27 Joined Dec 2006 More info | Actually, they work fine in the film world, but only with cheap cameras with close-to-the-lens in-camera flash. Moving the flash away from the line of sight, even by using an on-shoe flash, increases the distance from the lens that the flash will be able to illuminate airborne particles. To produce orbs, the particles must be close to the lens. The farther away they are, the less likely it is that orbs will be produced. After a foot or two, particles will not produce noticable orbs.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
neumanns Goldmember 1,465 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2007 Location: North Centeral Minnesota More info | Jun 06, 2008 13:43 | #15 Insects can also cause them. 7D, Sigma 8-16, 17-55, 70-200 2.8 IS, 580ExII, ........Searching for Talent & Skill; Will settle for Blind Luck!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2671 guests, 162 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||